whocares said:I think it should stick with G3, 4 & 5. Apple never used the 750 and 7xxx names, at least not from a marketing point of view.
Um, and Apple used the 65816 from a marketing point of view?!
G3, G4, etc. are all marketing names, it makes absolutely zero sense for them to be used as rankings here. MacRumors uses actual processors, not marketing names, and I don't see why they would change that.