Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Wayfarer

macrumors 65816
Jun 15, 2007
1,225
601
Ah, some Core Animation at work! This is a sign of more great things to come.
 

arn

macrumors god
Staff member
Apr 9, 2001
16,363
5,795
Side note, when I hit the F key while the visualizer is on, a very small number in the far bottom left hand corner appears, and changes rapidly between 29-31. Don't know what that is. Any thoughts?

FPS (Frames per second)

arn
 

cal6n

macrumors 68020
Jul 25, 2004
2,096
273
Gloucester, UK
Yup. They play in full screen mode. The first one, lathe, looks like it responds primarily to the bass in the song like a subwoofer and seems to take place ina doomed like room. The last one, stix, is pretty cool, especially as it reflects off a mirrored floor like coverflow.

Side note, when I hit the F key while the visualizer is on, a very small number in the far bottom left hand corner appears, and changes rapidly between 29-31. Don't know what that is. Any thoughts?

"F" is for "Frame Rate"
 

atp

macrumors newbie
May 28, 2004
18
0
New iTunes Visualizers in Leopard

Cool, new Mac OS 10.5. New icons, desktop pictures and iTunes visualizers.:eek:
 

motulist

macrumors 601
Dec 2, 2003
4,234
611
[the visualizer's frame rate] changes rapidly between 29-31... Any thoughts?


Do you have the iTunes visualizer frame rate preference set to cap the frame rate at 30 frames per second? Or is it just that you're running older hardware and it's just coincidental that it happens to be maxing out at 30 fps? Because higher frame rates really do make the visualizer look smoother and more trippy.
 

ppdix

macrumors 6502a
Jul 6, 2001
616
171
Miami Beach
Dual Screens

I hope they are smart enough to make them work on multiple monitors. The current visualizer only works on the main screen where the menu bar is.:confused:
 

motulist

macrumors 601
Dec 2, 2003
4,234
611
I hope they are smart enough to make them work on multiple monitors. The current visualizer only works on the main screen where the menu bar is.:confused:

No, I believe there's a way to change that. iirc, all you have to do is drag the less-than-full-screen visualizer window over to the second monitor, then select to go full screen and it'll be on the 2nd monitor. (I know there's a way to do it, but the method I described above is iirc)

edit: or maybe I just did it by turning on mirrored desktop.
 

voidptr

macrumors regular
Jan 11, 2007
127
0
There's this cool app called Quartz Composer in the current developer tools. You can make amazing animations that play in QuickTime Player and as screen savers in the current OS. They can even sense inputs such as audio and react to them. You can find websites full of these compositions now. Wouldn't it be cool if such compositions could hook into iTunes somehow, someday? Just speculatin'

It's called iVisualize, and it's been around for a while:
http://web.mac.com/vogelbusch/Site/iVisualize.html
 

Chupa Chupa

macrumors G5
Jul 16, 2002
14,835
7,396
Woooooo. iTunes visualizers. :rolleyes:

Just give us Leopard already. Enough with the cheap parlor tricks.
 

ariza910

macrumors regular
Oct 19, 2002
192
1
So Cal
There's this cool app called Quartz Composer in the current developer tools. You can make amazing animations that play in QuickTime Player and as screen savers in the current OS. They can even sense inputs such as audio and react to them. You can find websites full of these compositions now. Wouldn't it be cool if such compositions could hook into iTunes somehow, someday? Just speculatin'

The Soundstream screen saver is one of my favorite screensavers in OSX becuase it reacts with sound input. Pretty sure it was created with Quartz Composer - works well in OSX 10.3 and up

http://www.pcheese.net/software/soundstream/
 

Malarkey

macrumors member
Aug 17, 2007
54
34
New Visualizers -- It's About Time

The default visualizer that comes with the current/recent version(s) of iTunes is horrible. It may have been cool in 1996, but...

For a really cool music visualizer, try the one that comes with the Xbox 360. Even the one that came with the original Playstation was more interesting than Apple's. And both the gaming consoles let you tweak it as it was playing. Why doesn't Apple have something like that?
 

3282872

macrumors 6502a
Dec 11, 2006
821
0
Do you have the iTunes visualizer frame rate preference set to cap the frame rate at 30 frames per second? Or is it just that you're running older hardware and it's just coincidental that it happens to be maxing out at 30 fps? Because higher frame rates really do make the visualizer look smoother and more trippy.

I'n running Leopard 9A599 on a Mac Pro 2.66 with 8 GB RAM, so I hope it's not my system as it should be more than capable in running a visualizer in iTunes. I noticed it was a bit choppy. I wonder why...
 

matthewHUB

macrumors 6502
Nov 29, 2005
499
4
Is it just me or does anyone else not use vizualisations? i can't stand them! what exactly is the point for them? You listen to music either while you're doing something on your computer or away from your computer... so why stare at a screen of junk?

M
 

HLdan

macrumors 603
Aug 22, 2007
6,383
0
With Microsoft it's completely reversed, their Mac market share is so low compared to their PC market share, they don't want to put all the effort into developing Mac software. Look what happened in the case of Media Player, as soon as someone made something that did the same thing, MS dropped Media Player and officially supported Flip4Mac.

I still fail to see any reason Apple should make Mac-Only features in iTunes, they have enough Mac-Only stuff with iLife.

Okay, you sound like more like a PC user because that's the type of defensive answer a PC user would give. If you were a true Mac user (and I don't mean using a Mac to run Windows and occasionally playing around with OS X) you would understand.
Leopard will be big and with marketshare for the Mac being small how do you expect Apple to get Windows users to switch if Apple gives all their proprietary software to Windows with the exact same features as the Mac and expect people to look the Mac way, it just doesn't happen.

I have co-workers tell me all the time, "I would have switched to the Mac but now Apple has given us some of their software I don't need to".

One of the reasons we are still sorta tethered to Windows is because Microsoft has dominated and dumbed down the Mac software making it useless for Mac users.
It would be a great business practice for Apple's iTunes, Quicktime and Safari to have Mac only features.
 

motulist

macrumors 601
Dec 2, 2003
4,234
611
I'n running Leopard 9A599 on a Mac Pro 2.66 with 8 GB RAM, so I hope it's not my system as it should be more than capable in running a visualizer in iTunes. I noticed it was a bit choppy. I wonder why...



In iTunes go view > visualizer > options, then make sure "cap frame rate at 30 fps" is unchecked. If that doesn't work then try checking and or unchecking the "Use OpenGL" option. If that doesn't work then open up activity monitor, make sure it's set to show all processes, and see if any processes are stealing a lot of your cpu power. If none of that works then you can check off the "faster but rougher display option" in the visualizer prefs.

But unless you're running a very high resolution monitor, there's absolutely no reason why your computer shouldn't be able to do a high frame rate with all the bells and whistles. If you aren't able to get a good frame rate on an average sized monitor then I'd interpret that as a symptom of a larger problem and or a major loss of computing power somewhere. Are all your cpu cores appearing in your utilities?

Edit: I just saw you're using a leopard beta. Maybe the relevant system components just haven't had their final optimizations done yet.
 

3282872

macrumors 6502a
Dec 11, 2006
821
0
In iTunes go view > visualizer > options, then make sure "cap frame rate at 30 fps" is unchecked. If that doesn't work then try checking and or unchecking the "Use OpenGL" option. If that doesn't work then open up activity monitor, make sure it's set to show all processes, and see if any processes are stealing a lot of your cpu power. If none of that works then you can check off the "faster but rougher display option" in the visualizer prefs.

Got it, "cap frame rate at 30 fps" was checked. Never really used visualizer before so didn't think to check if for any options. Thanks!
 

motulist

macrumors 601
Dec 2, 2003
4,234
611
Got it, "cap frame rate at 30 fps" was checked. Never really used visualizer before so didn't think to check if for any options. Thanks!

You're welcome. I bet it looks a lot better now. Your virtual acid trip will now be even trippier! :eek: :D
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.