Don't go with the RAZR!
I know the hype is there, but apart from a pretty cool looking phone with quad-band service, there is nothing to justify the price tag on it! The bluetooth is only 1.1 (poor range), the camera is only VGA (same camera as was used on the V600 a year before), with no flash or optical zoom, the build quality is marginal (they actually twist and creak!), and there is almost no memory. Any phone worth their money this year should have:
high speed data (edge or 3G)
good camera (1MP or greater)
Bluetooth 2.0
at least 16MB of memory, preferably an expandable option (mms, memory stick, etc.)
Additional features (by this I mean things like MP3 player, video player/recorder, GPS, etc.)
If the phone doesn't have at least a few of these, you should not be paying more than $200 out of contract or less than $30 with contract. The Razr is like $400, even with a 2-year contract! That's just crazy. Also, moto's have sucked for the past five years. I'll admit they have begun to offer some decent phones, but not at that price tag.
The only good makes at the moment that I would put any faith into (myself) are SE, Nokia or Samsung. Yes, there are other phones which are good (say, the treo 650), but I am talking specifically about the major brands (SE, Nokia, Moto, LG, Samsung, Sanyo, etc.). Just my 2¢.
