New Retina MacBook Pro Models Showing Up in Benchmarks

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Oct 23, 2013.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Following yesterday's introduction of new Retina MacBook Pro models, the machines have already begun showing up in Geekbench benchmarks, offering the opportunity to see how their raw performance compares to the previous generation.

    [​IMG]
    While several of the entries appear to be fakes, there are enough legitimate results to begin to get a sense of the new machines' performance, which arrive with the following 32-bit Geekbench 3 averages so far:

    15-inch with quad-core CPU:
    - i7-4750HQ @ 2.0 GHz: Single-Core 2844, Multi-Core 10887
    - i7-4850HQ @ 2.3 GHz: Single-Core 3100, Multi-Core 11771
    - i7-4960HQ @ 2.6 GHz: Single-Core 3379, Multi-Core 12813

    13-inch with dual-core CPU:
    - i5-4258U @ 2.4 GHz: Single-Core 2613, Multi-Core 5248
    - i5-4288U @ 2.6 GHz: Single-Core 2856, Multi-Core 5954
    - i7-4558U @ 2.8 GHz: Single-Core 3000, Multi-Core 6189

    As is fairly typical for updated machines, most of the benchmarks come in at approximately 4-10% higher than their predecessors, while the increased efficiency of Intel's Haswell chips has allowed Apple to improve overall battery life. Apple has also made the 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro thinner, matching the thickness of its larger sibling but at the cost of a slight decrease in battery capacity from 74 Whr to 71.8 Whr.

    The base 13-inch Retina MacBook Pro had shown up back in June in results from Geekbench 2 benchmarking software, which uses different baseline scores than the current Geekbench 3. A 15-inch model also showed up in early July, but with a chip that Apple ultimately elected not to use in yesterday's update. The chip in that early machine was Intel's i7-4950HQ at 2.4 GHz, but Apple bumped the high-end chip in the released lineup to the i7-4960HQ at 2.6 GHz, a new chip that was officially launched just last month.

    Article Link: New Retina MacBook Pro Models Showing Up in Benchmarks
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    Aluminum213

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2012
    #2
    will wait for retina Macbook Air next year, also the battery life on these are nice but not impressed with the slight increase in benchmark scores
     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
  4. macrumors Nehalem

    GoCubsGo

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2005
    #4
    Do I read it right that the 15" base performs twice as well as the 13" base?
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
  6. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2012
    #6
    17" ??

    What about the 17" retina macbook pro that I have been waiting for?
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    JayCee842

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    #7
    Yup same here, but I'm still going to buy this bad boy:D
     
  8. losthorse, Oct 23, 2013
    Last edited: Jul 15, 2014

    macrumors member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2012
  9. macrumors 6502a

    JayCee842

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    #9
    Yeah I think that's what I read, too :eek:
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    stockscalper

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2003
    Location:
    Area 51
    #10
    All well and good - we got faster Macbooks. But, Apple still hasn't done squat in terms of introducing any new products since Steve Jobs passed. They're just drifting along aimlessly just like they did the first time after Jobs left.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    jclardy

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    #11
    These new machines are certainly nice, but I am still quite happy with my 2012 13" retina. A small bump in CPU isn't really enough to get me to upgrade, though the price drop is certainly nice.

    I fell I will be able to keep this machine for 2 or so more years at least. But I am aiming to get either a Mac Pro or iMac at some point for video editing purposes and the other heavy lifting stuff that tends to bring this machine to its knees.

    I am interested in seeing the GPU performance comparing the HD 4000 to the Iris graphics on the new machines though.
     
  12. macrumors 68040

    Grimace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Location:
    with Hamburglar.
    #12
    How are the multi-core scores so much higher (double) on the 15" i7 than the 13" version?

    [edit: forgot that the 15" is using quad-core!]
     
  13. macrumors 6502a

    fenderbass146

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2009
    Location:
    Northwest Indiana
    #13
    yup that was the most important thing to me with this is post lol
     
  14. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Location:
    Germany
  15. macrumors regular

    SmoMo

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2011
    #15
    yes! This was my first ever notification as well :)
     
  16. macrumors 65816

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #16
    Dual Core Vs. Quad. 4 is twice 2. ;-)
     
  17. macrumors 68040

    ValSalva

    Joined:
    Jun 26, 2009
    Location:
    Burpelson AFB
    #17
    For a moment yesterday I thought Phil was going to surprise us with the return of the 17" MBP with Retina. But alas it didn't happen and it is sadly unlikely to return.
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    john123

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    #18
    Dual core vs quad core. Twice the cores = twice the multi-core scores.
     
  19. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jun 17, 2009
    #19
    dual vs. quad core
     
  20. Administrator/Editor

    WildCowboy

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2005
    #20
  21. macrumors 601

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2012
    Location:
    United States
    #21
    If you were considering a Macbook Air in the first place you weren't going to buy a Macbook Pro. :rolleyes:
     
  22. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2009
    Location:
    Germany
    #22
    Nothing else was to be expected. The 13" models have two CPU cores, while the 15" models have four.
     
  23. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    #23
    Yes the GPU should be much faster but the disappointing part is even though the price dropped the 13" also dropped to 4gb of ram in the base model where I think it used to be 8gb
     
  24. macrumors 68000

    john123

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2001
    #24
  25. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2009
    #25
    I wonder why the single core benchmarks are higher on the 15" when comparing i7 vs i7 when the clock on the 13" is higher
     

Share This Page