New MacBook Pro 6,1 on Geekbench!!

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by Steve Mobs, Feb 5, 2010.

  1. Steve Mobs macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    #1
    WTF!? This can only be the real deal or a Hackintosh. Either way good news. :eek::D

    http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/view/210968

    If the first link doesn't work:http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache...2/view/210968+Mac-F22589C8&cd=2&hl=en&ct=clnk

    ----------

    My predictions for the Feb 2010 refresh.

    Future 13"

    $1200 - 2.13GHz Core i3-350M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 3MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics

    $1500 - 2.26GHz Core i3-350M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 3MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics

    Future 15"

    $1700 - 2.26GHz Core i3-350M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 3MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics

    $2000 - 2.40GHz Core i5-520M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 3MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics + NVIDIA Optimus + NVIDIA Discrete Graphics

    $2300 - 2.53GHz Core i5-540M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 3MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics + NVIDIA Optimus + NVIDIA Discrete Graphics

    $2600 - 2.66GHz Core i7-620M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 4MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics + NVIDIA Optimus + NVIDIA Discrete Graphics

    Future 17"

    $2500 - 2.53GHz Core i5-540M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 3MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics + NVIDIA Optimus + NVIDIA Discrete Graphics

    $2800 - 2.66GHz Core i7-620M, 2 Cores, 4 Threads, 4MB L3, 1066 FSB
    Intel Integrated Graphics + NVIDIA Optimus + NVIDIA Discrete Graphics

    No Clarksfield (4 Cores, 8 Threads). No ATI Graphics.
     
  2. Bumble Bee macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
  3. YoHo macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
  4. zorahk macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Location:
    North Korea
    #5
    That's the real deal, look at the BIOS and motherboard descriptions.
     
  5. Steve Mobs thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    #6
    I don't think it's a Hackintosh... it says:

    Motherboard - Apple Inc. Mac-F22589C8
    BIOS - Apple Inc. MBP61.88Z.004C.B00.1001251657

    I was configuring my ThinkPad when I found it. :eek:

    EDIT: zorahk just said that.
     
  6. sjinsjca macrumors 68000

    sjinsjca

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    #7
    Okay, I'll bite: what is the MacBook Pro 6,1? Is that the currently shipping model? Or is this a sneak peek at some new version?
     
  7. DaWooster macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    #8
    Downloaded the page incase Apple decides to invoke the NDA ban hammer on Geek Bench
     
  8. DaWooster macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    #10
    6,1 (and 6,2) are the semi-confirmed successors to the current laptop line. This is the first time we've seen actual stats of the laptop(s).

    Judging by the fact it's got an i7, I assume that 6,1 is a 17" or comparatively larger sized of the laptop family.
     
  9. Steve Mobs thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
  10. Blindphleb macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    #13
    Cool actual information! So tired of speculations.
     
  11. Matthew Yohe macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2006
    #14
    Mac OS X 10.6.2 (Build 10C3067)

    Sorry guys, not happening.

    (I'm probably wrong, I forgot that they do indeed use 4 digits in the suffix for new hardware)
     
  12. zorahk macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Location:
    North Korea
    #15
    that wouldn't be the first time apple has shipped a different build on a new model though.
     
  13. sjinsjca macrumors 68000

    sjinsjca

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2008
    #16
    and

    Thank you most kindly, sirs and/or madams.

    I think I want one. {lust}
     
  14. DaWooster macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2009
    #17
    Not necessarily, The designations aren't a reliable gauge of the laptop's size. For instance, while 5,2 is the current 17"; 4,1 was the 17" the generation before.
     
  15. jpefjr macrumors regular

    jpefjr

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    #18
    This is potentially good news. Two things get me excited about this - the first is that it's using a Core i7-620M instead of the Core i5. The second is that this is a 32-bit geekbench score and from what I've seen of the Geekbench scores on the MacPro 5,2 the 64-bit score are ~8% higher.
     
  16. Blindphleb macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
  17. Chrysaor macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    #20
    Unless someone went through the trouble faking all the information (easy to do with a hack), looks like the real deal.
     
  18. Steve Mobs thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    #21
    So that means this is very possible?

    15" i7-620M = $2300 - $2600.
     
  19. JacaByte macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2009
    #22
    I wouldn't want an i7 in my MacBook; currently they only work when tethered to a power outlet, unless you're fine with a 1 hour battery life. (e.g. there is no mobile version of the i7 yet)
     
  20. ttttttttttt9 macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2010
    #23
    Can you guys elaborate on your statements and the reasoning behind them? You seem confident in whatever it is you are asserting, but it really is not clear what that is exactly.
     
  21. Melodeath macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2009
    #24
    1) Who would currently have a new MBP? Seems like only someone in Cupertino
    2) Why would they do a test on this site where people would find it?
     
  22. Steve Mobs thread starter macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    #25
    Are you on crack?
     

Share This Page