Make [TIMG] default?

Discussion in 'Site and Forum Feedback' started by vniow, May 29, 2007.

  1. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #1
    I've noticed that some people have been a major proponent of the tags as opposed to [IMG] ones for larger images. I think if the former were to be made default it would solve a lot of the problems with images that end up being large enough to make people unnecessarily scroll abouts.


    Thoughts?
     
  2. macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #2
    No thoughts because I haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. I just upload an image and type .
     
  3. macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #3
    won't help loading times, but it'll make things more readable so i'm all for it.
     
  4. thread starter macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #4

    An example from another thread.

    tags:

    [img]http://www.geek.no/_dill/dill2.jpg

    tags:

    [img]http://www.geek.no/_dill/dill2.jpg

    It would help loading times slightly because its only loading the thumbnail image and not the full sized one. The main advantage is that it does make threads like photo ones especially far easier to read.
     
  5. Moderator emeritus

    SilentPanda

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Bamboo Forest
    #5
    What a TIMG?

    Edit: Oh I see. AHHHH!!!! I like TIMG now. I promise not to use IMG anymore!
     
  6. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #6
    actually won't help load times at all, since the full image is loaded, and then scaled down by the user's browser.

    The only issue with making it default is it enlarges small images to the same size. It's not "smart". But depending on how often that happens, people could use some new tag like [smallimg] or something which won't scale at all.

    arn
     
  7. macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #7
    Isn't that exactly what my method does, too? :confused:
     
  8. macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #8
    in theory it would, but since they're just tags, i think it still loads the whole version, just in a thumbnail view.

    notice it won't take any longer to load the full size when you click on the thumbnail to view fullsize.
     
  9. Administrator/Editor

    WildCowboy

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #9
    We've talked about it, but one problem, as arn points out, is that also scales up larger images:

    [​IMG]

    becomes

    [​IMG]

    If we can fix that issue, I would be in favor of implementing it.
     
  10. macrumors 68040

    mattscott306

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2007
    #10
    I'm for this, it helps keep screen's nice a purty.
     
  11. macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
  12. thread starter macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #12

    Its for externally linked images. Not manually uploaded ones.


    About the upsizing issue, could there be some way where a drop-down menu having both with a small description implemented?
     
  13. macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #13
    Oh, I have no idea how you do that anyway. Ignorance is bliss, I think.
     
  14. thread starter macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
  15. macrumors 601

    xsedrinam

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2004
    #15
    I don't know about the techno aspects, load speeds being affected and all, but for the simple asthetics of one particular thread, it seems it would be nice to have a smaller, uniform image size which could be enlarged with a click, according to personal interest. I don't visit Pic of the day anymore. It's contents are fab, but the huge display and image sizes are cumbersome. Obligatory IMO.

    Thanks for bringing it back up, vniow.
     
  16. macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #16
    same thing here. i can't read that thread. hurts to. but it has some wonderful stuff in there.
     
  17. arn
    macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #17
  18. macrumors 603

    SkyBell

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    Texas, unfortunately.
    #18
    Do people feel a need to type IMG and TIMG? I just use img and timg. works the same for me.
     
  19. Moderator emeritus

    mad jew

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia
    #19
    I'm all for having both options in the toolbar.



    No, that's my 'tar.
     
  20. macrumors Core

    iBlue

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2005
    Location:
    London, England
    #20
    I love the TIMG feature (and have been using it myself for a while on larger images) but I wouldn't like to see it as default unless that scaling up issue is resolved. It may not help load times but it makes browsing on a small-medium sized laptop much easier. side-scroll is pants.
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2007
    Location:
    Brighton, East Sussex, UK
    #21
    rather then implementing a whole new MOD into this...cant we just change the old one? so like if(width<500) or (height<300) then scale..?

    dno really just a thought. also while where updating the images part..how about including a lightbox type plugin, so it doesnt open each picture that you click in a new window, but rather an ajax overlay..?

    :)
     
  22. macrumors 65816

    AppleIntelRock

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2006
    #22
    the majority of inserted images i've come across lately need to be scaled down... i personally think it makes more sense for TIMG to be the default (since most images need that) and if your image doesn't need a TIMG tag... you could simply change it to IMG.
     

Share This Page