New "ultra secure" US Embassy in London

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Lord Blackadder, Feb 24, 2010.

  1. macrumors G4

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #1
    The US is building it's own castle of sorts in London, complete with moats and ditches.

    It like like a giant version of the Manhattan Apple Store. Apart from the moats and ditches...
     
  2. macrumors G4

    flopticalcube

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2006
    Location:
    In the velcro closure of America's Hat
    #2
    Nothing like a big fence around your property to build that "special relationship".
     
  3. macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
  4. thread starter macrumors G4

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #4
    It sounds like a real downgrade in location, but being next to MI6 is probably a factor.
     
  5. macrumors 68040

    velocityg4

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2004
    Location:
    Georgia
    #5
    Would it not make more sense to build ultra secure embassies in the countries which have constant political upheaval, harbor terrorists, and/or generally hate us to the point of attacking embassies with heavy fire power.

    This just sounds like a huge waste of taxpayer money. This makes about as much sense as putting the FBI's organized crime task force in small rural towns rather than large cities. The only reason I can see them doing this is for politics, England is arguably our closest ally so we will build our best embassy there.

    As far as need goes it would be better to build an embassy like this in Iraq or Afghanistan.
     
  6. thread starter macrumors G4

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #6
    We do. But I'll bet our embassy in London is one of the busiest in the world, and it would make no sense not to make it as secure as is reasonably possible.

    You obviously haven't heard of "Fortress America".
     
  7. macrumors 604

    Cave Man

  8. macrumors 68040

    RedTomato

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    .. London ..
    #8
    Now I'll have to go a bit further to attend the protests at whatever stupid thing the USA does next to piss off the world (Obama? Given time, I'm sure he'll come up with something)

    Never mind, I can do my fruit and veg shopping at the same time before heading back to my humble abode in leafy Bloomsbury full of communist pamphlets and copies of the Camden New Journal.
     
  9. Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #9
    A billion dollars.

    Got to admit, the design looks cool.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    #10
    I've been wondering myself what we would do next to piss of the world next. We're due for something minor at least. Maybe the Olympics would be a good time.
     
  11. thread starter macrumors G4

    Lord Blackadder

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Location:
    Sod off
    #11
    Especially when you compare it to the current embassy, which is in a nice location but hideous architecture-wise.
     
  12. macrumors G5

    Consultant

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    #12
    This is their secret weapon

    Was looking for the security guns that pops out of a box enclosure but can't find it.

    Glass cube... want! Probably made of layers and layers of bullet proof stuff.
     

    Attached Files:

  13. macrumors 68040

    RedTomato

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    .. London ..
    #13
    There's been two minor Obama pissing offs already.

    One was not following through on his promise to close Gitmo (but the world's media was full of carefully explained statements that actually it was more complex than he thought, and that Congress was dead set against him on this issue so it wasn't REALLY his fault.)

    The other was the troop surge in Afghanistan. It's still not clear to a lot of people just why the USA is at war with a bunch of goat farmers in the mountains on the other side of the world, or what they hope to achieve there. And Obama gave no clear timetable for getting out there and putting military spending to better use on the home front. Probably because in all honesty, these goat farmers look seriously likely to beat the USA in the long run, using homemade explosives and guns from 1910, and he doesn't want it to be on his watch.

    Next pissing off? Good question:
    - Copyright,
    - Net neutrality,
    - CIA involvement with Google's servers,
    - Gitmo (again),
    - Afghanistan (again),
    - Coverup of CIA torturing of EU nationals (currently going through UK courts at the moment, via a desperate rearguard action by the UK govt to hide the fact that that its own MI5 helped the CIA to torture some UK nationals).

    Take your pick boys and gals.
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    Arran

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Location:
    Atlanta, USA
    #14
    No like.

    For all its faults, the old building tried to fit in (size and height wise) with its neighbours. It only dominated one end of Grosvenor Square: Turn your back on it, and it was gone! The square remained a green and pleasant space. At night, all you really noticed was the flag - which was cool. The building melted into the urban streetscape.

    But this new bristling carbuncle. What to say? It looks like there was a dear green square on the site - before this "landing-craft" plopped from the sky, slap-bang in the middle. It positively screams, "Look at me! Look at ME!", followed by a robotic, "Take me to your leader".

    I know security's an issue, so why not just build the whole thing underground? Have a public park on top with a modest entrance pavilion. It was good enough for Apple in NY and I'm guessing the Londoners would appreciate some useable green space.
     
  15. macrumors Core

    miles01110

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Location:
    The Ivory Tower (I'm not coming down)
    #15
    It is. No one I know that has worked at the London Embassy has any desire to work at the new location.

    ...we do just that in countries like you describe. You just don't hear about it.

    Oh please. If you want to complain about wasting taxpayer money I'm pretty sure you could do a lot better than rebuilding an embassy in one of our most important military and economic partners. As the video states, a major reason for the new facility is that the current one is too small to conduct the amount of business that takes place there every day.

    Cost and engineering reasons.
     
  16. macrumors 68040

    RedTomato

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    .. London ..
    #16
    London's not Manhattan. It's difficult and expensive to build large spaces underground, especially in south London which has different geology to north London. I know of some large underground spaces in north London, but none in south London.
     
  17. macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #17
    There are large underground bomb shelters in South London,three at Clapham and one in Stockwell for instance.
     
  18. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #18
    Ooh the CNJ. You've possibly read some of the crap I come up with when not on MR if you frequent the letters page :D

    I think this is a great idea, if only because I'm sick of seeing Grosvenor Square so vandalised by concrete blocks and the like. Now if we can just get that corner of Regents Park back I'll be seriously happy.
     
  19. macrumors 68040

    Arran

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2008
    Location:
    Atlanta, USA
    #19
    Yeah. Hadn't realized it was so close to the river.
     
  20. macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #20
    When this monstrosity is build I'm guessing the wine bar in Vauxhall where the spooks from MI6 drink will be infested with CIA types as well,may well be worth a visit for a wierd night out.
     
  21. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2006
    #21
    I'll stick to the Tavern thanks :p
     
  22. macrumors 68040

    RedTomato

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2005
    Location:
    .. London ..
    #22
    I used to live near the Stockwell one :) It's basically similar to a long tube tunnel.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_deep-level_shelters

    It's not a cavernous space like under the WTC towers, which what the Embassy would need.

    Example of a north London cavernous space: Ambika P3 off Baker Street. http://london.unlike.net/locations/306919-Ambika-P3 - photo only shows a tiny part of this 14,000 sqft underground hangar. I had fun wandering around it in the dark a while ago. Worth a visit - the venue is better and more interesting to look at than most of the art shown there.
     
  23. macrumors 68020

    Peterkro

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2004
    Location:
    Communard de Londres
    #23
    It's the front line in the cultural wars innit,the freedom and diversity of the Tavern versus the conformity and colourlessness of MI6/US Embassy. :)
     
  24. macrumors G5

    Consultant

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    #24
    You obviously have not seen London's Gherkin building.
     

    Attached Files:

  25. macrumors G4

    Eraserhead

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2005
    Location:
    UK
    #25
    If they'd sold the old embassy in July 2007 for the £500 million it was estimated to have been worth the project would have broken even.
     

Share This Page