Motorola: G5 microprocessors will hit speeds of 2GHz

Discussion in 'Hardware Rumors' started by Shrek, Aug 4, 2002.

  1. Shrek macrumors 65816

    Shrek

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Nashville, Tennessee USA
    #1
    This news is kind of old, but I thought I'd post it anyway, just in case. ;)

    http://e-www.motorola.com/collateral/PPCRMAP.pdf
    http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/9909/24.g5.shtml
    http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0009/27.mot.shtml

    Finally some definite proof of the G5's technology! :D
     
  2. Shrek thread starter macrumors 65816

    Shrek

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Nashville, Tennessee USA
    #2
    Oooops. This isn't exactly a rumor. Could someone please move this to 'General Mac Discussion?' Thank you.
     
  3. obeygiant macrumors 68040

    obeygiant

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2002
    Location:
    totally cool
    #3
    skeptic antiseptic

    This IS a rumor until I actually see one....
     
  4. Sherman macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Berzerkeley
    #4
    I'm pretty sure this is a rumor, I mean, what else would it be?
     
  5. cb911 macrumors 601

    cb911

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2002
    Location:
    BrisVegas, Australia
    #5
    isn't Apple still deciding whether or not to go to IBM? i thought that i heard something about Moto reaching the end of their processor developing capabilities.
     
  6. Geert macrumors 6502a

    Geert

    Joined:
    May 28, 2001
    Location:
    .be
    #6
    Did somebody bother to check the dates on those articles???
    jeez, 1999 and 2000.

    Hello, we're 2002 now, any other, 'more recent' articles, that confirm these older ones?
     
  7. scem0 macrumors 604

    scem0

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    back in NYC!
    #7
    I think this thread is in the right place. But NEways

    This is not a suprise. If moto couldnt get the g5 above 2 GHz I think it would be the death of apple. By the time we get a 2 GHz PM Intel will have a 3.5 GHz p4 :)( ) - i dont like it any more then yall do.... Apple needs megahertz because not all people will switch just because of iApps, other PC users telling them to, and the OS.
     
  8. G4scott macrumors 68020

    G4scott

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #8
    OK. lets face it. The G4 is way behind on the Mhz scale. Most people are saying that 1.4-1.5ghz for the next generation PowerMacs is too big of a speed jump, but in reality, it's not even enough. Anyone who's skeptical of anything greater than 1.2 ghz because 'Apple doesn't do 400mhz speed bumps' can stop complaining about how much faster the p4 is. But... If the G5 is more powerful than the G4, and we get one next hear running at 2+ Ghz, we will have at least a 2x performance gain, and with a dual processor config, it should be able to compete with a 4ghz P4.

    My question is, how much faster can intel make the pentium 4?
     
  9. mrMahann macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    #9
    agreed need for speed

    1.4, 1.6 is about the LEAST jump we should be getting to remain even relevant. that way, we'll only be HALF of what is going on the intel side.

    yeah, yeah, what about work that gets done and who really needs all that speed but so many just look at the numbers. w/ X being as good as t'is, should we get some rockin' hardware, market share could very well double in a year or so.

    and, w/ the gap so much even teh p4 is doing more work at the high end.
     
  10. ewinemiller macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Location:
    west of Philly
    #10
    I seem to remember that when the p4 was introduced, Intel was saying that the p4's architecture would allow it to scale to about 10ghz. I don't remember when they expected to get there. Seeing as the PIII's core started out in the Pentium Pro at 150mhz and ended up at 1.4ghz with the tualatins (sp?), it certainly seems believable.
     
  11. pgwalsh macrumors 68000

    pgwalsh

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2002
    Location:
    Colorado Springs, Colorado
  12. boom-boom macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    #12
    Yeah the P4 may go up to 10 GHz but if moto can release a 64 bit 2 GHz processor late next year it will be competing against the Itanium2 which is only at 1 GHz at the moment it would be perfect for the xServe

    http://www.itanium.com/products/ser...ndex.htm?iid=ipp_browse+srvrprocess_itanium2&

    and BSD already supports 64 bit processors. In fact I dont think there is any processor manufacturer that has managed to get a 64 bit processor much above 1 GHz.
     
  13. ddtlm macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2001
    #13
    boom-boom:

    Yeah, the highest clocked 64-bit CPU is the power4 at 1.3ghz, but the low clock has nothing to do with the 64-bit-ness. Being 64-bit is really not a big deal at all, all it means is that the CPU can easily address more memory.

    Also, the "G5" will not compete with Itanium just cause they may both be 64-bit. Irrelevant. AMD's Hammer is 64-bit too, and will be available at SAM's Club a year from now. Ooooo.

    Moto will be lucky if they can outperform the Itanium as time goes by, let alone keep at a higher clock speed. Intel means business, and the Itanium II is a powerful chip.
     
  14. boom-boom macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2002
    #14
    What I am trying to say is when you start to get more powerful processors and other hardware inside the box you don't need high clock speeds, look at the sgi severs for example, I believe the Origin servers are running at approx 500 MHz but the other hardware that makes up the rest of the server is what counts. For professional machines Apple was going in the right direction advertising the MHz or should that be GHz myth but unfortuanly they failed to back up the campaign with the power, I would be quite happy to pay $20,000 for a mac system that did the job, but I am not willing to spend a penny on a system that won't do the job!
     
  15. Shrek thread starter macrumors 65816

    Shrek

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Nashville, Tennessee USA
    #15
    If Motorola released a 2GHz 64-bit, backward compatible, G5 processor in the very near future (sometime this year), then both Apple and Motorola would be way ahead of Intel and AMD!!!

    CHEER FOR MOTOROLA & APPLE!!! WOOHOO!!! WOOHOO!!!

    :D :D :D

    I know, I'm so optimistic, aren't I? :p
     
  16. Malus120 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    #16
    Re: agreed need for speed

    :sigh: Why does everyone think that the 2.53Ghz P4 is like Standard, ITS NOT. Jeese are you guys forgetting the AMD is only running at around 1.6-1.8 on their FASTEST chips, yet because they are so much more efficiant they can easily match all but the 2.53Ghz P4(and thats probably just cause of the 533 Bus and the fact that i think the athalon is still at .18 or .15 Micron while P4 is at .13 or .10). BTW do you even know how much one of those 2.53Ghz P4 Systems cost its like $2500+. Anyway my point is that with a faster bus and 1.4 to 1.6 Max Clock would be MORE than enough to combat intels best(especailly in Duel configs) and would easily be about equal in terms of price/performance(wounldnt that be a mirical). Heck if they get a faster bus even a max of 1.2 would be okay if the whole Proline went DP.
     
  17. davidc2182 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2001
    Location:
    Sin City
    #17
    wow do they need an update

    apple needs to update the whole line, just in terms of keeping pace with the wintel world, the pro line needs to have a major distinction over prosumer lineup power macs need to be running @ 1.5/1.6, they need to bump the new imacs to around 1.2ghz, the emac to 933/1ghz, they need the sahara chips burning in the old imacs @ 1ghz+, they need to get the damn powerbook above 800 measley mhz and the ibook needs a major revamp its so slow! apple needs to pump their new switch ads heavily with an added something like, with the most powerful macs available switching is even faster, etc. and i mean the next update should be like boom not one or 2 updates, update the whole friggen matrix, introduce DDR ram in pro line, faster bus speeds, they need that whole store page to have little new icons next to everything, and then they should be like (oh by the way) here's that pda or tablet pc you've always wanted. Yes apple is a software company but they need to compete in hardware until their market share gets to a point where they can let people create clones and not lose money!! sledge o' matic!
     
  18. -hh macrumors 68020

    -hh

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2001
    Location:
    NJ Highlands, Earth
    #18
    Re: wow do they need an update


    I've been thinking about this a bit, and I agree.

    Afterall, if you look at a 800MHz PowerMac + 17" LCD, its more expensive than an iMac 17", so why the heck should I buy it?

    If this buyer was interested in digital video, the PowerMac doesn't even have the DVD capability of a Superdrive, so you need to pay another $200 to add that. If you add in all of the other little widgets to "even up" the Specs between the two systems, you're talking about a PowerMac that's close to $3K to equal a $2K iMac 17". The only meaningful advantage that you would get are a real 17" instead of a widescreen 17", and PCI slots. Whoop-ti-doo :eek: I'd still buy the iMac 17".

    And that's what a buyer who just goes to look at Apple's website to spec out a system is going to conclude.

    Anyone else in the world has already heard the rumors are that the new PowerMac's have been "ready" and so forth for awhile now, so if they want the bottom end current machine, they know that its price will get better as soon as the new stuff is released. If they want something better, the same still applies.

    So Apple is stuck.

    Apple can't go on just trying to push back the introduction date forever, because that day will never come. It would seem that sales have either been really bad (wonder how many PowerMac's Apple's selling per day right now? <1000?), or Apple is holding back such a major jump that they know that they have little chance of moving the current PowerMac inventory.

    I'm hoping for the latter like the rest of us, but if it were correct, I suspect that Apple would be holding a major fire sale right now.

    But this assumes "something a lot better" in the pipeline. The fact that Apple's not been aggressive with pricing infers to me that we're in for not much more than a small speed bump.


    If Apple really wanted to more aggressively clear their inventory, they could throw in 3 years of service on .MAC for free.


    Just my $.02,

    -hh
     
  19. macwannabe macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 12, 2002
    Location:
    Wales
    #19
    Even if a 2.5GHz P4 is $2500+ it is still much cheaper than a top of the range Mac. The "Fastest" PowerMac (not even the ultimate) is £2500 over here ie about $4000!!!
     
  20. ewinemiller macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2001
    Location:
    west of Philly
    #20
    I think the $2500 is quite a bit exaggerated. I just priced out a Dell 4500 at 2.5GHz with components to match the dual Ghz G4 and it only came up to $1707. If you backed off a little and only picked the 2.26 Ghz you could save yourself an additional $260. Seeing as my 2.26 does my renderings in about 65% of the time of my dual 800 G4, you'd probably still be a little ahead in performance for most applications.
     
  21. BB2 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2002
    #21
    I know what the new generation PowerMac are

    I know what the new generation PM G4 are
    going to be.
    You can't order 800 Mghz and 933 Mghz anymore,
    because the so called "new generation Mac" is just going
    to be a replacement of those two macs with the already wellknown dual processors 1Ghz
    Apples aim is to optimize "OsX"so that "Os X" will work full power.

    Added to that just you can count on the usual upgrade dvdbunners, more memory ......
    etc...

    No G5, just dual processors.
     
  22. mrMahann macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2002
    #22
    Re: agreed need for speed: perception!

    perception! people just look at the top numbers, "hey, intel's at 2.5GHz... mac's way back at 1GHz..." if we were closer, then it would be less an issue. people would be much more likely to consider a purchase. "oh, well, mac is 1.8GHz... not too bad... hmmm but really, all i need is this one running at..."

    i know about AMD... the machine on which this message is being written is a 1.47GHz athlon. it SIZZLES. i consider an AMD box the best value in hardware today.

    when next i purchase a mac, its cause i know it will be fast enuf for my purposes, and the most important thing, the value is the OS. soooo much agreed if they fix the bottlenecks we'll get a real increase, have said so many times previously. 1.2, even dualie will be more than enuf horsepower.

    but, the key is perception.. and the GHz is the driving force behind that. to get people to come over, they need to see big numbers, at least in striking distance of the opposition.
     
  23. -hh macrumors 68020

    -hh

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2001
    Location:
    NJ Highlands, Earth
    #23
    Re: I know what the new generation PowerMac are


    Just tried a config/build on Apple's website and it let me save it without any warnings/errors.

    Of course, I was doing this with the 733MHz PowerMac that's available on the Educational Discount page for $1252.


    Now if they still have 733's laying around to be sold...egads. :(



    -hh
     
  24. tjwett macrumors 68000

    tjwett

    Joined:
    May 6, 2002
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NYC
    #24
    hello! this is from 1999. didn't Moto Canada just recently state that they have no future develop plan laid out for the G4 or G5. the Moto chips inside Macs will soon be a thing of the past. now that's a rumor!
     
  25. MisterMe macrumors G4

    MisterMe

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2002
    Location:
    USA
    #25
    Food for thought

    If you have not seen it, then you ought to take a look at this page from a LinuxWorld article.

    Oh, heck! Read the whole thing. You will like it.
     

Share This Page