Mac Pro is not water cooled?

Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by dcnblues, Jan 15, 2008.

  1. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    #1
    I'll be getting a Mac Pro, and probably go for the 3.0 GHz. A couple of quick questions:

    -There's a wikipedia page of tech specs for the Harpertown chips
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xeon#5400-series_Harpertown_and_5200-series_Wolfdale

    which shows that the 2.8 and 3.0 chips run at 80 watts, but while the 3.2 runs a TDP (thermal design power) of 120 watts. If I put a premium on running cool and quiet, is it correct to think that's good reason to choose the 3.0 over the 3.2 (I'm aware I'd lose about 7% in speed)?

    -Were some of the G5's water cooled? I remember seeing one of the mac tower's tech specs, and seeing water cooling, and being grateful the design had evolved to that efficient and quiet place. My old G4 sounds like a 767, and I'm worried my new Mac Pro will get there too, once it fills with dust. I can't see anything about the new one's being water cooled. Am I wrong?

    -I'm assuming one simply tries to reduce dust (I'll be keeping it off the ground at desk height, but don't know what else I can do) and blow it out with compressed air now and again to keep it cool and quiet. Any other tips would be welcome.

    -I seem to remember a suggestion, don't know from where, about putting some lube into the (noisy) fan. One noisy fan really could drive me up the wall, and if a judicious drop of silicone in the right place could fix this, I'd love more info. Is this a practical solution?
     
  2. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #2
    The Mac Pros are air cooled. You'll just need to blow the dust out of it. I haven't found them to be noisy but most of the fan issues normally require a replacement vs. lubrication.
     
  3. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    #3
    Only the dual 2.5 GHz G5 was water cooled... it didn't go over very well! None of the MacPros are water cooled.
    IMHO the 7% speed difference is not worth the money, spend it on ram!
    There was a model of G4 (Mirror Door) that was nicknamed the Wind Tunnel because its fans were so loud.
    Keeping it dust free is a good thing, compressed air in one hand and a vacuum cleaner in the other.
    I wouldn't squirt anything into a fan...
    :eek:
     
  4. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2008
    #4
    My new Mac Pro (got it Jan. 12) seems essentially silent. It is much quieter than the dual core G5 it replaced.

    Should I use vacuum or compressed air for cleaning my old G5?
     
  5. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #5
    I suggest compressed air. I do have an "electronics" vacuum for my rack but I'm still wary of using it.
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    product26

    Joined:
    May 30, 2005
    #6
    One of apples reasons for going intel was power efficiency.

    Water cooling was not an advancement. It was more like drastic measures being taken to try and effectively cool an inefficient processor (the G5).
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    #7
    Quoted For Truth.
    How about them G5 laptops!
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    Norway
    #8
    Just sold my Dual 2,5 G5 today, at least I never experienced any issues with the watercooling. Worked great for me.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2007
    #9
    The dual 2.7 and Quad G5 were as well...
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    #10
    um there are X5472 chips right? they are not even listed on that wiki. the only confirmation of a chip in the 3.0 is on these asian sites that have X5472 (which to my understanding is a 120w chip) next to the 3.0GHz model.

    wtf?!

    i think the only safe bet is the 2.8

    which was my plan cause i could not clear of up the confusion

    and calling apple is a dead end
     
  11. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2007
    #11
    Well, in hindsight, I thought this was interesting enough for it's own topic, but the d-b moderator didn't agree and locked it. But the initial post has (so far) 146 views, so maybe the d-b moderator should unlock it (Mac Pro 3.0 at 80 watts, 3.2 at 120). So much for this being an informative site...:mad:
     
  12. macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #12
    This should help a little. Straight from Intel but no TDP numbers.

    My Google work shows the E5472 (3.0 GHz) at 120W and the X5482 (3.2 GHz) at 150 W. Improved steppings are not taken into account, etc.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    #13
    so much confusion! i will be going with a 2.8 tomorrow
     
  14. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    #14
    The 2.8 and 3.0 share a common motherboard and cooling components, therefore they must be close in TDP. Ergo 3.0 MUST be an E5472 ( 80W TDP ) and NOT an X5472 ( 120W TDP ), the japanese site has it totally WRONG!

    The 3.2 is absolutely an X5482, weather it has a TDP of 120W or 150W is not clear. But it is a fact that the 3.2 has a different MLB and uprated cooling components vs the 2.8/3.0, If the 3.0 were X5472 it would share MLB and cooling components with the 3.2

    Also Apple is in a position to get top rated components from intel so it makes more sense Apple would choose E5472's over X5472's.
     
  15. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2007
    #15
    Shortly after I ordered my 2.8x2, I called Apple to see if they were the same MLB, because I was curious about CPU upgrades in the future--although at this point I'm leaning towards eBay/buying new the next time I need an upgrade. The woman I spoke with said she wasn't sure and put me on hold to ask a superior. If I was given an answer on the spot I wouldn't have trusted this, but I had hope I could believe it since she claimed to try to find out the correct answer.

    Is this a FACT? Where is this fact coming from? Do you know what the differences are? I figured the X5482 would get a beefier heatsync, but are there other differences in the boards between the Mac Pro models?
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2007
    Location:
    Austin, Texas
    #16
    Yeah, I just sold my liquid cooled G5 Quad for $1800. Great machine.
     

Share This Page