Mac Mini 2.26 or Mini Mac 2.0

Discussion in 'Mac mini' started by Wicked1, Apr 16, 2009.

  1. macrumors 68040

    Wicked1

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #1
    I am getting one or the other with 4 GB Ram, don't really care about the disk space I have enough external to go around.

    Is the 2.26 really worth the $150.00 Clams more that it costs.

    I have a New Unibody MacBook with the 2.4 anyone have both I am curious if the 2.26 is close to the MacBook 2.4. As far as the Nvidia 9400M I do not expect the same performance as my MacBook Pro 2.93 with 4 GB Ram.

    I just gave my son my MacBook 2.4 which I loved but I broke down for the 2.93 MBP and now I am looking for a toy Desktop for playing around with bc we have Macs at work so I can carry it back and forth, iMac to me is just not worth the limitations bc I have a 24" 2.1 Ghz at work, nice but not for me.


    Wicked1
     
  2. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2009
    Location:
    Raleigh, North Carolina
    #2
    I weighed the pros/cons on the 2.0 vs. 2.26. I have a thread on here about it. Search my previous posts to see what others said.

    I went with the 2.0/4GB/320GB. I hope to have it in my hands tomorrow.
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #3
    Wicked1 what are the limitations you are referring to regarding the iMac?
     
  4. thread starter macrumors 68040

    Wicked1

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Location:
    New Jersey
    #4
    iMac Limitations

    I mean a MacBook or Mac Min can be carried from place to place, but an iMac is a stationary Desktop, that is what I meant.


    Wicked1
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2008
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    #5
    Thanks for clearing that up.
     

Share This Page