Little Snitch: Is it still flaky or does it work?

Discussion in 'Mac Basics and Help' started by drgrafix, Nov 2, 2012.

  1. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2008
    Location:
    New England
    #1
    I had been using Little Snitch a few years ago and I liked the idea that it showed me all I wanted to know about what was trying to get out to the internet. I disabled it about a year ago... and recently was playing around, got it going again but apparently its now outdated and is throwing up popups for Google and everything. Is the latest version flaky LOL or is it acting erratic because its so old? Debating an upgrade.

    Running OS X 10.6.8 and ready to jump forward to latest.
     
  2. macrumors 6502a

    monkeybagel

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2011
    Location:
    United States
    #2
    Sounds like it was doing it's job. Google tries to track a lot with different domains (google-analytics.com, googleadsyndication.com, etc.) that always block. I actually block those in DNS with *.doubleclick.net, etc.
    I don't have it so I can't answer your question on Mountain Lion unfortunately.
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Pakaku

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    #3
    It works as advertised, for me, and I'm running Mountain Lion. I do think it was the fact that you had it disabled for so long, and now it's frantically trying to figure out what you want blocked or not.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    poobear

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2009
    #4
    Grab the new version 3 it's great!
     
  5. macrumors 68020

    Jethryn Freyman

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2007
    Location:
    Australia
    #5
    More details? Screenshots?

    Google is used by a hell of a lot of apps.

    I have LS 2.4 installed on Leopard and it is literally *perfect*.

    "TCP Block" does a similar job, albeit with less control, and is free. Works on Leopard and newer.
     
  6. Moderator

    SandboxGeneral

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    #6
    The latest version works well for me.
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2011
    #7
    Using it since Tiger.
    Now at MLion

    Its rule set has learned what I want to know about.

    Recommended
     
  8. macrumors demi-god

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #8
    How does Little Snitch differ from Do Not Track+??:confused:
     
  9. Moderator

    SandboxGeneral

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2010
    Location:
    Detroit, Michigan
    #9
    Not sure; I haven't seen Do Not Track+?? before.
     
  10. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2009
    Location:
    Reno, NV
    #10
    Don't use version 3.x if you connect to a bunch of peers, as it currently has a bug in it that gobbles up memory. My Little Snitch Network Monitor is currently using 1.7 GB of my 8 GB.

    They posted this on their forums a few weeks ago:

    We are currently hard working on improving the memory and CPU
    consumption of the Little Snitch Network Monitor.

    The reason for eating up so much memory currently is, that
    all connections are monitor and stored even if those connections
    have occurred hours ago. Caused by a bug.

    By using services such as torrent, connecting to hundreds of
    different servers, the number of connection increases,
    and so does the memory consumption.

    Sorry for the inconvenience, but as already mentioned, we
    are working hard to get the best performance.
     

Share This Page