New PowerMacs: Wireless Firewire

Discussion in 'General Mac Discussion' started by jazzman45, May 11, 2004.

  1. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Location:
    lawrence, ks
    #1
  2. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2004
    #2
    so what is the benefit of Firewire over 802.11 over 802.11 itself? this seems extremelely redundant to me, can someone please explain?
     
  3. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2003
    Location:
    lawrence, ks
    #3
    802.11b =11 Mbps
    802.11g =54 Mbps
    Firewire =400 Mbps

    I would assume that to be Firewire, it's got to be pretty fast...maybe not 400 like the wired...but still pretty fast
     
  4. macrumors 68030

    superbovine

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2003
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2003
    #5
    Read the article. They're not trying to use FireWire over 802.11x, but extend the protocol (IEEE1394) to a wireless standard as well.

    If this becomes standard, it'll mean wireless DV capture from a camcorder (presumably at least at 400 Mbps). I wouldn't count on this stuff appearing for a long while, though ...
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    thatwendigo

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Location:
    Sum, Ergo Sum.
    #6
    Here's the big deal... Traditional networking, like TCP/IP, uses packet-oriented content and it can come out of order when dealing with media like video and audio, and that's part of what causes stuttering when streaming across the internet or a LAN. IEEE 1394 (known as FireWire and iLink in its physical incarnation), does not do this. It sends data sequentially and without the need for packet wrappers if you're doing audio or video content, and so the only stutter will be if your connection hiccups.

    The reason 1394 on wireless would be great is that it would allow the same streaming behavior as you get from the link now, only without wires. That's it.
     

Share This Page