more power4 hints

Discussion in 'Hardware Rumors' started by metfoo, Sep 17, 2002.

  1. metfoo macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2002
    #1
    taken from:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=5426
     
  2. Mr. Anderson Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #2
    weird, just mentioned in passing.....hmm, I definitley like the 6.4 GB/s bandwidth - that would be one nice machine......I hope this is more than speculation

    and there is no more mention of the G4 in the article, damn.
     
  3. dongmin macrumors 68000

    dongmin

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #3
    I love how after rumors get circulated enough, it becomes fact, and now everyone tosses around these bits of info as if they're common knowledge. This Novakovic guy probably just overheard someone talk about the Power4 rumors and just assumed it was true.
     
  4. peter2002 macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2002
    Location:
    Dallas, TX
    #4
    Vaporware!

    No main memory RAM exists that does 6.4GB/sec. The fastest RAM is 1066 RDRAM which clocks out at 4.1 GB/sec. Next October 2003, Rambus is coming out with 1333 RDRAM which will max out at 5.2 GB/sec.

    You won't see anything faster until mid 2004. You are dreaming if you think Apple will have the Power4 in the PowerMac in Jan. 2003. All you will see is a faster G4 that Motorola will call G5 clocking at best 1.6GHz, built w/ 130NM tech, with a 512 cache, and maybe at best a (real) 333 DDR front side bus. Not the overclocked crap Apple is pushing now. Motorola is too broke and losing too much money to make anything faster.

    And the Power4 is incompatible with AltiVec based software. Developers won't spend millions to rewrite their software to run on the unproven Power4.

    Peter
     
  5. alex_ant macrumors 68020

    alex_ant

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2002
    Location:
    All up in your bidness
    #5
    Re: Vaporware!

    You blasted one rumor away, but you used an equally flaky rumor to back yourself up here with regards to AltiVec. The mention that the new Power4-derived PPC will not be AltiVec-compatible is only speculation - reported by one person who talked to another person at IBM who we are supposed to believe knew what he was talking about. IBM would be mad for this new chip not to support VMX. If this new chip isn't AltiVec-compatible (but NOT called such, for AltiVec is a Motorola trademark), then bicycles don't have wheels, or something.

    Alex
     
  6. arn macrumors god

    arn

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2001
    #6
  7. pilotgi macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2002
    #7
    Especially when you're dealing with the Inquirer.

    This is incorrect. "Altivec" is Moto's brand name for a vector processing unit. Apple calls it "velocity engine". IBM has indeed added a vector processing unit to the rumored Power4-lite-mini me.

    No one knows for sure until the official announcement by IBM, but it appears no software will have to be rewritten.
     
  8. MacCoaster macrumors 6502a

    MacCoaster

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2002
    Location:
    Washington, DC / Rochester, NY / Lexington, NC
    #8
    While your original statement was correct, your last statement is incorrect. It's not rumored that IBM is working on a new POWER-family chip (includes Performance Optimization with Enhanced RISC and PowerPC). It's a fact. Any details beyond that is purely speculative until announced on October 15.
     
  9. Stike macrumors 65816

    Stike

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2002
    Location:
    Germany
    #9
    Re: Vaporware!

    Sorry, wrong, the PS2s Memory Bus has 6.4 GB/s bandwidth, mainly because it is directly connected via 128 Bit Bus to the Emotion Engine CustomChipSet.
     
  10. Telomar macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2002
    #10
    Re: Vaporware!

    Ok just to correct a few facts. Firstly RDRAM offers less bandwidth than DDR RAM. The only reason RDRAM shows as higher is because currently you can only buy it as a dual channel offering, which effectively doubles the bandwidth. The real bandwidth of RDRAM 1066 is only ~2.1 GB/s. Dual channel DDR RAM can reach 4.2 GB/s with DDR-266, 5.4GB/s with DDR-333 and 6.4 GB/s with DDR-400. Offerings already exist for dual-channel DDR-400 memory as well.

    Second the MPX bus will never be a DDR bus. Not ever. Technically it's too much trouble and doing things which are technically troubling costs money, which Motorola by your own words can't afford to spend.

    Motorola is already switching their G5s to on-chip memory controllers and RapidIO and assuming they were to release a next generation system for Apple they would do the same.

    Third Apple does not sell overclocked systems. Anybody who says otherwise is simply ignorant.

    Finally you are correct the POWER4 won't appear in Macs but you are wrong in that the POWER4 isn't an unproven technology.

    Additionally IBM has already come on the record as stating they are developing a POWER4 derivative with a SIMD unit. It won't be altivec, which is Motorola's implementation of that instruction set, but Apple isn't planning on using anything in their future chips (at least for the near term) that doesn't retain altivec compatibility.
     
  11. DaveGee macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2001
    #11
    That might be what most people know but others do know more and some people right have even gotten it right either cause they 'really know' or they were lucky. Problem is with most (not just this one) open forums is when people who do know the facts try to present them people either demand proof (understandable I guess) that the person isn't willing to provide (also very understandable).

    I'm in that position myself... so rather than try and argue with those who say Alti-Vec is *totally impossible* (it isn't) or 6.4Gb/s can't happen (it can) we either post silly messages like I'm doing right now or just don't say anything and laugh.

    What's best is to have much smaller (far less public) invite only forums where fools who post trash rumors (just for fun) as well as people who shout down people just because they don't like what the person is saying get booted and never get invited back. An 'insiders club' if you will.

    Do those places exist? I dunno but it sure wouldn't surprise me.. :cool: Well that's the kinda place I'd like to be... I'm getting way to tired of silly photoshop mockups and tales of iWalks and the like.

    Dave
     
  12. Kid Red macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2001
    #12
    Ok, I'll repeat the info I've received again. We will have power4 core macs by this time next year. Moto will have the last G4 in jan but doubt it will be called a G5 when everyone knows it's a G4. It should, however, be on a new mobo. The last bump was supposed to feature it but they had major heat issues which may explain the ports in front of the towers.

    We WILL have this IBM power4 core mac nexy year according to a very creditable source.
     
  13. Chisholm macrumors regular

    Chisholm

    Joined:
    May 31, 2002
    Location:
    Tuscaloosa, Alabama
    #13
    I agree Dave! Send me an invite when you find such a haven.
     

Share This Page