Did MacWhispers totally nail the iPod docking station or what? I know they didn't get the description right when they updated -- they still overanalyzed to "out-scoop" everyone but they certainly had the details on the enclosure and production dates right, eh? How many hit singles does a dropout website have to have before their info starts ending up on page one again? Certainly a "just the facts" standard in reporting from MW would filter out their crappy guessing (which they swore off, but now surprisingly appear to be going at again ). I wish they would uphold their promise to change the format; their info is obviously solid but far from reliable for standalone analysis.