Michael Ross Connecticut serial killer executed

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacNut, May 12, 2005.

  1. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #1
    Connecticut serial killer executed

    Michael Ross

    A serial killer who struggled to hasten his own death -- and was forced to prove he wasn't out of his mind -- was put to death this morning in Connecticut. It was New England's first execution in 45 years. Michael Ross, 45, fought off attempts by public defenders, death penalty foes and his own family to save his life. The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday night rejected relatives' last-minute appeals, paving the way for the execution.

    http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/05/13/ross.execution.ap/index.html
     
  2. Lacero macrumors 604

    Lacero

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #2
    A public beheading Iraqi-style would have been cheaper and graphic enough to deter would-be criminals.
     
  3. arf macrumors member

    arf

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2004
    Location:
    UK
    #3

    you are sick in the head
     
  4. redeye be macrumors 65816

    redeye be

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Location:
    BXL
    #4
    he is, but he's right
     
  5. Lacero macrumors 604

    Lacero

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #5
    Yes I am.
     
  6. EJBasile macrumors 65816

    EJBasile

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2004
    #6
    Thank god, I'm tired of this stupid thing being dragged out and having to pay with it with my tax dollars.
     
  7. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #7
    The system thrives on this kind of thing so it can soak the taxpayers for every last dime. Pretty silly waiting years and years to pay all those judges,lawyers,cops,jails,cooks,accountants,jailers,etc etc only then to get rid of the guy. Now what will they do? oh yeah they are trying to make criminals out of smokers next.
     
  8. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #8
    All evidence I've seen is to the contrary, that the death penalty is simply not a deterrant. Can you enlighten me otherwise with some proof of your assertion?

    No criminal thinks they're going to get caught, let along punished, at the time of the commission of the crime.
     
  9. redeye be macrumors 65816

    redeye be

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Location:
    BXL
    #9
    I'm against the death penalty but doing it the 'lacero-way' would be indeed cheaper, and maybe have more 'effect' then the 'humane' way, if there is any effect and/or humane way.
     
  10. MacNut thread starter macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #10
    The problem with the death penalty is that it could take up to 20 years for the execution to happen if at all. If it was a swift punishment then yes it would deter crime and people would think twice if they new that in 6 months they would be killed themselves.
     
  11. iGary Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #11
    Who cares if it is a deterant?

    He admitted it and at least we won't be paying to keep his miserable butt alive for 40 years.
     
  12. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #12
    It cost you more to execute his miserable butt than it would have to keep him alive for 40 years.

    And if it's not a deterrant, what's the point? Vengence?
     
  13. Eevee macrumors 6502a

    Eevee

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2004
    Location:
    New Haven, CT
    #13
    I'm glad that the whole thing is over. He knew perfectly well what he did was wrong and that he deserved to die.
     
  14. iGary Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #14
    Really? He denied the whole appeals process...

    So you're going to show me how 0>40. That'll be neat.

    And if it's not a deterrant, what's the point?

    Removing him from society without being a further burden on taxpayers.
     
  15. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #15
    I'm not sure how it works in CT, but generally a capital conviction GUARANTEES an appeal.

    From the linked article (did you even read it?):
    The bolded part would suggest that appeals had been conducted already, would it not? And who pays for those appeals again?

    Sure, it's easy.
    Link'd
    Read up on it. Also I'd point you again to the original article where it says:
    What do you think, that these hearings are free? Donated time from the judges, no overhead for courtrooms or staffers? That the courtroom fairy shows up and pays the tab?

    See above. Keep him in jail for life if you really want to reduce the burden on the taxpayers. Or just admit that you fall for a good emotionally-based case of bloodlust now and then.
     
  16. redeye be macrumors 65816

    redeye be

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2005
    Location:
    BXL
    #16
    maybe this thread should be moved to the political forum now.
     
  17. rainman::|:| macrumors 603

    rainman::|:|

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2002
    Location:
    iowa
    #18
    Good call Mactastic. The penal system needs to decide whether it's meant for rehabilitation or punishment... I mean, if it's the latter, let's stop dancing around these ideas that criminals even can be rehabilitated OR deterred... But the government killing someone is just punitive, period. If it saved money, there *might* be a case for it. Fortunately it's getting harder to justify having a death penalty when we condemn other countries for it, it's just a difference in who they apply it to...
     
  18. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #19
    Yeah, 'cause serial killers will straighen right up as soon as they'd see that :rolleyes:

    Some sick SOBs just want to see a state-sanctioned snuff film. Probably get a chubby from watching it too.
     
  19. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #20
    If you support the death penaly, you are not Christian.
     
  20. iGary Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #21
    Mactastic,

    Basically, what the studies you posted say is that the entire, LENGTHY, EXPENSIVE appeals process costs tons of money versus life in prison. The cases studied are based on specific, hand-picked death rows that had criminals on them facing their fifth, sixth and seventh appeals. Fine, sentence them to life and avoid the lengthy appeals process.

    This guy confessed, asked to forego the appeals process, which of course, would have is cheaper than keeping him alive for fourty years. Let's compare apples to apples, shall we? I say let him die.

    So you've basically done what most left-leaning folks do when faced with soomeone who agrees with the death penalty in a case where there is NO DOUBT as to guilt or innocence. You've labeled them a bloodthirsty neocon right wing lunatic. Nice.

    Otherwise, I'm not really sure what I think about the death penalty. I know this guy confessed and there was no doubt as to his sanity or guilt. If there is not 100% proof of guilt, I'm definitely against the death penalty.

    So label me what you will.

    You guys have fun in this little "area for free exchange of ideas" you've created where someone with a differing viewpoint basically gets attacked, labeled and filed as a fringe lunatic if they don't line up with your liberal viewpoints. It is really too bad that a lot of the moderate/right leaning folks on this board won't come in here anymore because there's no respect for their viewpoints - I've received at least a dozen PM's from folks saying it's a worthless cause to try and express your viewpoint in the political forum, and it's a shame, because these are good, smart people.

    You rarely see a "Demokrats r stoopid liers faces" on this board, but there is no shortage of what you would label hate speech defamation of certain politicians in this country. I'm off to talk about Macs again. ;)

    Have fun.

    Cheers!

    :D
     
  21. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #22
    What is support of the death penalty if not bloodlust?

    It's not about justice or punishment or deterrent. It's a thirst for revenge, pure and simple.

    Death is not a penalty.
     
  22. pseudobrit macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #23
    It's their fault if they can't keep up.

    Crimea River.
     
  23. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #24
    Yes that is the point. We can do executions on the cheap, but our courts have determined (and yes I understand that all judges are liberal and activist ;) ) that there is no way to give someone a fair shake without a lengthly appeals process.

    iGary, have you ever heard of suicide by cop? Coerced confessions? Diminished mental capacity? If you **** up and execute someone even though they have confessed but didn't do it you have potentially left a killer walking the streets. You've gone and done what most right-leaning folks do when presented with arguments against the death penalty: Try to present the guaranteed scenario where supposedly there is absolutely no doubt they guy is guilty. Problem is, life ain't black and white like that. You can NEVER know for sure.

    I've not even gotten into the moral aspects of the death penalth, which IMHO are vastly more important than the accounting arguments. I'm only focusing on those because that's where you based your argument to start with. If you'd like to talk further about the futility of killing people to show how much our society despises killing people I'd be more than happy to.

    I did no such thing. You said you would rather sentence people to life if it's going to cost more, so I don't see any reason to label you bloodthirsty. I was simply pointing out that those were your choices when faced with the fact that the death penalty is neither a deterrent to crime, nor a cost-savings over life incarceration.

    Like I said, IRL there is no 100%. 99.99999% perhaps, but no guarantees.

    Ok, I'll call you nominally anti-death penalty based on what you've just said. Feel free to correct me.

    Hmm.. Somehow 'Rat manages. I think if you asked him you'd find that he feels his views are respected, even if there is serious disagreement.

    Politics ain't beanbag ya know? It's funny that you'd label this a liberal viewpoint forum. I don't think you'd know what to do with an actual honest-to-god leftist.

    It's too bad you weren't here around the time the buildup to Dubya Dubya Two was going on, you would have seen a completely different forum here. The 'left' was in the minority for a long time. Once things went sour there a lot of the right-wing blusterers disappeared for some reason. ;)

    You aren't looking. Start a thread about Al Gore, Michael Moore, or HRC outside the poli section and you'll see it happen right quick.

    Again, this forum is full-contact. I'll repeat that: This forum contains FULL CONTACT discussion. If you can't hang with that, stay out. If you can stay away from personal insults and trolling we welcome any and all comers.But don't expect kid glove treatment when you come in here and make some ***tty comment and then leave. Which I have to say, you've done several times. Frankly your tone towards me and others in this forums has been pretty sarcastic and insulting several times. So you can obviously dish it out, which is fine. But when it comes back at you, you start these worlds-tiniest-violin diatribes rather than trying to put forth a cogent argument.

    Sucks, I was kind of hoping you would be able to provide a different viewpoint and be a regular in this forum. You have a unique perspective, and I think we probably agree about more than we disagree. But I gotta say, if I went over to 'Rat's High Road forum the last thing I'd be doing is whining about how all the gun owners are so hateful to liberals and why oh why won't everyone be nice to me. I'd expect to be taking it on the chin. A lot. But that politics, right?
     
  24. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #25
    "Theirs not to reason why, theirs but to do and die"...
    ;)
     

Share This Page