Let's hope they bring the 13" rMBP out with dedicated graphics, I'll be all over it like a rash.
The rMBP has had hadwaree stripped out of it as compared to the cMBP. Look at the difference in battery capacity between the cMBP and the rMBP. Also, look at the battery size difference between the iPad 2 and iPad 3 to maintain the same battery life.
I'm not saying a Retina Air is not technically feasible, I'm saying it would increase the weight and thickness as there is nothing left to strip out of an Air.
You may put a retina display on the Air, and that would require a redesign. There are some factors that should be taken into consideration: (1) Haswell will consume less battery than Ivy Bridge and, should Intel be believed, far less battery, so there will be spare battery for the display; (2) Apple can cut corners of the MBA and reduce the bezel to make its body lighter, so it can handle a bigger battery without gaining any weight; (3) Apple can use improved display technology (which was not available last year) to make the display consume less battery (such as IGZO); (4) Apple could (although it probably won't happen) use lighter materials than aluminium.
As for the USB issue being fixed, I think we can take that as a given.But will Apple take the chance that the issue is fixed before making a major announcement promoting a new revised MBP with Haswell?
Intel will have to give Apple proof positive that the issues have been resolved. Will this push back Apple's adoption and announcement?
Are there other issues with this new chipset? Not sure but we will see soon.....
Did Apple start production with Haswell before Intel fixed the USB issues? Will they have to start production again?
I ordered a 13 inch Retina MacBook Pro recently. Should I cancel my order and wait for WWDC?
There was me hoping iOS 7 would be the highlight of WWDC...
If I were going to buy a MacBook Pro today, I would be leaning towards a cMBP with SSD. Some people still need the optical drive and if I have to carry an external optical drive with me, that cuts out some of the weight savings of the rMBP and it would add bulk. I can only see a preference for the HD if someone needs a lot of data with them and can't afford a large SSD.
And yes the matte option is good, especially at the resolution that option provides.
Although I will agree that the cMBP is not a flagship model.
Your number 2 reason makes no sense. The bezel on the Air is larger to accomodate a larger battery. Cut the bezel off the Air, and there is less room in the body for a battery.
What corners are left to cut? Oh yeah, they could solder chips for the SSD onto the logic board instead of having the SSD be a blade.While this is probably true, there are ways to cut corners off the MBA and to better take advantage of the space inside the laptop.
There was me hoping iOS 7 would be the highlight of WWDC...
Imagine if they pull what happened with iTunes 11. "Oh sorry, wait another month you ****s".
Disappointing. Very disappointing. No rMBA. Delayed Haswell rMBP. And the cMBP will continue in production. I hope Kuo is wrong this time.
There is demand everywhere for true 4K Blu Ray, which the BDA is studying now.
Why? And what are you looking for?They'd better have something new in May, not June....
If I were going to buy a MacBook Pro today, I would be leaning towards a cMBP with SSD. Some people still need the optical drive and if I have to carry an external optical drive with me, that cuts out some of the weight savings of the rMBP and it would add bulk. I can only see a preference for the HD if someone needs a lot of data with them and can't afford a large SSD.
And yes the matte option is good, especially at the resolution that option provides.
Although I will agree that the cMBP is not a flagship model.
Bought my 15" MacBook Pro in November 2011, and the Retina wasn't available. I was disappointed when the Retina came out, until I researched it. No optical drive (I burn DVDs for clients, as well as enjoy watching and copying my DVDs). Non upgradeable drive or memory. Also, while most software has been upgraded to Retina, there is still work to do.
My total investment was under $1950, including tax, and that includes 16GB of RAM, a hybrid Momentus XT 750 GB drive which combines FLASH with a 7200 rpm drive with 6 Gigabit Link Speed. Mine is a Quad Core 2.2 i7. Current non-Retinas are 2.3, and the current 15" Retina starts at 2.4, which processor is only 9% faster than mine, and only 4% faster than today's non-Retina.
If you do both of the above upgrades on a non-Retina today, the upgrades cost about $200 TOTAL, which keeps the price under $2000 INCLUDING the upgrades, and you have a 2.3 instead of a 2.4 processor Quad Core i7.
Try configuring a 15" Retina with 16GB of ram, an optical drive, and at least 750GB of storage. Any modified Retina MUST be ordered through Apple, so you have to pay sales tax. Total price before tax is $3178, and in California it would cost me $3464 with tax.
Is it faster? Yes.
Is it worth over $1500 extra? I think not.