Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard First Impressions

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 23, 2007.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    Despite Apple's efforts to restrict seeding to select individuals, it appears that the final build of Leopard has made its way outside of Apple. One individual who claimed to have installed Leopard as an upgrade to their iMac posted his experience. The Mac OS X upgrade took 30 minutes and these were his first impressions:

    Apple's Mac OS X Leopard 10.5 operating system officially launches on Friday, October 26th, 2007.

    Copies of Mac OS X Leopard not sanctioned by Apple may reflect illegal distribution of copyrighted material and cannot be condoned. Any requests for or provision of illegal software distributions in our forums will result in post deletion and account banning.


    Article Link
     
  2. Administrator emeritus

    xUKHCx

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Location:
    The Kop
    #2
    way to go made it to the front page despite the best efforts of some to shout him down.
     
  3. macrumors 601

    DMann

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2002
    Location:
    10023
  4. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2005
    Location:
    La Jolla, CA
    #4
    overall most comments are good.
    Can't wait for Friday
     
  5. Administrator emeritus

    xUKHCx

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Location:
    The Kop
    #5
    Hint: It wasn't arn
     
  6. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    #6
    does anyone else find it weird that the rss imports didn't work and that he had to manually create the path to the download stack? That doesn't seem like something they would overlook especially since time machine was made to automatically set up? you sure this is the absolute final version?
     
  7. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #7
    It's possible that is default behavior in the Upgrade. Not to change your download directories.

    I'm sure a default/fresh install would have them set correctly.

    arn
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2005
    Location:
    London
    #8
    I'd like to know what the specs of the system they were running it on and whether there will be speed improvements for G4 machines.
     
  9. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #9
    it was 2.33GHz Intel Core 2 Duo iMac with 3GB of RAM. Original thread

    arn
     
  10. Administrator emeritus

    xUKHCx

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Location:
    The Kop
    #10
    They are running it on a 2.33 GHz C2D iMac with 3 GB RAM
     
  11. macrumors 65816

    j-a-x

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2005
    Location:
    Houston, Texas
    #11
    Cool. So what does he dislike about stacks? I'm thinking they will be nicer than my current App launcher which is basically right clicking a folder in the dock.
     
  12. Guest

    Sky Blue

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
  13. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #13
    Looks like I'll be working with a clean ~/Library.
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Sora

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    Location:
    Arlington, VA
  15. Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #15
    Me too, but as I'll only have the uptodate disk to work with, its gonna take a while unfortunately.
     
  16. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    #16
    Sounded like he thought it wasn't that amazing a feature. I mean when you think about it you can do this with the current version.
     
  17. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2007
    Location:
    New York, NY
    #17
    Any word on Time Machine working with AirPort drives?
     
  18. Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #18
    Piracy...Leopard is on the torrent sites...
     
  19. macrumors 68040

    elppa

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2003
    #19
    Lots of comments about speed and responsiveness, which doesn't surprise me in the slightest. There is definite room for improvement in Tiger and it sounds like Apple have done a lot of tweaking in this area to deliver great performance.

    Safari respecting your original downloads preference is no big deal. They probably should have checked to see the downloads folder was set to the Desktop and then changed it to the Downloads stack. Just and oversight, a clean install would get the default right, but I wouldn't use that as a justification for a clean install.
     
  20. macrumors 6502a

    ricgnzlzcr

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    #20
    I really want to know that as well. I feel like they really will be slower once Leopard is installed but I'm hoping for a surprise from Apple
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 7, 2003
    #21
    i've honestly never understood torrents. dont they take days to dl?
     
  22. macrumors 68040

    queshy

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2005
    #22
    Wow, the fact that the user reported speed boosts is great - I wasn't expecting a boost in speed...! Can't wait for friday...
     
  23. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #23
    That might need a little work. I'll be starting with a new machines. :D

    I can get Ubuntu (~700 MB) in about 20-30 minutes via torrents from home.
     
  24. Retired

    psychofreak

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Location:
    London
    #24
    It depends how many people are sharing them at what speed, this one seems to have been downloaded by some in only a few hours...
     
  25. macrumors newbie

    tbazani

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2006
    #25
    so... Leopard it's FASTER than Tiger?

    it will run FASTER than Tiger in my machine?
     

Share This Page