Nidal Hasan trial in Ft Hood already a joke

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by PracticalMac, Aug 8, 2013.

  1. PracticalMac, Aug 8, 2013
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2013

    macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #1
    Nidal Hasan, the turncoat domestic murder ADMITS to the crime, and WANTS the death penalty. :mad:

    Yet court refuses to accept this and enters a Not Guilty plea "on his behalf". :mad::mad::mad:

    The way I see it is:
    He represents himself, yet the court does not recognize him and says what they please, making this a kangaroo court, meaningless, unethical and likely immoral.

    Instead of accepting his plea hang the bastard (better yet strap a bomb on him) he is doing a successful attack on US military legal system (which already is damaged).

    He is not mental
    He is avowed mujahedin
    He is preventing his "defense team" from defending him.
    He wants to be killed (and a martyr).
    It's costing millions.

    He needs a deep hole in ground now where sun don't shine, be it alive or dead, not given another venue to mock peace loving, accepting (not just tolerating) people.


    This is sick, really sick. :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:
     
  2. macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #2
    'Peace loving accepting people' aren't usually walking around with lethal weapons in my experience.
     
  3. macrumors G3

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #3
    I don't understand. Usually the military has no problem with harsh judgement for harsh crimes.

    PS- it should be "trial". :p
     
  4. macrumors 6502

    lannister80

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2009
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #4
    Why not blow him up at a wedding with a drone missile? :rolleyes:


    America? Peace-loving? lololololololololololol
     
  5. thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #5
    Nor do I, so why are they forcing this trial?

    Just accept his guilty please and shoot him. Finished in 1/2 hour.

    Compared to some in middle east, America is a combaya love fest (minus the political name calling)

    ----------

    A pencil can be lethal weapon.

    And they are usually crazy.
     
  6. macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #6
    So basically he wants to become a martyr and you want the military to help him with that...

    Better to let his defence team do their job and hopefully get him life in prison instead of giving him what he wants with the death penalty and a chance to become a martyr and recruiting tool for more terrorists.
     
  7. macrumors G3

    Huntn

    Joined:
    May 5, 2008
    Location:
    The Misty Mountains
    #7
    I understand the politics and as a rule I am anti-death penalty. It just seems odd because my impression is that the military view of judgement is usually uncompromising.
     
  8. macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #8
    It's very likely that America has killed the most innocent people around the world since WW2.

    Calling for a trial to be cut short and a defendant shot - you must be one of those 'peaceful accepting' Americans you were talkin' about.


    Car can be lethal weapin and is a usually crazy tooo.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #9
    Some people deserve to die, others deserve to live their entire lives in an isolation cell with alternating pornography/mohammad wallpaper and having backstreet boys playing on loop for the rest of their lives.
     
  10. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    FL
    #10
    Wait a second. This crime was deemed by our government as work place violence and not a terrorist attack. So if he is not a terrorist then how can he be a martyr if we put him to death?
     
  11. macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #11
    His reasoning for the attacks was he didn't want to have to go and kill other muslims, so whatever the government classifies the attack as he and probably lots of radicals in the middle east will see him as defending Islam. And if the US government kills him for that then it will be a great recruiting tool for radicals.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Location:
    FL
    #12
    Please. That is a crock. If that is the case then we should of never killed Osama or any of these guys http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/...terrorist-threats-killed-or-indicted-in-2012/

    Maybe our nobel peace prize winning president can announce that we will no longer kill terrorist because they will then stop recruiting people. :rolleyes:
     
  13. macrumors 68020

    miloblithe

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2003
    Location:
    Washington, DC
    #13
    I disagree. I think it's a great trail. There's a lovely waterfall just after the 3 mile point on the left side, and the view from the mountain at mile 6 is spectacular.
     
  14. thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #14
    I am pretty sure Stalin (CCCP) is the king of killing innocents, with Hitler (Nazi) not far behind, but for sure America is guilty of some atrocities, don't deny that.


    I did not say cut trial short, just efficient.
    Ask defendant if Guilty
    Defendant says yes.
    Bunch of lawyers review it for procedural correctness (while fresh), if good, to next step.
    Ask defendant if he wants to appeal, he says NO.
    Case closed.
    Sentence pronounced.

    To say a trial cannot be correctly, with all the same steps as other, done in 1/2 hour is missing the point. It has been 2 years of preparation, and the defendant agrees with everything he is charged with, so the trial is merely making the record as fact.


    And yes, some crazy used a car in Venice Beach, CA.
    I think you are saying all Americans are crazy.
     
  15. thread starter macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    #15
    Military is already set to do that.
    I did suggest a deep hole for him, dead or ALIVE.

    Yes sir, the US Gub wants to make him a martyr, and is doing a terrible job at it too.

    I would have accepted his guilty plea and sentenced him to life in solitary confinement. A cell in YUCCA MOUNTAIN, just a shower and hole, cold floor to sleep on.
    Food in tasteless pill form, made with bacon.
    Upgrade to feeding tube if need be.
     
  16. macrumors 68000

    hulugu

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Location:
    the faraway towns
    #16
    Amendment VIII, US Constitution.
     
  17. macrumors 603

    mrkramer

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Location:
    Somewhere
    #17
    If it was possible to capture any of those guys alive, especially Osama we shouldn't have killed them. Locking them up in jail for life does the same damage to the terrorist networks as killing them, but it doesn't give the benefit to the terrorists of using them as a martyr and a recruiting tool.
     
  18. macrumors 68000

    4JNA

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2006
    Location:
    looking for trash files
    #18

    damn. that's pure evil genius right there.
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #19
    An astonishing statement to make.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_genocides_by_death_toll

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass_killings_under_Communist_regimes


    Here's just one excerpt, regarding Cambodia:

    That is more than a million directly executed, with an additional 1-1.5 million worked/starved to death.
     
  20. macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #20
  21. macrumors 6502a

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #21
    Since I can't read and don't know when WW2 was, enlighten me regarding your estimate.
     
  22. macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #22
    Estimate of what. You don't seem to understand the original statement.
     
  23. macrumors 6502a

    jnpy!$4g3cwk

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2010
    #23
    How many innocent people around the world has America has killed since WW2?

    Is this a Common Core English test question? Sorry, I don't see the trick.

    N="Number of innocent people around the world has America has killed since WW2."

    N = ?
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    Zombie Acorn

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Location:
    Toronto, Ontario
    #24
    I don't understand the statement either, can you please provide the number of innocent people that America has killed first hand since WW2?
     
  25. macrumors 68020

    niuniu

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2009
    Location:
    A man of the people. The right sort of people.
    #25
    Why did you post a link to genocides pre-WW2 and then an example of a homeland genocide post-WW2?

    If you have an example of a regime that you think has killed more people around the world (ie. not on their home territory), than America - then get on with it.

    ----------

    No I can't provide the exact number. But do feel free to make a claim for another country that has killed more innocent people since WW2 around the world (ie. not on their home territory).
     

Share This Page