Mac OS XI

Discussion in 'Mac Apps and Mac App Store' started by nightdweller25, Mar 30, 2005.

  1. nightdweller25 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2005
    #1
    Just for fun...What do you guys think will be accomplished in the next MAJOR release of Apples new OS? (Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X for example) Also, what do you think their new naming trend is goign to be since big cat name are running out. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
     
  2. mduser63 macrumors 68040

    mduser63

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #2
    I wonder how long it's going to be before they jump up to 11. I remember a quote from Steve Jobs about them sticking with OS X for quite a long while. At the rate they're going, assuming they go all the way to 10.9 before releasing OS XI/11, it'll be about another 10 to 12 years before OS 11 is due (assuming 1.5 - 2 years between point releases). A lot about computers changes in 10 years, and it's hard to say what new features and capabilities computers will have 10 years from now.

    That said, I think we can count on Apple coming out with some features that are really cool.
     
  3. Daveway macrumors 68040

    Daveway

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2004
    Location:
    New Orleans / Lafayette, La
    #3
    Steve Jobs said OSX will be used for the next 10 years and that was at MWSF 2000. So we can maybe look forward to OSXI in about 6 years. However I'm doubting it will be called Mac OS XI. It just doesn't sound good.
     
  4. MacsRgr8 macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #4
    Ueah.. the "X" is more than a "10"

    It is a brand...

    X for NeX T
    X for "Ten"
    X for Unix

    So. I assume that eventually we'll get a Mac OS X version 11.0... ha!
     
  5. trainguy77 macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2003
    #5
    From what i have heard 10.4 is the last 10.x OS then they go to 11. So i would think maybe 3-5 years.
     
  6. Blue Velvet Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #6

    I just don't know where people 'hear' this stuff.

    I think the future of OS X is only known to a handful of people and predictions about its future are just merely guesses. My guess is that we will see a 10.6...
     
  7. dsharits macrumors 68000

    dsharits

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2004
    Location:
    The People's Republic of America
    #7
    Where on earth did you hear that?

    Don't you all think that this is just a little early, seeing that we are still anticipating Tiger? ;)
     
  8. vouder17 macrumors 6502a

    vouder17

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2003
    Location:
    Home
  9. tommy.hanks macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2005
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    #9
    I'll be honest with you, I've only been using Mac OS X for a little less than 2 years. Before Panther came out, I had no idea how they would top Jaguar. Before I saw the Tiger preview I had no idea how they could possibly top Panther. Sitting here thinking about it, I haven't been this excited about computers since I was a little kid. As for what to expect in OS"11"? I draw a complete blank. But I guarantee you I'll buy it on the first day, even if it requires new hardware.
     
  10. Chaszmyr macrumors 601

    Chaszmyr

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    #10
    I think Apple will be simultaneously developing OSX 10.5 (perhaps codenamed Sabertooth), and OSXI. I think we'll see 10.5 in 2007 and OSXI in 2009.

    And if they wanted to be a little punny, they could advertise OSXI with the phrase "Oh, sexy!" (which is what OSXI might potentially sound like if you tried to pronounce it)
     
  11. Chaszmyr macrumors 601

    Chaszmyr

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2002
    #11
    I sure hope not! :p Mice just aren't equipped to handle a 3D UI.
     
  12. Timelessblur macrumors 65816

    Timelessblur

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2004
    #12
    That would be coping MS. Microsoft is adding 3d to thier UI
     
  13. dsharits macrumors 68000

    dsharits

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2004
    Location:
    The People's Republic of America
    #13
    Maybe by then Apple will have an IMAX LCD! (Of course they would have to call it iMax. :D ) Imagine the possibilities for gaming...
     
  14. Adurbe macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Location:
    Wales
    #14
    we will see OSXII before we see longhorn at this rate ;)
     
  15. yellow Moderator emeritus

    yellow

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2003
    Location:
    Portland, OR
    #15
    Mac OS Q, the Q is for Quantum. Because that's what we're producing. Quantum computers that come in a range of happy colors!
     
  16. altair macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2002
    Location:
    Seattle, WA
    #16
    I hope OS XI supports talking into your mouse, and ordering a big ham sandwich.

    "Computer, ham sandwich, hold the mayo!"

    And mabey if it had the internet downloaded and preinstalled, would be nice. Can isync the entire internet, so no more waiting for porn.
     
  17. AtHomeBoy_2000 macrumors 6502a

    AtHomeBoy_2000

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    #17
    To quote Scotty from Star Trek IV: "Hello computer!"
     
  18. dotdotdot macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    #18
    Mac OS X 11

    The World's First Virtual Reality OS
     
  19. wrldwzrd89 macrumors G5

    wrldwzrd89

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2003
    Location:
    Solon, OH
    #19
    Let's do some math here...

    I'll estimate 100 million unique domain names have so far been registered. I'll also estimate that 80% of them are still associated with sites (80 million). I'll estimate that the average amount of data per domain name is 1 gigabyte. That puts the estimate for the data for the entire Internet at 80 million gigabytes, or about 76.29 petabytes (1 terabyte = 1,024 gigabytes; 1 petabyte = 1,024 terabytes). I'll estimate that 12 million domain names are registered each year, contributing 11.44 additional petabytes of data. Work out that equation for however many years you want to archive to get a sense of how much storage you would need to iSync the Internet with your Mac.
     
  20. lordmac macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Location:
    Santa Cruz, CA
    #20
    Hahahah, though i bet using spotlight 3.0 he could tell it to search and tell isync to only download the sites with pornographic material;, this told at least reduce the needed space by about 20% estimating that 80% of the website out there are porn. :D ;)
     
  21. TDM21 macrumors 6502a

    TDM21

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    #21
    Another quote for Star Trek IV: "Just use the mouse."
     
  22. lordmac macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2004
    Location:
    Santa Cruz, CA
    #22
    JUst wondering if someone were to have a lot of money to spend pointlessly how many external hard drives can you hook up to say a powermac and have the os be able to use them all? If this number was greater then or equal to 39061 then by you calculations you could buy 39061 laCie Biggest F800's (2 tb each) and download the whole internet :D. You would cost only a mear $85934200 (this is estimating the price at $2200 each as they don't list a price sense the product isn't coming out tell "spring 2005" I am judging by the fact that the next level down is $1899(1.6 tb). Add another 4000 or so for a really well equipped powermac and another 3000 or so for firewire cords and power strips and you can have the whole internet downloaded for only $85941200. :D Here is link for the LaCie Biggest F800 http://www.lacie.com/products/product.htm?pid=10598
     
  23. ravenvii macrumors 604

    ravenvii

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2004
    Location:
    Melenkurion Skyweir
    #23
    Actually, IIRC, it was "just use the keyboard."
     
  24. KingSleaze macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2004
    Location:
    So. Cal
    #24
    How quaint.
     
  25. GeeYouEye macrumors 68000

    GeeYouEye

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Location:
    State of Denial
    #25
    If they were going to REALLY do something new (a la AppleDOS to Mac OS, Classic to OS X), they'd write it in Lisp with a Unix interpreter. I can't see that happening though.
     

Share This Page