New reason for Romney loss: Obama gifts to Minorities

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by likemyorbs, Nov 14, 2012.

  1. macrumors 68000

    likemyorbs

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2008
    Location:
    NJ
    #1
    Apparently Mittens still doesn't get it. The reason he lost this election is not because of anything outrageous the Dems did, they lost because of the GOP's outdated platform that no longer resonates with the voter base. If they can't win the white house in a bad economy, i would hate to see how they will do when things are better. But that's typical Republican mentality, blame others for your own shortcomings.

    LINK

    EDIT:
    Let me also add that the minority vote would not have been enough alone for Obama to win. He couldn't win without the white vote. Obama won more white votes than black and hispanic votes combined. Granted that's because there are a lot less of them, but that pretty much proves my point.
     
  2. flopticalcube, Nov 14, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 14, 2012

    macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #2
    I saw this on the news and all I could do was shake my head in disbelief. You lost because your policies suck, not because of anything the other guy did!
     
  3. Guest

    Joined:
    May 8, 2008
    #3
    Just proves how sincere the '47%' comment really was, IMO.
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2012
    #4
    you'd think he'd have learned to hold his tongue, wouldn't you??

    doesn't display much wisdom, period.
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    fox10078

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2009
    #5
    He doesn't have to hold his tongue anymore.

    I know that one of the reasons I didn't like Romney is because he thinks that my student LOANS I'm paying back to government are handouts, and this comment really just proves more and more this guy is a complete out of touch tool.
     
  6. macrumors 68040

    Anuba

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2005
    #6
    O'Reilly quote from Tuesday:

    "Here's what I really lament. We're now living in a dishonest culture. The media is totally corrupt in this country. It does things it could never have gotten away with even 10 years ago. There are entire media operations that exist solely to promote ideology!"

    O'Really?
     
  7. macrumors 601

    Tilpots

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2006
    Location:
    Carolina Beach, NC
    #7
    Sucks to spend a billion dollars and not get what ya wanted, doesn't it Mitt? All those poor, non-white, handout taking lazy people outspent you. And won. Damn, that's gotta hurt. Tough to wrap your head around, isn't it?
     
  8. macrumors 68000

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #8
    The momentary state of the economy is not the deciding factor in elections, what matters is the trendline. If people are somewhat optimistic about things getting better, the incumbent has a darn good chance. High unemployment that is steadily receding helps the incumbent, the actual numbers (9% or 7%) are not that critical. We saw steady recovery over 4 years, not decline.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    #9
    Shouldn't Romney have already disappeared after losing the election? Why is he still on my TV screen? Ugh.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    Sydde

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    #10
    He keeps coming back. Can he ride a bicycle wearing that suit?
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #11
    This just makes me even more glad I didn't vote for Romney and the Republicans. Somebody needs to to tell how to play nice.
     
  12. macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #12
    And the GOP wonders why they lose and why they are losing the young vote???

    REALLY? It is because they make stupid communist like this showing they only care about old rich white guys.
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    NickZac

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2010
    #13
    Romney's idiotic "gifts" comment is one of the stupidest statements I have ever heard in my life. But here is some further literature to help paint a bigger picture. Republican Governor Bobby Jindal, one of most well liked Governors in the country [based on approval ratings], has no issues with criticizing stupidity regardless of partisan lines. In this case, he called Mitt Romney out and for good reason.


    (excerpt)
    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...won-votes-due-to-promise-gifts/#ixzz2CJveELgu



    (excerpt)
    http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/...nts-absolutely-wrong-014142107--election.html
     
  14. macrumors 68000

    VulchR

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Location:
    Scotland
    #14
    Perhaps there is some sanity in the Republican party after all.

    I want a t-shirt that reads 'I am the 47% 51%'
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2007
    Location:
    Indiana, US
    #15
    And people thought Biden was a walking gaffe.
     
  16. macrumors 603

    quagmire

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2004
    #16
    Sanity only shows after a party loses an election. Where was this during the campaign when Romney mentioned the 47% thing? I heard excuses for it. Didn't hear any prominent GOP member speak out about it. They all towed the line.
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2010
    #17
    This article hits the nail on the head. Were any of you awake for all those Obama TV and radio commercials? It seems not. Each one had a highly targeted message, promising some federal benefit to a specific group, whether it was young women, hispanics, whoever. And it worked. As the saying goes, the stupid man's vote is worth exactly the same amount as the smart man's -- but the stupid man's vote is a lot easier to get.

    Romney's message was about improving the nation as a whole, looking at the big picture of how to improve life for all Americans.

    Here, this describes the 2012 election perfectly:

    "Only in America can a president who inherits a deep recession and whose policies have actually made the effects of that recession worse get re-elected. Only in America can a president who wants the bureaucrats who can’t run the Post Office to micromanage the administration of every American’s health care get re-elected. Only in America can a president who kills Americans overseas who have never been charged or convicted of a crime get re-elected. And only in America can a president who borrowed and spent more than $5 trillion in fewer than four years, plans to repay none of it and promises to borrow another $5 trillion in his second term get re-elected.

    What’s going on here?

    What is going on is the present-day proof of the truism observed by Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton, who rarely agreed on anything in public: When the voters recognize that the public treasury has become a public trough, they will send to Washington not persons who will promote self-reliance and foster an atmosphere of prosperity, but rather those who will give away the most cash and thereby create dependency."

    Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012...going-on-here/?intcmp=obnetwork#ixzz2CKBvfbyE
     
  18. macrumors 68030

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #18
    So let me get this straight here.. are you saying that minorities are stupid?

    I would love a response to this (though I already know that I won't).

    Also with that, if a person or a group of people are told lies to sway their opinion on a topic, and they believe it, who is actually being stupid at that point: the liar, or those who believe the lie?

    If both, Fox News has been telling a lot of lies over the past 5 years, so I wonder who the 'stupid' people would be (especially considering you just read them and posted as such).

    The 47% comment completely falls square to that. So can you honestly believe that, especially if he just flip-flopped on something that he stated during his campaign?

    Again, this goes back to my question: Who is being the stupid one here?

    Again, I request your response to this.

    BL.
     
  19. macrumors G4

    Rodimus Prime

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2006
    #19
    ah that is cutie you believe that.
    Romney made it pretty clear it was about padding the bottom line of the rich and huge corps. His 47% comment and things like this proves how little he cares about people as a whole.

    Now you are trying to agree with it with more lies.

    It was more shown people were smart enough not to buy the lies being shoved out by Romney and company. A key part that something looks wrong is look at the backers for Romney, it should be a huge sign how big the mega rich were backing him and forking out cash. They were getting something out of the deal.
     
  20. macrumors 68040

    Moyank24

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Location:
    in a New York State of mind
    #20
    All Americans?? Really? Do you truly believe that?

    The fact is, he wanted to improve life for some Americans and that is why he lost.

    And I think I'll skip over the fox news opinion piece. The problem with the GOP is that they still can't recognize why they lost. And making excuses and ignoring reality isn't going to help them do what they need to do to even have a chance in 4 years.
     
  21. macrumors 68020

    Queen of Spades

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Location:
    The Iron Throne
    #21
    And of course, all democrats and people who voted for Obama are stupid! I'd absolutely love to see a statistical breakdown of education level vs. which candidate a citizen voted for, especially considering all the middle and lower class Midwesterners who voted for the party that would screw them. That seems rather unintelligent to me. Not to mention the plethora of statistics that show RED states take a lot more in goverment "handouts" than blue states do, despite all the "47%" crap they buy hook line and sinker. Any response to that?

    Citing Fox News, good one. That's not a biased and unreliable source at all.

    That's exactly what he's saying. Instead of examining the real reasons why the Republicans got beat again, he resorts to whining and calling people stupid, not realizing the irony at all. Doesn't bode well for their chances in 2016, either.

    Keep insulting and namecalling and see where it gets you.
     
  22. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2006
    #22
    Yeah, Obama had a highly targeted message to specific groups saying he wasn't campaigning to take their civil rights away.

    I guess that's how Mitt managed to make it a contest at the end. If not, it would have been even more of an Obama landslide.

    lmao. I wish there were drugs strong enough to make me think there was even a grain of truth in this statement. The guy got caught on hidden camera saying he didn't give a **** about nearly half the electorate. I must have missed when "America as a whole" was only 53% of the people.


    By nearly every factual measure we have the economy has been getting better for the past 2.5-3 years. You're full of it if you try to say otherwise.

    This is just completely inaccurate.

    George W. Bush is directly responsible for the deaths of over 6,500 Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan. He got re-elected. Until you start calling for him to be tried for war crimes, this point is invalid and just proves your bias.

    Congress makes the budget dude.

    Apparently you live in an alternate universe.

    [​IMG]

    don't worry, they'll just call me an elitist for posting that. but those are the facts.
     
  23. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    #23
    What I believe you overlook is that Romney's campaign was built on the promise of gifts ... 12 million new jobs, a more robust economy.

    Instead of "a chicken in every pot" Romney promised more dollars in every pocket.

    So it's rather ironic that he would complain about gifts.

    His whole campaign was based on that.
     
  24. macrumors 68020

    Queen of Spades

    Joined:
    May 9, 2008
    Location:
    The Iron Throne
    #24
    Pretty much exactly what I thought, and if that makes me a snob too, so be it. I'm not saying degrees absolutely correlate with intelligence, but his idiotic comment needed to be rebutted.

    Here's a tip for the Republican party: stop trying to impose a moral compass on economics. Stop trying to control a woman's body, stop trying to prevent gay people from having full rights, and stop trying to assume the position of moral high ground and get back to discussing economics, foreign policy, and government. The more groups of voters you alienate with fake morality judgments (especially when those minority groups are growing), the less of a chance you have to ever win an election again, unless it's a local election in segregated counties.
     
  25. macrumors 68030

    bradl

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2008
    #25

    Doubt that. I'm sure you caught the blurb on the bottom. For those that didn't:

    We now await the spin, stating that Fox News is an accurate and "fair and balanced" news source. :rolleyes:

    BL.
     

Share This Page