Mini-iPod not as cheap as hoped: Some Apple fans balk at $24...

Discussion in ' News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Jan 12, 2004.

  1. macrumors bot

  2. macrumors regular

    I think Apple was hoping that the mini's would sneak into the top 20 best sellers that they post on their mainpage. However, it doesn't appear that they are selling like they would obviously like. I'm sure it will be at least a couple months before they start to lower the price.
  3. macrumors G5


    As if the price is somehow an Apple misstep...

    Other 4 GB mini players cost the same as Apple's. Flash players with 256 MB cost in the same range!

    What we have is a tiny vocal fraction of Mac "fans" beleving rumors that were NEVER possible (due to the costs of mini HDs). Then they get angry at Apple because the rumors were impossible. And because the 15 GB is such a good deal?

    The mini competes with $199 256 MB flash players. For those who need more space, Apple will gladly take another $50 for a full iPod.

    When mini HDs can be made more cheaply, they will be. What's the big deal?
  4. macrumors regular


    And analysts said Apple would come out with a 2GB mini iPod for $100.

    Who cares what the analysts think?
  5. macrumors 65816


    balk, balk, balk, balk, balk!
  6. macrumors 604


    So Sorry.

    Apple has a decentally priced player for the current GB amount, but compared to the 15 GB model it looks bad.

  7. macrumors 65816


    Exactly, I was just reading about analysts who were quoted as saying that iTunes would never take off due to the dominance of PCs running Windows.
  8. macrumors 68000


    Well at least now Apple gives you the choice. If a tiny form factor is most important to you, go with the mini for $249. Or if capacity is most important, pick the 15GB iPod for $299. So I don't see what the problem could possibly be, you can't go wrong either way.

Share This Page