Nature Pictures hidden in OS X

Discussion in 'macOS' started by AvSRoCkCO1067, Dec 18, 2005.

  1. AvSRoCkCO1067 macrumors 65816

    AvSRoCkCO1067

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Location:
    CO
    #1
  2. mduser63 macrumors 68040

    mduser63

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
  3. dotdotdot macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2005
    #3
    Here, I copied and pasted it for you:

     
  4. mduser63 macrumors 68040

    mduser63

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    Location:
    Salt Lake City, UT
    #4
    Thanks for posting that DotX3. I see, it's Ldopa.net (as in the medicine L-dopa) not Idopa.net.
     
  5. killuminati macrumors 68020

    killuminati

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2004
    #5
    I don't see what's so exciting, it's just the pictures from the Nature screen saver.
     
  6. mkrishnan Moderator emeritus

    mkrishnan

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    #6
    More websites should be named after anti-Parkinsonian medication. :D

    Nice find. :)
     
  7. tag macrumors 6502a

    tag

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2005
    Location:
    PA, US
    #7
    Yeah thats true but you can never have enough backgrounds:D . I did this for the Beach screensaver's pictures a while ago, but sadly they are only 1024x768. I didn't think to look at the nature ones, but at least they are some nice pictures with higher quality and at 2560x1600, it's just too bad the beach ones aren't of the same quality because I think they are way nicer than the nature ones. The Forest screensaver jpgs are small ones too. :(
     
  8. EGT macrumors 68000

    EGT

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2003
    #8
    I read the title as - "Naked Pictures hidden in OS X"

    Talk about anticlimax. :(

    ( :D )
     
  9. MacsRgr8 macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #9

    Eh.. me too... :eek:
     
  10. dubbz macrumors 68020

    dubbz

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2003
    Location:
    Alta, Norway
    #10
    *cough* Third... :eek:
     
  11. bousozoku Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #11
    Those would be rather natural, too.

    I'm not sure why people consider these photographs hidden. If that's the case, there are many, many hidden items within Mac OS X.
     
  12. skoker macrumors 68000

    skoker

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2005
    #12
    Got me too, fourth :eek:
     
  13. kainjow Moderator emeritus

    kainjow

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2000
    #13
  14. mkrishnan Moderator emeritus

    mkrishnan

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Location:
    Grand Rapids, MI, USA
    #14
    Now ever since I read the first person who said that, me too. :eek:
     
  15. AvSRoCkCO1067 thread starter macrumors 65816

    AvSRoCkCO1067

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2005
    Location:
    CO
    #15
    lol I know but that's what Thurrot said in his blog...so I posed :(
     
  16. bousozoku Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #16
    Following Deep Thurrott is a bad idea, in any case. He's quite a mercenary.
     

Share This Page