Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Mac Pro' started by runninmac, May 5, 2006.
I just was going to the iPod page when this came up...
just go to apple.com/ipod
Well Macbook is a trademark:
but it's on the ipod page ?
Eyes like a Hawk!...... well spotted!
It's gotta be next Tuesday.
interesting, I do not know why it would be under the iPod page but it does look like it will be coming out soon.
Nicely spotted indeed.
Interesting that it is still there.
I love hype.
I can't wait to see these MacBooks even though i am not even in the market for one...Hahaha.
apple is messing with us - how long has it been like this already??
like they don't know the ipod page is broke
Im beginning to think your right. Maybe they are trying to build up the hype again, before the release shortly?
Think of how many people visit apple.com/ipod, and will see the word MacBook. It's genius.
The people who forgot about it, or the people who lost hope, will now be reminded.
well i am all excited again even though i've finally made up my mind i'll be shopping for any apple laptop only in july....
well it definitely is the macbook n not the macbook pro coz when we go to check out the hardware section and check the macbook pro we get the path right at the bottom which shows as macbook pro...whereas in this ipod page it shows jus macbook...
and hey that link seems to have been fixed for the ipod....haha macbook is coming....ta la la
Nope...the link still leads to that page...
Just type in "www.apple.com/ipod" and bam.
hey ya that seems to work but if u actually link on the link from the apple store we get the ipod page....weird....but wat the heck...macbook's r coming
this is the cleverest thing i've seen in ages...
i'm surprised nobody has said anything yet about 'www.ipod.com', which quite conveniently redirects to 'www.apple.com/ipod'. the actual ipod model sites are all 'www.apple.com/ipod/*.html'.
i went to 'view source' in safari but didn't really manage to uncover much more. except it seems to me evident that this is anything but an oversight on apple's part. as has already been mentioned in this thread, i think they're trying to get the name out there and get the anticipation stirring by leaving ambiguous clues like this floating around. it's certainly working on me...
thank you for pointing it out.....yay am so glad we finally have some solid proof...