mad jew said:A little bit of typing lag and that's it. It runs really well IMO. Interestingly, I can't see any performance differences between my 800MHz G4 iBook and my new 1.8GHz G5 iMac.
russed said:i find it fine and i type pretty quickly.
i think its widely accepted that the mac version is better than the windows one.
Yes, it can be laggy on both platforms. Word on Windows has more of a jerky hurry-up-and-wait kind of visual response, while the Mac version seems to be a smoother kind of tardiness I find the Windows flavor of the lag more distracting, but that's just me.mcarnes said:Runs fine on my 1.2 Ghz iBook. The mac version is probably better than the windoze version.
Yep, but i've gone through too many "Word compatible" programs over the years that produced malformed documents when opened on the real thing, or that couldn't properly read real Word docs, to worry much about that any more.But it's still Word, which I hate. Don't know why, but I just never got the knack of it. Very counter-intuitive, imo. And it's only a word processor for font sake. Photoshop is more intuitive. End rant.
iMeowbot said:Yes, it can be laggy on both platforms. Word on Windows has more of a jerky hurry-up-and-wait kind of visual response, while the Mac version seems to be a smoother kind of tardiness I find the Windows flavor of the lag more distracting, but that's just me....
mcarnes said:Runs fine on my 1.2 Ghz iBook. The mac version is probably better than the windoze version.
But it's still Word, which I hate. Don't know why, but I just never got the knack of it. Very counter-intuitive, imo. And it's only a word processor for font sake. Photoshop is more intuitive. End rant.
I respect the experiences of others. However, I have no lag at all.asqy said:i dont doubt that the mac version is very nice ...
but does the thing lag or what