New Antenna-Related Part From Upcoming iPhone Surfaces

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, May 9, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Earlier today, Nowhereelse.fr highlighted new part photos posted by Japanese vendor Moumantai showing what is claimed to be from the iPhone 5S or perhaps Apple's lower-cost iPhone. The part corresponds to an iPhone 5 part attached to the top end of the main logic board, but does contain some layout differences.

    [​IMG]
    Nowhereelse.fr and other sites have speculated that the part is related to camera functionality given its proximity to the front and rear cameras on the iPhone, but we chatted with iFixit's Miro Djuric and determined that it appears to be primarily related to wireless antenna functionality, although its exact role has not been confirmed.

    The corresponding iPhone 5 part houses a low noise amplifier from Skyworks that is involved in cellular connectivity. The part shown in the new photos also contains an antenna connector, which appears to correspond to one located nearby on the main logic board in the iPhone 5. That iPhone 5 connector is believed (but not confirmed) to be for the device's Wi-Fi antenna.

    [​IMG]
    While Apple has tweaked the layout of this part somewhat, it is very similar to the corresponding iPhone 5 part and does not immediately reveal any major changes for the device that will use it.

    Minor parts for the next-generation iPhone have been leaking over the last several months, although identification of the devices associated with those parts has been made more difficult by rumors that Apple is looking to introduce both an iPhone 5S and a lower-cost iPhone later this year. In past years, Apple's strategy has been to release just one new model while keeping previous models available at lower price points.

    Article Link: New Antenna-Related Part From Upcoming iPhone Surfaces
     
  2. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2013
    #2
    Hello to apple employees using iveOS 7.
    How about a hint in the comment section as to whether it is going to be a 5S or 6

    We know your watching us !!!!!
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    lolkthxbai

    Joined:
    May 7, 2011
  4. macrumors 68020

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #4
    My predictions for the next iPhone: thinner, lighter, same/better battery life.

    I should be an analyst. :rolleyes:

    EDIT: Sorry, forgot to add 'magical' to the list of features.
     
  5. macrumors demi-god

    Shrink

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Location:
    New England, USA
    #5
    Can you say...delusions of grandeur?:rolleyes:
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    #6
    "from-upcoming-iphone-surfaces"

    For a moment I was afraid that there was a new hybrid product on the way...

    But only for a moment, thankfully, shudder..,
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Location:
    SLC, Utah
    #7
    A possible antenna-related part of a possible new iPhone. I'm not sure I'll be able to sleep tonight after reading this.
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    testcard

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Location:
    Middle England
    #8
    Am I the only one here who looks at these leaked photos and thinks: "I have absolutely no idea what I'm looking at". I might as well be gazing at an X-ray of my spleen.
     
  9. macrumors 68030

    needfx

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Location:
    macrumors apparently
    #9
    so let HAL give it a look
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2010
    #10
    Tim Cook has definitely doubled down on secrecy.. very few leaks as of late.
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    #11
    I hope this is a sign of an antenna redesign so that there is a second antenna to take advantage of simultaneous data and voice on EVDO until VoLTE is a reality.

    A guy can dream, anyway.
     
  12. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    #12
    I thought soft tissue was essentially invisible to x-rays, thus your spleen wouldn't appear on the photo :(
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    JayCee842

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    #13
    Not sure if insinuating sarcasm...mmmm...:eek:
     
  14. macrumors 68000

    AngerDanger

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Location:
    Male
    #14
    You ask for it, and Apple delivers! Finally, the warbley-wobbly internals we've been craving!
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Nightarchaon

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    #15
    Maybe he has a spleen of steel..
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Location:
    Dutch Mountains
    #16
    I think the guys behind these photos are the same guys that made fuzzy photos in the past and than claimed to see big-foot or an ufo......:D

    ----------

    Wrong, it does using special liquids in your blood to make organs visable on x-ray. They do the same with kidney stones, but than with liquid in your urine.
     
  17. macrumors 68030

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2006
    Location:
    Aussie living in Canada
    #17
    Every time I see this it blows my mind how small they can make components now. Think back 20 years to cell phone antennae.
     
  18. macrumors 65816

    testcard

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2009
    Location:
    Middle England
    #18
    Thank you Doctor. :D
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    nick_elt

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2011
    #19
    could be full of cancer cells? thats visible on xray....
     
  20. macrumors 603

    bedifferent

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    Location:
    NY
  21. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    #21
    Along with many here I have been loyal to iphone for a long time but I sometimes want to scream when I see all these Android hardware devices that are leaving iphone way behind. It's frustrating that all I'm to expect is to add a letter to the new phone title and call it a new model. Give us more!!
     
  22. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    #22
    So I wasn't wrong, was I? An x-ray, on its own, by itself, without any sort of "special liquids" or kidney stones (which are not soft tissue) will not show soft tissue as I stated. :confused:
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    Dr McKay

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2010
    Location:
    Kirkland
    #23
    However if you were looking at an X-Ray specifically of your organs, they'd have put the liquid in ;)

    I can't help but feel we've gone off track here. :D
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Location:
    Dutch Mountains
    #24
    Well, I just double checked and they can see tumors without contrast-fluids as a 'shadow' in soft tissue. With respect to the kidney stones, they cannot see the kidney stones themselves (to small) but they can see any obstruction caused by them in the urine flow using contrast-fluid. Soft tissue does show up on x-rays, only less visible than bones and stuff. So I guess you are wrong anyways. :p
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2012
    #25
    Yes, remind me never to make terrible jokes on an online forum.

    This is mainly why I don't post very often, sigh...
     

Share This Page