Nano 3rd gen vs U2 edition iPod, sound quality

Discussion in 'iPod' started by predsednic, Jul 19, 2009.

  1. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    15
    #1
    I have one old U2 special edition iPod, and one silver iPod Nano, 3rd generation.
    I want to keep one and give away the other, but I can't decide which one. The only thing I'm interested in is sound quality, because I'm going to use it in a room, plugged into speakers, as a sort of a low budget hi-fi system :p
    So which one has better sound quality and why? Thank you!
     
  2. macrumors regular

    no.1 Apple Fan

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    198
    Location:
    In a pineapple under the sea
    #2
    The U2 edition is sort of special. I wouldn't want to give it away, but the Nano is newer. I never did quite grasp why Apple made the U2 edition and why it was out so long.:confused:
     
  3. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    15
    #3
    Yeah I agree, it's an interesting iPod.
    OK maybe I should put it this way, which one should I listen to if I want the best sound quality?
     
  4. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2009
    Messages:
    42
    #4
    I would keep the U2 edition since original iPods will become (or are) real icons in the design world. And limited editions are always nice to keep.
     
  5. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    15
    #5
    And if I keep both, which one should I listen to for audio quality's sake?
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    Hrududu

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    1,731
    Location:
    Wichita KS
    #6
    Which U2 iPod is it? Is it the first one, the color screen one, or the video one? Honestly, the sound quality is probably going to be the same no matter which iPod its coming out of. The quality of the MP3 and the speakers is going to have more effect on the sound than the iPod itself. Music coming out of a headphone jack is all going to sound about the same. The only difference might be how powerful the internal amp is, and with a powered set of speakers, that probably doesn't matter much anyhow.
     
  7. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2008
    Messages:
    15
    #7
    It's the first one, the B&W screen one.
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Poncho

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2007
    Messages:
    298
    Location:
    Holland
    #8
    My thoughts: It's the quality of the DAC used in the iPod model that determines how good the sound is. So google around and see which of the two DACs used (they may be the same) in each model is the the better one. They'll probably be Wolfson DACs. However, as the sound from the DAC then has to go through the headphone amp, its 'purity' is degraded, so it's kind of irrelevant. However, I'd keep the U2.

    However, if you can bypass the DAC and send the raw digital signal through an aftermarket DAC, the iPod can sound tremendous. Wadia claims to have done this with its 170iTransport. Its pricey though, but reading here might give you a bit of background on things:

    http://community.crutchfield.com/bl...home-audio-tip-11-bypass-your-ipod-s-dac.aspx
     

Share This Page