MB vs. MBP

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Sobering, Sep 9, 2006.

  1. Sobering macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Location:
    Canada
    #1
    Hey guys I am wanting to get an Apple laptop but can't really afford a MBP. What are the main differences between MB and MBP? Also, when are Apple's laptops going to be converted into Core 2 Duo machines? Also, as a previous owner of an iMac, I was already used to the screen size and resolution of the 17-inch. What do you think?
     
  2. Eidorian macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #2
    1. The video card in the MBP
    2. ExpressCard slot
    3. Screen resolution
     
  3. Sobering thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Location:
    Canada
    #3
    What about the sound quality in the MB. Will those built in speakers be good for just listening to music?
     
  4. aristobrat macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2005
    #4
    I much, much prefer the sound quality of the MacBook Pro I had vs the MacBook that I currently have. IMO, the MBP was quite a bit louder and more crisp.

    I also miss the MBP backlit keyboard. Sounds like a cheesey feature, but once you're used to it, it's no fun when it's gone. :)
     
  5. Sobering thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Location:
    Canada
    #5
    Dosn't MB have lights under the keyboard? The one I saw at the store I thought it did.
     
  6. thebeephaha macrumors 6502

    thebeephaha

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2006
    Location:
    Seattle WA
    #6
    Nope. MacBook Pro only.
     
  7. Sobering thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Location:
    Canada
    #7
    When MacBooks get upgraded do you think they will be a better graphics card? That's my only problem with getting one right now is the graphics card that's currently in the MacBooks.
     
  8. stcanard macrumors 65816

    stcanard

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #8
    You know, I really don't miss that feature.

    It was a great ghee-whiz feature when I first got my PowerBook, but then I turned it off -- I don't look at the keys anyway, and when I did need to look, the residual glow from the LCD was enough to see.

    I also turned off the brightness adjust, because it wreaked havoc with my battery life. Again it was neat for a bit, but never seemed to get it right and FN-F1/F2 was easier and faster.

    I think Eldorian has it right, those are the three main differences. From my point of view:

    1) I never used the cardslot in my PowerBook, everything was either built-in or a storage device I connected by firewire / usb

    2) Resolution / screen size -- when I'm portable, smaller and lighter is better. When I'm at home, I plug it into an exernal monitor if I need extra size.

    Which, to me, leaves the video card as the determining factor. Then you have to set aside the religious wars (<OMG> how dare they put an <ugh> integrated card in? Its useless for anything! </OMG>) and decide: Does my usage pattern require the additional features provided by the card?

    Surprisingly, for most people even considering a MacBook, the answer is no, they don't require it, the integrated card is actually quite decent.

    But IMO that's where the decision lies: integrated or not, depends on what you do.
     
  9. Eidorian macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #9
    I doubt you'll see any improvement until Santa Rosa.

    http://guides.macrumors.com/Merom
     
  10. nitynate macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Location:
    Clearwater, FL
    #10
    ...And I do not think it is wise waiting for anything unless it is a week or two, just buy s**t when you need it.
     
  11. Chone macrumors 65816

    Chone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2006
    #11
    Well the really cool thing about MacBook Pro is the graphics card and design, I have a MacBook and while I love it the GMA950 is just too little for my tastes and I still don't feel 64mb of shared RAM is enough for the GUI plus integrated leeching off RAM sucks.

    Honestly I don't like the graphic card and it is my only big complain with MacBook, any dedicated graphic cards would have been better but oh well.
     
  12. XP Defector macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2006
    #12
    I agree, a dedicated graphics card would have made the MacBook probably the best notebook ever made :D
     
  13. arcobb macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Location:
    Colorado
    #13
    I love my macbook ... and I can't think of anything that I wish it could do ... so I think it probably is the best notebook ever made. It has all of the things I loved about the 12 inch powerbook plus the perfect screen and 10 times more useful then the powerbook (isight, dual core, runs windows).
     
  14. -::ubermann::- macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2006
    #14
    thats for sure, im insecure about buying a inspiron 9400 or a macbook
    if the macbook had video dedicated card, i would have ruled out dell inmediately
     
  15. kevinliu4 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2006
  16. xparaparafreakx macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2005
    #16
    17" MBP is the way to go.

    4 speakers, huge screen and sex appeal.
     
  17. Jiddick ExRex macrumors 65816

    Jiddick ExRex

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Location:
    Roskilde, DK
    #17
    But only for those who wants a combined desktop/laptop replacement.

     
  18. ictiosapiens macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    #18
    I'm on the exact same boat, if the macbook had dedicated graphics, I would have bought it when it came out... Now I'm close to pulling the trigger for a Dell XPS 1210(with merom, dedicated graphs, and the small form factor) I know is fugly, but for me... function > looks ALWAYS!!!

    I'm going to wait until tuesday and see what happens, but I see it very unlikely that apple will do anything to it's Notebook line, I think it will focus on the Itunes/ipod/video content...
     
  19. mikesk8 macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2006
    Location:
    Helsinki
    #19
    They cannot put all nice stuff into MB:) some features are only for MBP;) MB is a consumer laptop and 950 is rather a standard chip for this level/price.
     
  20. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #20
    I agree with anyone who said that if the MacBook had a dedicated graphics card, it would be the best computer ever. Actually, since I'd never tax a graphics card for what I do, I'll say that if the screen had a slightly higher resolution, it would be perfect for me.
     
  21. stcanard macrumors 65816

    stcanard

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2003
    Location:
    Vancouver
    #21
    A serious question -- what is it you are planning to do with your MB(P)? that requires the Radeon X1600 over the GMA 950?

    I'm going to assume its not gaming, since buying an Apple laptop for gaming is kind of silly (and I'm still not certain why somebody wouldn't just buy a cheaper laptop + an XBox).

    I'm asking because I have to admit I've never sat at my laptop and said "@#$&* this video card is just too slow", but I see enough complaints about it, that I know there is a segment that requires it, and I'd like an idea of what it is!
     
  22. ®îçhå®? macrumors 68000

    ®îçhå®?

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2006
    #22
    WHY?!?!?!
    I wrote a perfectly good mac guide about this. I suggest reading it
     
  23. dornoforpyros macrumors 68040

    dornoforpyros

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2004
    Location:
    Calgary, AB
    #23
    I'd suggest posting a link to it if your going push it as the be all & and all of this debate. :rolleyes:
     
  24. ictiosapiens macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 9, 2006
    #24
    I like to have the possibility of playing a nice round of Half Life 2 every once in a while when I'm bored in some random hotel room somewhere. I know I could carry my NDS with me, but WHY??? why can't I have a computer that covers all my necesities, why do I have to settle for less? Other manufacturers are making this machines(dell, sony, Asus, acer) So why can't apple make this computer?

    Again, I want to be able to game occasionally, but for normal use, I would prefer Mac OS(I know I can use mac os on a pc with some hacking, but I'm a bit of a noob, so I would probably struggle doing that)

    And the Xbox thing, I have an Xbox 360, but it doesn't really fit my bag that confortably...lol


    There definately is a segment that wants it, the segment that bought the Powerbook 12'' over the Ibook 12''... The Macbook is as most people will agree an excellent machine, but it's still missing that edge on graphics, and as if the GMA 950 was so great, apple decides(for whatever reason) to clock it at a speed nearly half below intel specs.

    And that is basically it, I want a portable(10-14 inches) that can do everything I can throw at it, and at the mo, the XPS 1210, does it, but it lacks Mac OS, which is the only reason I've waited this long for apple to make this system...
     
  25. ergle2 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    #25
    I've seen the argument you're responding to here, and it's ludicrous -- it's YOUR money, so you get to choose what suits you -- and that's even if it doesn't make sense to others.

    The "get an Xbox" one is another I hear often. That's all well and good, but the two markets are very different. Most of the games I really like either don't appear on consoles or I don't enjoy playing them on consoles (FPS games, for example -- they just don't work on a joypad for me.)

    I don't think Apple will release a small-form-factor MBP any time soon though, so I'm afraid it looks like you're stuck making a compromise one way or another.
     

Share This Page