Larry Ellison Compares HP CEO's Forced Resignation to Jobs' Ouster at Apple

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 10, 2010.

  1. macrumors bot


    Apr 12, 2001


    The New York Times reports on the recent forced resignation of HP CEO Mark Hurd following claims of sexual harassment and improper expense reports, quoting Oracle CEO Larry Ellison as comparing Hurd's ouster to that of Steve Jobs' departure from Apple in 1985.
    Hurd had received strong reviews over his five-year tenure as HP's CEO, where he led the company past Dell to become the world's largest computer vendor and boosted company performance in a number of areas.

    Hurd's departure came after a relationship between Hurd and company contractor Jodie Fisher failed to pan out, resulting in allegations of sexual harassment by Fisher. In investigating the situation, HP's board discovered irregularities in Hurd's expense reports related to Fisher's work with the company. Taking the advice of a public relations firm, HP disclosed the full details of the situation and reached an agreement for Hurd's resignation, for which he is expected to receive up to $50 million in severance.

    While the circumstances of Hurd's departure are significantly different from those of Jobs' ouster, which was the result of an internal power struggle with CEO John Sculley, Ellison's argument compares Hurd's performance and leadership ability to that of Jobs by noting the similarity in talented leaders being chased away from their companies for reasons that could be considered unwarranted.

    Following Jobs' departure, Apple struggled as Microsoft-powered PCs dominated the late 1980s and 1990s. Jobs returned to Apple in 1997 with the company's acquisition of NeXT, which had been started by Jobs after he left Apple. Then-CEO Gil Amelio was ousted by the Apple Board of Directors a few months after the NeXT acquisition, and Jobs was installed as interim CEO, eventually dropping the "interim" title.

    Article Link: Larry Ellison Compares HP CEO's Forced Resignation to Jobs' Ouster at Apple
  2. macrumors 6502a


    Jan 28, 2010
    $50 mil? If that was me, I couldn't care less what happened to the company after I left. I'd be living the good life.
  3. macrumors 65816

    Jul 6, 2007

    No kidding. Getting paid $50 mil for screwing an ex-TV star? Where do I sign up?
  4. TSE
    macrumors 68030


    Jun 25, 2007
    St. Paul, Minnesota
    Hurd did a good job as HP's CEO, there is no doubt about it. He did a lot of good things for the company. Not sure if HP is going to crumble without him, but right now they are sitting pretty good in the PC industry.
  5. Guest


    Aug 6, 2008
    Manchester UK
    Look how smart Steve looked back when he used to make an effort :eek:
  6. macrumors regular

    Nov 26, 2002
    Ellison is an idiot. Like any experience in your life it shapes who you are and without Steve being kicked out he wouldn't be who he is today.. and there never would have been a NeXT company to buy!
  7. macrumors 65816

    Jun 2, 2010
    I read the headline and I thought Jobs was thrown out (again.) Must be a slow news day. . .
  8. macrumors 6502

    Jun 9, 2007
    I think Ellison is off base here.. Steve was the visionary of Apple Computer whereas Hurd was a professional CEO. In my next life I'm coming back as a Professional CEO. Hurd is hired to create a professional atmosphere at HP and he goes out and falls on his sword. The old adage of "Do what I say, not as I do" comes to mind here. These professional CEO's write their own contract with a clause that does not allow them to be fired unless they commit a felony, and walk away with a huge golden parachute (40 million in stock and cash). Now its on to the next corporation to be pillaged. If you or me committed fraud towards our employer, we would be booted out the door with a lawsuit pending. This guy does it and is rewarded. Capitalism at it's finest!
  9. macrumors 601


    Feb 4, 2004
    Florida Resident
    I noticed in CNET, they discussed one of Larry's presidents that would be a possible match for the new President of HP. That is probably one of the reasons for Larry's message.
  10. macrumors regular

    Jun 24, 2009
    I definitely agree with you on that.
  11. macrumors regular

    Dec 31, 2009
    "We're Apple, we don't wear suits. We don't even own suits!"

    I'm sure this suit would be a little baggy on Steve now...
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Mar 5, 2009
    Okay. Let's do something weird here. Papermaster is out and Hurd joins Apple to replace him, or maybe as future CEO. At least then Steve can step down and make room for new. Wait. His son is the new Apple CEO. Darn.
  13. macrumors regular

    May 9, 2006
    Agreed, the last thing on Hurd's mind at the moment is starting up a company, or creating, well, anything... He's off to some other firm to do some cost-cutting and other "necessary" restructuring...

    Hurd=Bureaucrat/manager/can't keep it in his pants, Jobs=Entrepreneur/visionary/manager/wanker
  14. macrumors 65816

    Sep 14, 2009
    I'm sure it won't be hard for him to find a job. Sanjay Jha from Motorola got paid $103 million a few years ago... and Motorola doesn't seem to be doing so well. Ditch Sanjay, hire Hurd.

  15. macrumors 68020

    Apr 26, 2003
    Was that supposed to be some sort of a witty statement or what :confused: :confused:
  16. macrumors 604

    Jul 29, 2003
    Silicon Valley
    Methinks the real crime is these multimillion dollar CEO salaries and bonuses. If you let them get away with that already, forging a few $10k charges to the expense account for deniable boinking or whatever shouldn't even be newsworthy. Hire them an accounting assistant who can hide their playtime expenses better, and then cut their pay/bonus by a few $10M's; that would be better, especially if they aren't running the company into the ground while playing around, like they did on Wall Street.
  17. macrumors 6502a

    May 23, 2007
  18. macrumors 68020


    Jun 25, 2009
    Surely, HP must be doing better than Apple did at the time. Jobs was blamed with almost destroying Apple Inc back then. HP's CEO had an ugly sexual harassment case that was settled out of court.
  19. macrumors newbie

    Aug 18, 2008
    San Francisco
    Excellent observation!
  20. macrumors demi-god


    Aug 11, 2003
    That may be true, but...

    That may be true however, Mark Hurd is definitely no Steve Jobs.

    Come on Mark Hurd is a dime-o-dozen CEO and to compare the two is a joke.

    All Hail Steve Jobs!
  21. macrumors 65816

    Sep 28, 2007
    Larry Ellison needs to get a grip.

    Comparing this guy to Jobs (and HP to Apple for that matter) is just a load of nonsense. Not in the same league.

    I have no opinion on whether the guy should have left HP or not, just talking about the bad comparison.
  22. macrumors 68030

    Full of Win

    Nov 22, 2007
    Ask Apple
    Political Correctness run amok. HP will get what they deserve.
  23. macrumors 6502

    Aug 7, 2006
    Wellesley, ON
    As a former HP employee, I think I can safely say Crazy Larry is way off base here. Hurd did nothing but buy up companies, and cut jobs.

    I'm sure Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard have been spinning in their graves the past few years, seeing what has become of this once great company.
  24. macrumors 6502

    Mar 20, 2008
    Actually, Mark Hurd is a little more expensive than that. By my calculation, he's more of a $600-million-a-dozen CEO. I would be a dime-a-dozen CEO, except that I'm not a CEO. Sigh...
  25. macrumors 6502

    Jul 27, 2010
    United States
    He's also significantly older now and you know...battled Cancer.

Share This Page