Macs Are Slacking!

Discussion in 'General Mac Discussion' started by awulf, Aug 6, 2002.

  1. awulf macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Location:
    South Australia
    #1
  2. Mr. Anderson Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #2
    memory and bus speed have a lot to do with it - even though another gig of Megahertz couldn't help either. A single Pentium blowing away a dual G4, pathetic, but true.

    When the new machines come out it will be interesting to see how they match up then.

    D
     
  3. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #3
    Macs are slower. They have been for some time. Apple/moto need to stop making iApps, and need to start working on their processors.
     
  4. tjwett macrumors 68000

    tjwett

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NYC
    #4
    well said. enough with the iCrap already. iThinkItSucks.
     
  5. Ensign Paris macrumors 68000

    Ensign Paris

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    Europe
    #5
    That is just one benchmark, over all I would say that people working on Macintosh would find it a more productive platform, basicly you save time on a Mac by not fiddle arseing around.

    Ensign
     
  6. djniche macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2002
    Location:
    DC
    #6
    I agree with the overall argument
    you definetaly get a better experience working on a mac. I agree that the speed is not helping. This gives more reason for apple to release a big jump on clock speed. I hope we see 1.5ghz - a dual 1.5ghz or even 1.4ghz dual machine will smoke any pc right now!

    look out aug 13!
     
  7. iGav macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    #7
    'YAWN'.............. another one of 'THOSE' threads...... :eek: :eek: :p

    I'm with you Ensign buddy........ ;) :)
     
  8. Ensign Paris macrumors 68000

    Ensign Paris

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2001
    Location:
    Europe
    #8
    With X.2 I hope to double as productive, technology is great but not when you are so bothered with technical details that it slows you working down, see DukeStreets thread "Does Technology kill creativity" or something like that :)

    Think Productive

    Ensign
     
  9. Rajj macrumors 6502a

    Rajj

    Joined:
    May 29, 2002
    Location:
    32° 44' N 117° 10' W
    #9
    I concur, Jaguar "should" help Apple blow the doors off the competition;)


     
  10. awrc macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Location:
    Milwaukee, WI
    #10
    Another gig of Megahertz?

    <quick thing with calculator>

    That's 1000000000 MHz.

    That's 1 PetaHertz.

    I think we can safely assume that'll have decent benchmark results :D

    I have no worries about what's coming down the pipeline. I don't think we're necessarily going to see any major processor speed bumps anytime soon (1.4-1..5GHz tops) but I think there are a slew of areas they'll improve - bus archiecture, bus speed, cache size and speed.

    I think we'll see some of this real soon, with the rest sneaking in in the next year or two.

    Another thing to remember, though, is that Apple's shifting focus from professionals to mid-level and consumers. x86 performance has kinda got out of control - outside of the desire to run the latest games faster, you've now got the situation where the major manufacturers are trying to push ever-faster machines on people who don't need them and haven't needed them since roughly the eera of the 500MHz PIII. Ditto with hard drives - with the exception of those who have vast numbers of MP3s, most machines are being sold with drives far larger than their users actually need.

    Ironically, it's the professional people that Apple's shifted focus from recently that *can* use all that surplus power.
     
  11. saabmp3 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    Location:
    Tacoma, WA
    #11
    Speed doesn't always make the top difference. Right now I'm on a AMD comptuer with all SCSI 15k drives and CAS 2 RAM. Trust me, it's a fvcking speed demon. It also crashes once a day. This is fine for me bumming around with 25% of my time doing critical stuff. Next year I'm going to be in a much harder place possibly startig adouble major immediatly going into a double masters. I need something that works, no questions asked when I'm writing papers. That's why I'm incredibly stoked for my powerbook. OSX works, plain and simple. I know there are some bugs, but nothing like Win 2k. Speed is a big factor, but for most people it's not even half of the game.

    BEN
     
  12. cb911 macrumors 601

    cb911

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Location:
    BrisVegas, Australia
    #12
    i read that all Macs will generally run better with the more RAM you can put in them. is this true?
     
  13. Pauls macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2002
    Location:
    Melbourne Australia
    #13
    Generally for OSX, 512 Mb ram is the minimum for a smooth experience. (Sure it will run on less) This will minimise 'swap outs'. This is where the system will write resources stored in ram temporarily onto your hard disk as it needs to free up ram for other tasks.

    The more ram you have the less the system will need to 'swap out'. The less ram the more your hard disk is used.
     
  14. bousozoku Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #14
    I've seen recently some reports about 2GHz (effective or real) machines having a lot of consistency problems and crashing a lot more than those at 1.5 GHz, for example. Have you found this to be true?
     
  15. Sepulchre macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2002
    Location:
    UK
    #15
    Cant disagree with that one :D
     
  16. awulf thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2002
    Location:
    South Australia
    #16
    I suppose in the long run macs are faster to use because they do the job and are less frustrating

    When I had a PC as my main computer(486), I had headaches nearly every day and I prefered my Mac IIsi over it, but the PC was more powerfull so I used it.
    Then I sold the 486 baught a PM7600 and there are no problems except for speed and the fact it doesn't run OS X well if at all.
     
  17. topicolo macrumors 68000

    topicolo

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Location:
    Ottawa, ON
    #17
    It hasn't happened in any system I've seen or heard of. The only reason I can think of for unstable 2Ghz+ machines is overheating, which is quite possible if a pc case isn't properly ventilated or if the chip isn't being cooled by a proper heatsink & fan.
     
  18. dagegen macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    #18
    Benchmarks never take such things into account as I plugged my iBook into the router and it just worked, I plugged in my digital camera and iPhoto knows its there.

    Perhaps a more interesting benchmark would be who could get there sytem out of the box and fetch their email fastest, ie one which measured productivity?
     
  19. iJon macrumors 604

    iJon

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    #19
    Macs Are Slower right now

    Macs truly are slower right now in raw power. I just built me a new PC for games. It is a 2ghz p4 and it flies. Havent tested it really in anything agaist the mac. And i have windows xp and honestly it is not bad, it is very stable from what ive used. although it is not near as stable as os x. But Apple is falling behind rapidly, intel is getting ready to cut prices on all there processors because they are coming out with a 2.8 ghz. Chances are apples new processors that will come out in the powermacs the 24th wont even compare, not even a dual will be as fast as the pentium. anyways, i am a die hard mac fan and i dont doubt for one minute that apple realizes they are behind. they are working on it, apple has always surprised us and i think they will do it again.

    iJon
     
  20. szark macrumors 68030

    szark

    Joined:
    May 14, 2002
    Location:
    Arid-Zone-A
    #20
    I think that the Xserve and all of the software editing companies they have purchased recently show that they haven't given up on professionals. They just need to give them some professional desktop systems to drool over. ;)
     

Share This Page