New Damages Trial in Apple v. Samsung Set for November

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Apr 30, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Samsung and Apple will be heading back to court in November for a partial retrial, reports FOSS Patents. The trial follows judge Lucy Koh's March ruling that struck $450 million from the $1 billion in damages that were awarded to Apple last August, on the premise that the original damages may have been miscalculated by the jury.

    According to Koh, the original jury may not have had a clear understanding of the patent issues, which resulted in a lump sum award that did not distinguish between patent violations, making it impossible for the court to determine which part of the damages were applicable to each patent.

    [​IMG]

    Scheduled for November 12, the new trial could result in an award that favors either Apple or Samsung, depending on whether the amount is more or less than the original $450 million. The trial will be limited to the same evidence used in the original trial, which means neither Samsung nor Apple can introduce new information.
    Though a trial will determine how much (or more) of the $450 million Samsung is required to pay, Samsung is still responsible for the remaining $600 million from the original jury decision. Apple will also request both interest and supplemental damage, which could cost Samsung even more.
    Samsung requested a stay on the case in order to reexamine two Apple patents on rubber-banding and pinch-to-zoom that have since been preliminarily invalidated, but the request was denied. Koh did say, however, that a final ruling from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office could change her mind.

    The two companies also have a separate 12-day trial scheduled in March of 2014 to investigate additional patent infringement claims.

    Article Link: New Damages Trial in Apple v. Samsung Set for November
     
  2. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2013
    #2
    Does anyone care anymore?
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    mabaker

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2008
    #3
    Samsung is risking another billion. Good. Love them to get what the copycat deserves.
     
  4. macrumors 603

    Rocketman

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2001
    Location:
    Claremont, CA
    #4
    None of that seems to say to me that Samsung has to pay the $600m right now pending further sums as determined. The day of reconing seems to be delayed indefinitely despite the judgment and post judgment rulings substantiating the first $600m
     
  5. macrumors G5

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2009
    #5
    I can understand why Apple may want or even think they are entitled to interest. But given that the judgement amount is still under question (regardless of what part isn't) - I don't think they are or will get it.

    This is what happens when you roll the dice and play the litigation game (both parties).
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    Sayer

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    #6
    Hooray for Jury Nullification!
     
  7. macrumors 68020

    Squilly

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2012
    Location:
    PA
    #7
    The cost of lawyers is most likely over the cost of damages already anyways.... this will never end.
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    #8
    Well, they're not, and Judge Koh has already decided that the $1 billion was excessive.
     
  9. macrumors regular

    litmag01

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2009
    #9
    Are these companies trying to put themselves in the tank?
     
  10. macrumors 68040

    KdParker

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2010
    #10
    Hey, as long as the companies can multi-task and get out some new tech. They can sue each other until kingdom come.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2011
    Location:
    Ohio
    #11
    I can't help but think that one day, all the money companies get from lawsuits will outweigh revenue from their products.
     
  12. macrumors 68020

    Kissaragi

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    #12
    I certainly don't
     
  13. macrumors 603

    Stella

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2003
    Location:
    Canada
    #13
    Hmm.. slow news day.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    DesertEagle

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2012
    Location:
    /home @ 127.0.0.1
    #14
    Is it for real this time or are they just patent-trolling again?
     
  15. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    #15
    Is this why there are no new inventive products coming out ? The big boys are too busy suing each other ????

    Get over it kids and get back tor releasing cool stuff already :mad:
     
  16. macrumors member

    Benjamin,

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2012
    Location:
    Brighton, UK
    #16
    Mamma mia, here we go again!
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    notabadname

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    #17
    Here we go again.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    phillipduran

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2008
    Location:
    Iowa
    #18
  19. macrumors 601

    goobot

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    long island NY
    #19
    I dont think apple's lawyers work on the devices. But who knows i guess.
     
  20. macrumors 603

    thekev

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    #20
    I don't think they specifically requested this. The problem is that you are making up numbers when in the end they are based on something. Damages are not supposed to be assigned arbitrarily.
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    flottenheimer

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2008
    Location:
    Up north
    #21
    How much does Apple earn per day on average (profit, not revenue)?
     
  22. macrumors 68000

    SPUY767

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2003
    Location:
    GA
    #22
    140 million a day?
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    GoodWatch

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2007
    Location:
    Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    #23
    Really? This is so 1984! :cool:
     
  24. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2012
    Location:
    Scotland, land of the haggis
    #24
    No they don't, but for a lawyers wage they could probably add to their workforce of engineers.:D
     
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2012
    #25
    Indeed, but it occurs to me they may not want to release new stuff until these patent issues are settled thinking if they win then others will be more shy of copying design features
     

Share This Page