New Windows: Longhorn

Discussion in 'General Mac Discussion' started by shadowfax0, Oct 21, 2002.

  1. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    May 2, 2002
    #1
  2. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    I accidentally my whole location.
    #2
    [​IMG]

    What is MS's obsession with blue?
    Blue Dcreens of Death, XP's horrendous attempt at Aqua, blue blue blue.
    I mean I like blue, but not THAT much.
    I was hoping that XP was sort of a trial or something, but now I see that they're keeping with the theme, blech.
    There's three different 'themes' that come with XP, default (blue), olive green [​IMG] and silver, which isn't that bad.
    Jeeze MS, at least somewhat consider people's opinions before you release it, you made that mistake once with XP don't repeat it.
    If you're going to control 95% of the world's desktops, at least make it look good. Blech.
     
  3. macrumors 68030

    Hemingray

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2002
    Location:
    Ha ha haaa!
    #3
    Wow, if that ain't the most blatant rip-off of OS X I dunno what is... oh well! This is good, because it means Apple will have to do something even better. :cool:
     
  4. macrumors 68000

    SilvorX

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    'Toba, Canada
    #4
    meh, if its supposed to be out in '05, udd expect it to be alot different looking..but then again theyre gonna be redesigning the ui alot....
     
  5. macrumors 68040

    mac15

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2001
    Location:
    Sydney
    #5
    looks ok, now, needs refining, I wish we could see some new features, not refined ones
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    SilvorX

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    'Toba, Canada
    #6
    lol "we could see some new features"
    well thats pretty new ui-ish concidering this is a REALLLLLY early build of longhorn, about this stage of xp, it still had the same ui as win 2k (with win 2k about screen)
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2002
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    #7
    Looks like total sheeeite to me.:D
     
  8. macrumors 68020

    sparkleytone

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC
    #8
    in fact, the UI for XP wasnt settled on until a measly 6 months before GM, so this POS should go through many evolutions of plagiarised UI in order to stay current with MacOS.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    madamimadam

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #9
    It was the same deal with MacOS X

    You will all remember OS X.0 Server.... it was nothing but a glorified MacOS9.
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    madamimadam

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #10
    I loved the following 2 posts:

    By MacUser:

    It's gonna make me feel right at home. Those rounded windows, the dropshadows under the menus, the nice stripes in the display properties window, heck: even the duck login avatar and the "lovely new picture" in My Documents: it's my default desktop picture. And I just can't stop wanking to my clock. Burn DVD? sure! Haven't used CD's to back up my huge stuff for over a year now.
    No need to tell you just how much seeing these screenshots consolidates my world view. No need to tell you what inspired this 'new' look. Hey! No need to wait for LongPorn!
    get a Mac today and enjoy all of the above. And you know what? burning a DVD actually works. every time.
    want to see what I'm talking about? see this image:
    http://www.geocities.com/noms4me/macdesktop.jpeg

    By Shaurz:

    Right on mate. I'm switching to OS X as soon as I can.

    I mean it's the coolest looking thing ever, and it runs on BSD! How can you get better than that??? Well, three buttoned mouse...

    But I'm a cheapskate. My PC cost £300 to build, and you know how much Windows cost me, wink wink. Any chance of building a custom PPC system that would run Mac OS X?


    You guys rock :)

    Saying this, I do not know why shaurz is so anti-XP. They were speaking in a previous post about how they use the "classic" theme in XP but, personally, I would take the XP theme over the classic theme anyday if it was not so bloody slow under VPC.
     
  11. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    #11
    Dated Desktop Metaphor???

    I'm surprised no one yet commented on this little quotation, but maybe that's because no one scrolled down to the bottom of the page.

    PS : heres a quote from Pauls site that amused us particularly "Longhorn will feature a task-based (or "iterative") interface that goes far beyond the task-based interface found today in Windows XP. Microsoft has been working to move beyond the dated desktop metaphor still used by Mac OS X and Linux for many years; I explain some of Microsoft's early work on task-based interfaces in my old Activity Centers preview."

    I know that this is not necessarily the opinion of the writers; in fact, they say that this quotation from "Pauls site" "amused" them. But still, it makes no sense. For one thing, I don't see how OS X's interface is dated, and for another, I don't see how the OS depicted in those screen shots look anything less like a "desktop" than OS X.

    BTW, what size screen are these guys writing this site for? Anyone with an Apple HD Cinema Display able to read the whole page without scrolling horizontally? ;)
     
  12. macrumors 65816

    madamimadam

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #12
    Re: Dated Desktop Metaphor???

    I think they are refering to the way you keep your files and so forth on the desktop. In OS X this is an option since so many people compained about the fact that their HDs were not there in front of them. MS, on the other hand, just removed them and forced people to use the "Start" menu.

    I had to take the page to total full screen but my 17" LCD JUST made it.

    They must be in the 1100s or something.
     
  13. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2001
    Location:
    Sin City
    #13
    hey

    since i don't think anyone here would care about this question i'm going to ask it anyway, anyone know how i can get my hands on longhorn? i'm using xp and i would like to use microsloths latest and greatest just to crash the bugger!
     
  14. macrumors 65816

    madamimadam

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2002
    #14
    Re: hey

    If you find out, I would be interested to know
     
  15. macrumors demi-god

    szark

    Joined:
    May 14, 2002
    Location:
    Arid-Zone-A
    #15
    "Task-based" usually means an attempt to perform actions based on what you want to do, not on what program you need to load.

    In the photos shown, this would be indicated best in the second to last screenshot, of the "My Pictures" folder. When viewing the folder in Explorer, it gives you a menu (at the top left) allowing you to "View as a slide show," "Order prints online," etc.

    Instead of loading a program such as iPhoto, you can perform these tasks "directly" from Explorer without worrying about what program you need to run. Of course, it is loading another program to run those tasks, but the user doesn't need to know that (in a task-based system).
     
  16. Moderator emeritus

    edesignuk

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Location:
    London, England
    #16
    The pics have been pulled!
    hehehehe :D
     
  17. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2002
    #17
    Darn. Any other places where I can see those pics? Any1 save them? thanks.
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    SilvorX

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    'Toba, Canada
    #18
    loli know that, i can remember talking to one of the people who got to beta test xp in its EARLY builds...and this was back in '00 btw lol, and he was saying it was really fast...hmmm what happened since then :p
    n i was looking on a windows website that featured windows screenshots over the builds and the "watercolor" look was more popular with ppl who theme their xp than luna..

    ya i kno lol, i was posting some early screenies a few weeks ago of osx server when it was in its old school days lol

    and actually the server is down...they werent taken off the site...a windows site i go to posted bout the site being down...
     
  19. macrumors 68000

    SilvorX

    Joined:
    May 24, 2002
    Location:
    'Toba, Canada
    #19
    i'll start posting a few screenies of the yucky longhorn

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  20. macrumors 65816

    groovebuster

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2002
    Location:
    3rd rock from the sun...
    #20
    Reminds me a little bit of OpenDoc, but just approaching from the other side...

    I doubt that this could be reall useful for the user. Actually you are never aware which program you are using for what and Joe Sixpack would be totally confused what he could do with the machine or not... "Why do I have to install a proggy for that? I thought Windows can do that anyway, so that at my neighbours PC!"

    Someone was saying that he doesn't know why the UI of MacOS X isn't outdated...

    Well, the answer is simple. Maybe they made it look cool, but the functionailty and concept is ancient meanwhile. A "2-D" window system dates back to the 70's. They added a few things over the years here and there, but in particular they are circling around themselves since a long time. I can't believe that the current concept fur the Computer UI can't be topped, considering the improved capabilities of current hardware. It's like thinking the world is flat, until they find out it's not... We are blind for new ideas because we are too used to the way computers are these days.
    When we can't imagine something it doesn't mean it isn't possible...

    I wish they would try a really different approach to the UI and revolutionize the way you use computers... The current experience is OK, but I am sure there are ways to make it way more ergonomic.

    So far MacOS X is "just" a MacOS 9 in a new dress (regarding the UI)... No innovation at all!

    groovebuster
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    FattyMembrane

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2002
    Location:
    bat country
    #21
    OpenDoc was the greatest advancement in application/document design EVER CREATED! i dont say this lightly, but it was incredibly stupid of apple to kill it. i doubt ms could come up with anything like opendoc (apple/ibm still hold all the patents anyway) and although screenshots don't give away much about the features of a system, i doubt that windows will have anything extrordinary. as far as "task-based" systems go, have you ever seen the dancing paperclip? that's task based computing. the ms definition of task based means abstracting the user as far as possible from the workings of the system, which is not a bad idea if you just need to surf the web and type papers, but will get in the way if you need to do anything serious.

    i absolutely agree with groovebuster about the sore need for a new way of thinking about computer interfaces. it seems that the tech industry has been quite slackard about the whole issue. i think that a 2-D screen is the way to go for logistical/speed purposes, but window/icon/menu/mouse has been around for far too long with no change.

    p.s. look at the "change visual preferences for your pc" window in one of those screenshots. now open up your system prefs app and compare the screen real estate and how many other things you can do with sysprefs. ms seriously needs to work on streamlining the whole thing
     
  22. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2002
    Location:
    Phoenix, AZ
    #22
    Well, I know what you mean, because I have wondered the same thing to myself, but I also wonder what the limits are to the practicality of a UI radically different from what we have.

    I'm thinking back to movies I've seen in which the UI's were nothing like anything I've ever seen, and I don't know that I would enjoy using computers like that.

    For instance, in Hackers (I think it was, or maybe Matrix), they showed the character searching on the Internet or on his hard drive, and there was this montage of articles from newspapers, magazines, etc., just jumping up to the front of the screen like so many different colors and shapes in a computer display test. That looks neat in the movies, but I wouldn't want that on my computer. It would make no sense and be totally impractical. Then there's Minority Report, in which you have to put on these special gloves with electronic gadgets on them and perform some kind of Tai Chi routine — standing up and waving your arms all over the place — to look through pictures and videos. Again, it looks dramatic in the movies, but I don't see myself doing that anytime soon, especially not if I'm using my laptop in bed, or on the bus, train, plane, at school. I mean, sure, we could use more exercise, and a sedentary lifestyle is a factor in disease, but there's just not enough room on a plane to do Tai Chi just to interface with your computer!

    And then there's the question of the limits of practicality in industrial design. Sure, I've sometimes wondered why we can't break out of the whole rectangular theme we've got going, too. But what would be the alternative? A round display with round windows? You lose to much prime real estate when you make spaces round. Same with triangular or any other shape. The best shape for archtectural spaces and documents (be they text, picture, or video) is rectangular.

    And what's so great about 3D? Life is 3D, I know, but I don't expect my computer's UI to be. One of the benefits of a computer is that it takes the three-dimensional world and compresses it into two dimensions. I've read where MS said they were going to make the UI like an office metaphor, where you could "walk through" your computer, go to a file cabinet, pull a drawer, pull out a document… please! If I wanted to go to that much trouble, I may as well be working with parchment and quill. I get plenty of 3D in the real world. I'm perfectly happy to have a 2D computer UI. I once tried a 3D UI for OS X, and I thought it was a waste of time. I do admire the effort, though, and I don't doubt that there might be a better way to interact with a computer than what we have today. All I'm saying is: don't knock it just because it's old. Sometimes what's old is still around today because it's "tried & true." :cool:
     
  23. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2002
    Location:
    here, there, who knows
    #23
    Who cares!!!

    I saw the picts

    no matter how you look at it still winblows SH*T XP-2000-95-98 no matter how you call it is sh*t and still a bad copy of OS X or OS 9

    Cheers:D
     
  24. macrumors 6502a

    FattyMembrane

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2002
    Location:
    bat country
    #24
    i've been checking out some other longhorn screenshots, but have been unable to see any key new features aside from window translucency and a new filesystem that supports metadata (these advances are simply amazing, i can't wait until we get stuff like this in osx). but there is one thing that i have found troubling for a while and since this is kind of a windows thread, i'll ask it here.

    we're all familiar with the WINE project that allows windows apps to run in linux (check out www.lindows.com) and that xp can run many windows 95 apps, even though the systems are pretty different. why then do we have to run classic apps in emulation? i don't know enought about programming to speculate on the reasons, so feel free to shoot me down and label me an idiot. :D
     
  25. macrumors 6502a

    FattyMembrane

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2002
    Location:
    bat country
    #25
    we're all familiar with the WINE project that allows windows apps to run in linux (check out www.lindows.com) and that xp can run many windows 95 apps, even though the systems are pretty different. why then do we have to run classic apps in emulation? i don't know enought about programming to speculate on the reasons, so feel free to shoot me down and label me an idiot. :D

    edit: check out this article i found about longhorn:
    http://www.osopinion.com/perl/story/19338.html
    then check out the responses on the messageboard, keeping in mind that these are WINDOWs users
    http://www.osopinion.com/perl/board...ck&thread=5495&id=5683&display=1#message_5683
     

Share This Page