My thoughts on the new design

Discussion in 'iMac' started by AppleMooseMan, Dec 10, 2012.

  1. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    #1
    For the past month I've seen a huge number of people who have been very critical of the new iMac design, i.e "who needs a desktop computer so thin"?
    Well I said I would reserve judgement until I saw this new machine.
    This morning it arrived, and I was blown away at how freaking beautiful it looks. Using this machine is just a blast; it looks like something straight out of science fiction. The 5mm edge looks great, and the bulge actually looks kind of trendy.


    As for Apple removing the optical drive in favor of a thinner design, I'm not sure if that was the correct decision in terms of the consumer, at least not right now. I certainly never use an optical drive, but I'd imagine there are a lot of people out there who still do, they want to view DVD's on their computer, they want to burn certain stuff to a disk, and yes some software still requires a disk. Fortunately though, this issue really is a small one considering how cheap external DVD drives are today.


    My two biggest annoyances about this machine are:

    1. The re-positioning of the SD Card slot. I find it a lot more convenient to have it on the side as I'd imagine a lot of you do.

    2. The lack of user-upgradable ram (21 inch), Apple charge an arm and a leg for their ram, so the inability to upgrade it is a huge annoyance. 8GB is fine for me now, but in a year or two I might need to upgrade to 16GB and I would have really liked that option.


    So to sum up: I firmly believe this re-design was a good option, I'm still quite astonished to have all this power in a machine that's this thin. I've been waiting for this machine since April and I can say it's certainly been worth the wait. It's exceeded my expectations! I'm ecstatic :)

    I'd appreciate your views on the re-design.
     
  2. Bargle, Dec 10, 2012
    Last edited: Dec 10, 2012

    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2012
    #2
    I bought the 2011 model 21.5 with an SSD and the 6770M card. I play games in bootcamp, so, unless I'm mistaken on CPU heavy games (like skyrim) I'm getting much better performance than someone on a 2012-13 model on account of bootcamp being run by the 5400 hard disk and not the fusion drive.

    Now that I think about it, in OSX my computer runs faster than the 2012-13 model because an SSD is faster than the fusion drive as well...

    and I have a CD drive which I need. The only thing I would have liked was the less reflective screen, but probably not at the expense of all of the above.
     
  3. macrumors 68020

    gmanist1000

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    #3
    I love the new design, but I just don't need a new computer yet.
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    #4
    It's not about hating the new design, it's about the idiocy of creating this design to the detriment of things like bluray/DVD drives. Show me one person that was whining about the last iMac being too thick and I'll show you a fool.
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2012
    #5
    I think it's great. If I was in the market for a new iMac, I would be buying this machine!
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2011
    #6
    As if there's a choice. There's one new iMac design.
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    #7
    Sorry; Apple put form over function with this iMac design: SD slot in the back, non-upgradable RAM in the 21.5" (unless you're reeeeeeealy motivated), and no more CD drive or Firewire (granted, old tech).

    Concerning the 5mm edge: like many have stated, you don't look at the edge when you're using your computer (well, I sure don't). The new iMac looks no different when in use than the last gen, so what exactly is the point? I understand thinner Macbooks, but desktops?

    Finally, the worst part: the base 21.5" model has one option only. Why Apple didn't at least include a Fusion drive option is beyond me (although "forcing" consumers to the $1500 model is not implausible).

    I don't hate the new iMac; I'm just really disappointed with it. So I bought a mid-2010 and dropped in a 120GB SSD and 4 more gigs of RAM; couldn't be happier and I spent half what a new one would cost. :)
     
  8. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    #8
    And 2-3 years from now you are going to come here to say how bad form over function the new iMac is and that you:
    bought a late-2012 and dropped in a XXXGB SSD and XXX more gigs of RAM; couldn't be happier and I spent half what a new one would cost.

    This is life, apple never did function over form, I think nobody really needed the 5mm edge but oh well...
     
  9. thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    #9
    Personally I have no need for A DVD drive, I have bought a cheap external DVD for the rare occasions when I do need to burn something to a disk, or install some software. I'd much prefer the slim body rather than a disk drive, but that's my preference. I think Apple should have provided the external super drive along with the iMac instead of it being separate purchase.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2012
    Location:
    Suffolk UK
    #10
    As a new Mac user moving from a Windows PC it is very elegant, and will save a lot of space in my study, once I have shifted out the old PC.

    I am not doing that until I am sure that I have managed to copy everything across.
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    #11
    I really don't understand why they kept the BEARD.
    That was the most ugly piece of the original iMac, but it looks totally shît on the new one.

    But I don't care. I used to look at iMacs as the were the only machines with affordable power, but now the Mini is faster and cheaper. For the price of each base iMac, you get a faster mini with better IPS display and free SSD and 16Gb.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2009
    #12
    Had no interest in an iMac until this redesign. So there's at least one person they won over by designing this way. I'm sure I'm not the only one.

    Maybe they turn a few people off... they'll go and buy a refurbished iMac. Apple wins either way.
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Location:
    U.K.
    #13
    Let's put it this way, if I had waited all year for this update as many people have, I would kick my own backside until I couldn't stand up for not going with the existing model. I wonder how any of the new buyers are putting a brave face on it when they say they're pleased? There are of course those who would buy a pig if it had the Apple logo stamped on it, so say it's great whatever.
     
  14. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    #14
    My thought is exactly!

    I did try out the computer for a bit at one of the Apple store. And it does look great and is super fast. But the user non-upgradable RAM is a huge minus for me. Slower HD speed and the squeezing down w/ more laptop parts just for sake of having a new design! Form over function on just not a few things, but a number of key features!

     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 14, 2011
    Location:
    U.K.
    #15
    Given the new and outgoing models are visually almost identical please give your reasons for saying this.
     
  16. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    #16
    Hah hah, i just had to laugh out loud at the pig part!

    ----------

    [/COLOR]Really, and everybody else but the user would be able to admire the thin edge! Unless u position the keyboard to the sides of the iMac!



    ----------

    The previous model was a great looking computer design wise already.

    And I really do think that Apple designers were stumped as to how to come up w/ a new design. And the only thing they came up with was to make the edge thinner! So they can say they have a new design to roll out!

    I would have preferred that they kept the same design and improved on other things such as the inside!
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    #17
    Your last statement doesn't make sense.

    I offered valid reasons to back my opinion, please critique those reasons instead.
     
  18. macrumors demi-god

    mmomega

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2009
    Location:
    DFW, TX
    #18
    Looking at the front of the machine it looks identical to the previous models, I don't see why a thinner edge is causing a problem.
    Apple products are meant to be pretty, they have ALWAYS gone the way of form over function with iMacs.

    Sorry boys but they are only going to get smaller.
     
  19. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2004
    #19
    For me, one of the biggest reasons against new iMac is timing of it all. I frankly don't think iMac needs to exist at all. Apple should instead beef up Mac mini to match iMac spec, and offer 21.5" and 27" displays, along with keyboard and mouse, as a bundle (with discounted pricing).
     
  20. thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    #20
    The "all in one" appeals to a lot of people, including me.
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2012
    #21
    This is a great idea, if you ask me.

    I'm surprised that Apple eliminated their 24" ACD from the line-up; must not have been selling well. I'd happily pay $400 to $500 for a 22" ATD along with a beefed up Mini (or the mythical XMac).
     
  22. macrumors regular

    zemzabob

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
  23. macrumors 6502a

    skippymac

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2010
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    #23
    I personally think it looks stupid. I'm all for making things thinner etc etc, even if I don't necessarily believe desktops need to be.

    However, it's not thinner... it looks pregnant! If they're going to boast about a 5mm thick edge, at least make the rest of the machine vaguely attractive!

    Personally I think they'd have been better off making the thing look a bit nicer, more practical and not having such a thin edge, then in the future when the whole machine is 5mm thick everyone will be wowed instead of saying "so what, they did that 10 years ago"

    It often seems to me that apple and other tech companies aren't very good at looking ahead...
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    aerok

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2011
    #24
    I just would've preferred if they kept the same thickness but got rid of the bottom bezel (chin). Design would've been 10 times sexier that way.
     
  25. thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2012
    #25
    40% less volume than its predecessor.
     

Share This Page