New Mac Mini Benchmarks Show Significant Performance Gains

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jul 21, 2011.

  1. MacRumors macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Just like early reports on the new MacBook Air released yesterday, the new Mac mini is also showing significant improvements in raw performance over its predecessor machines. Mac mini web hosting company Macminicolo.net has obtained both standard and server models of the new line and put them through some preliminary benchmarking using Geekbench.

    [​IMG]


    The testing reveals significant performance improvements for the Mac mini, with the entry-level 2.3 GHz Core i5 model showing an over 50% jump in Geekbench scoring over earlier generations and the 2.0 GHz Core i7 server model showing even more impressive results with its Geekbench score coming in at well over double that of its predecessor.

    As we noted on yesterday's MacBook Air report, Geekbench focuses on raw processor and memory performance, and real-world performance will also depend on other aspects of a system including graphics capabilities and data storage components.

    [​IMG]


    The report also offers a few unboxing photos and some shots of the initial setup process in which the Mac mini server model offers to migrate from an existing server setup. Also noted is the fact that the server edition includes iLife apps, as the server portion of Lion is simply an add-on for the basic OS X Lion. Under Mac OS X Snow Leopard, iLife apps were not included on server machines.

    Article Link: New Mac Mini Benchmarks Show Significant Performance Gains
     
  2. Eidorian macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
  3. pewra macrumors regular

    pewra

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2011
    #3
    Why not use xbench? That does score based on graphics, everything else. Hopefully that would give you some more accurate comparisons.
     
  4. InuNacho macrumors 65816

    InuNacho

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2008
    Location:
    In that one place
    #4
    All the computers should have gone to the i series last year.
     
  5. dscuber9000 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Location:
    Indiana, US
    #5
    Aww, that's what my MBP has... :( :p

    Mac Mini looks really tiny!
     
  6. resnick macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    #6
    has Anyone tried to install Snow Leopard on it???

    Is it possible?
     
  7. Tones2 macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2009
    #7
    I wish they would add a hard drive based terrabyte option for the non-server based mini's.

    Tony
     
  8. AAPLaday Guest

    AAPLaday

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    #8
    The top spec mini getting dedicated graphics is a great move.
     
  9. holmesf macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    #9
    XBench hasn't been updated since 2006, and doesn't have a good reputation for accuracy.

    I wish they didn't require you to purchase the server model with two hard drives. If I bought this machine (it's the highest end model afterall) I would have little interest in the bundled options, and the fact you have to purchase it with two bundled drives just makes it worse.
     
  10. GorgonPhone macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    #10
    i have core 2 due imac and mac mini and they are fine once you bump up the ram..
     
  11. OrangeSVTguy macrumors 601

    OrangeSVTguy

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Location:
    Northeastern Ohio
  12. OrangeSVTguy macrumors 601

    OrangeSVTguy

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Location:
    Northeastern Ohio
    #12
    But not the Server model.
     
  13. holmesf macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2001
    #13
    Ugh, I didn't even notice that. What a horrible move -- they make you choose between dual core and good graphics, or quad core and poor graphics.
     
  14. AAPLaday Guest

    AAPLaday

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2008
    Location:
    Manchester UK
    #14
    Thats right. There's usually some compromise with Apple :D Maybe the extra harddrive took up cooling space?
     
  15. userblah macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2007
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    #15
    Would the quad-core and the discrete graphics produce too much heat in such a tiny enclosure?
     
  16. Archeus999 macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2011
    #16
    Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_3_4 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/533.17.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8K2)

    Lion does not support Word/Excel for Mac? Right?
     
  17. polaris20 macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2008
    #17
    I agree. While Geekbench is useful sometimes, it doesn't really give you the whole picture.

    And, as with any synthetic benchmarks, it doesn't give you the real world performance indicators.
     
  18. Prodo123 macrumors 68020

    Prodo123

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    #18
    Come on Apple, at least give the low-end the DVD drive so people can get a good HTPC setup for cheap!
    ...Then again, that would hurt Apple TV sales.
     
  19. S.Jobs macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2010
    Location:
    Pittsburgh
    #19
    i want the high end version. that is a great price for that performance
     
  20. 7o7munoz7o7 macrumors regular

    7o7munoz7o7

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #20
    Works no problem for me....
     
  21. GeekLawyer macrumors demi-god

    GeekLawyer

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2007
    Location:
    The post is coming from inside the house!
    #21
    My MS Office for Mac 2011 works just fine on Lion.

    (2008, also, but I've heard you can't install 2008 anew on Lion systems.)
     
  22. stukdog macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2004
    #22
    We tried to get it running on these Mac minis, not luck yet.
     
  23. SilianRail macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
  24. Kyle4 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Location:
    Canada
    #24
    My parents wanted a replacement for their older PC that died. I suggested the Mac Mini and they waited, but the new ones don't have a disc drive which they need. I like the specs but am not sure if they'll spend an extra $80 for the drive. It looks really sleek though.
     
  25. Eidorian macrumors Penryn

    Eidorian

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2005
    Location:
    Indianapolis
    #25
    Any more details on that?
     

Share This Page