Navy launches deadliest and most expensive warship - with iP...

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Feb 2, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
    #1
  2. Guest

    ppc_michael

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2005
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    #2
    Sounds better than my dorm. :rolleyes:
     
  3. macrumors 68040

    Gasu E.

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2004
    Location:
    Not far from Boston, MA.
    #3
    Are Navy iPods limited to 100 db?
     
  4. Administrator/Editor

    WildCowboy

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #4
    Do you think iPods will be using the same connection hardware in three-plus years when these ships finally come on line?
     
  5. macrumors 68020

    combatcolin

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Location:
    Northants, UK
    #5
    Internet Access?

    Macbook Pro?

    (Sailor Using iSight onboard) Hi Dave, whats that noise in the background?

    Oh, don't worry about that Gary, its just the Cruise Missiles launcing, were blasting Tehren tonight.

    "Cool, Nice one Dave"

    :p
     
  6. macrumors G3

    bigandy

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Location:
    Murka
    #6
    i saw this baby earlier today when i was through there, and i must say it's going to be quite impressive...

    Among the battery of state-of-the-art equipment is a new Principal Anti-Air Missile System, which can trace and destroy hostile objects as small a cricket ball travelling at three times the speed of sound. Its range is effective over a radius of several hundred miles.

    that's something.
     
  7. macrumors Core

    Jaffa Cake

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    The City of Culture, Englandshire
    #7
    That's the Ashes sorted, then.
     
  8. macrumors member

    macjunkie82

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2005
    Location:
    Iowa, USA
    #8
    You would think, being that the iPod is so popular, the media could spell it right! It's not I-pod, IPod, Ipod, etc, etc!

    Say it with me...

    Little i...
    Big P...
    Little o...
    Little d...

    :rolleyes:
     
  9. 24C
    macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2004
    #9
    Yep and its stats looked impressive on the Beeb website, especially compared to the older Type 42 class.
    Nice to see jobs are still there in shipping, but imagine farming out the design to a Korean dockyard...might be a bit touchy. :eek:
     
  10. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Location:
    Columbus, Ohio area
    #10
    sick of them getting it wrong.

    Seriously. I-pod? Has the writer ever even SEEN one, or seen an ad, or seen a case for one that has the name on it?

    I mean, come on, that's pretty bad. It makes me want to find some British product and munge up the name really good.
     
  11. macrumors 603

    wordmunger

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2003
    Location:
    North Carolina
    #11
    Apparently the ship's not going to be completely fitted until 2009. What's the chance those iPod docks will be compatible with the new Micro-mini-holoPods that everyone will be sporting then?
     
  12. macrumors 68000

    Eniregnat

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Location:
    In your head.
    #12
    Odd, while I know the U.S. military (at least the Army) allows its soldiers to have iPods, I also know that their use is restricted. I remember boarding a navy ship and one of the seaman I talked to told me that the use of flash-memory drives, cards and the like were restricted. This would make sense, as I saw a Dell running the "big-board" in the com. room. I wonder how they deal with security issues.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    shamino

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Location:
    Vienna, VA
    #13
    Makes sense.

    Memory cards, portable drives and the like can be used to remove classified documents and to introduce virusses. You would want to keep them away from any secure systems, which would mean out of any rooms where those systems are accessed.

    I would be surprised if they were restricted from insecure areas (like crew quarters and mess halls).
     
  14. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    London, UK
    #14
    'Scuse me for being a pedant and all, but the article said 'iPod charging points' not 'iPod docks'. Last time I checked my iPod charger was a 3 pin plug, same as my kettle, my toaster, my tv... in fact all of my electrical kit. :)

    And given that manufacturers have to pay Apple for a licence to incorporate their docks into their kit, can you see the Royal Navy paying a fee to Apple for every battleship they make? :p
     
  15. macrumors 68020

    combatcolin

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2004
    Location:
    Northants, UK
    #15
    Eevn more intresting would be an Apple license officer turning up at Portsmouth demanding access!
     
  16. macrumors 68000

    Eniregnat

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    Location:
    In your head.
    #16

    My point, if you were referring to it, was that there are plenty of places where any electronic drive/storage is banned period. Sometimes with the best of intentions, people forget what devices are capable of. Heck there are plenty of companies that would have you check your electronics at the door, I was just wondering about how they restrict the access, or if they make a point to.

    There is a good question, I wonder what Apple charges for use of it's proprietary doc connector- a few cents per unit?
     
  17. macrumors G3

    iMeowbot

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2003
    #17
    I have a funny feeling that those "docks" will end up being shelves or cabinets with convenient airline-style power taps, all they'll have to worry about is adapter cables.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2004
    #18
    Somehow, I think perhaps Neerazan was talking to, perhaps, WildCowboy or wordmunger, and not yourself.
     
  19. Administrator/Editor

    WildCowboy

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #19
    So, by "I-pod charging points," they mean electrical outlets? Whoop-de-do.
     
  20. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    London, UK
    #20
    Actually, it was kind of a pop at whoever posted the title of the original link, which (as happens a lot around here) may have overhyped and misrepresented the facts as stated in the article itself. Seems a lot of people read the headlines, less read the fine print :)

    Knowing someone that runs IT systems on Royal Navy vessels, I can say with a level of certainty that they don't network tactical systems into the general ship wide open network, so don't panic on that count...

    ...they do run some stuff on Windows though...
     

Share This Page