Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Tilpots

macrumors 601
Original poster
Apr 19, 2006
4,195
71
Carolina Beach, NC

CBS-Turner reach deal to broadcast NCAA tournament


The NCAA unanimously passed a recommendation to the Division I Board of Directors to increase the NCAA tournament to 68 teams late Wednesday, and on Thursday reached a new agreement that will allow CBS and Turner, as partners, to broadcast the event starting next season.

The agreement is for 14 years and $10.8 billion.

“This is an important day for intercollegiate athletics and the 400,000 student-athletes who compete in NCAA sports,” said NCAA interim president Jim Isch. “This agreement will provide on average more than $740 million annually to our conferences and member schools to help student-athletes in 23 sports learn and compete.”

The new agreement calls for opening-round games, first-round games and second-round games to be shown nationally on CBS, TBS, TNT and truTV. CBS and Turner will split coverage of the regional semifinal games. CBS will handle coverage of the regional finals and the Final Four, including the national championship game, through 2015. Beginning in 2016, coverage of the regional finals will be split by CBS and Turner with the Final Four and the national championship game alternating every year between CBS and TBS.

NCAA senior vice president Greg Shaheen said it remains unclear how a 68-team bracket will look.

He added it should be determined by "mid-summer."

All games will still be available online.

Glad it's not 96 teams. That would've really watered down the greatest tourney played every year. Having 4 networks will be a lot different, especially for those without cable. Luckily, the last line says "All games will still be available online." Phewww!
 

tobefirst ⚽️

macrumors 601
Jan 24, 2005
4,612
2,335
St. Louis, MO
I am also glad they aren't going to 96 or 128 teams. I am certainly not the first to say it, but I echo those who are baffled that they want to tweak the tournament that is working perfectly, that everyone loves, and are so resistant to adjust how the football championship is decided, which doesn't work perfectly and which no one seems to like.
 

ucfgrad93

macrumors Core
Aug 17, 2007
19,532
10,820
Colorado
I am also glad they didn't increase the number of teams to 96 or even more. What is the point of the tournament if everyone is in it?
 

iOrlando

macrumors 68000
Jul 20, 2008
1,811
1
4 opening round games to decide seed 16 in each bracket.


pretty big win for Turner.
 

jzuena

macrumors 65816
Feb 21, 2007
1,125
149
It makes sense that all four brackets should have a play-in for the final seed.
 

GSMiller

macrumors 68000
Dec 2, 2006
1,666
0
Kentucky
Of course the one network I watch is over run during the winter with basketball games. I was glad last year to hear ESPN taking over the broadcast rights of the SEC from Raycom, but they still aired them on CBS through the SEC Network. At least CBS airs (most of) the games online, for free.
 

Gregg2

macrumors 604
May 22, 2008
7,189
1,179
Milwaukee, WI
The cool thing is that all the games will be live.

But I wonder if there will stlll be "bonus coverage" during halftimes, blowouts, etc.

I discovered some "parallel broadcasts" on my local CBS channel.3 (This TV) so I wasn't stuck with whatever game was on the main CBS feed. You get those .X channels through the digital converter box. I don't think that cable or satellite systems have them. My satellite company doesn't.
 

MacNut

macrumors Core
Jan 4, 2002
22,995
9,973
CT
I think it will depend on who owns producing rights. Will this still be a CBS sports production just split over 4 networks or is Turner sharing in the producing. The live look in would still be in play I would think.

Also what happens to the DirecTV feed. They simulcast all the games, but now with it being spread on 4 networks is there a need for DirecTV.

According to wiki, home market games will be on CBS and the other 3 networks will carry the swing games.
 

Tilpots

macrumors 601
Original poster
Apr 19, 2006
4,195
71
Carolina Beach, NC
I think it will depend on who owns producing rights. Will this still be a CBS sports production just split over 4 networks or is Turner sharing in the producing. The live look in would still be in play I would think.

Also what happens to the DirecTV feed. They simulcast all the games, but now with it being spread on 4 networks is there a need for DirecTV.

According to wiki, home market games will be on CBS and the other 3 networks will carry the swing games.

Interesting. At least for next year, I don't think much will change in production or on air talent. CBS is still the top dog for the next few years and already has the infrastructure in place. They'll probably use next year as a testing and exploratory phase.

Then the in the following years, the questions become:

Does the on air talent change?

Do the Director's change?

Will Turner and CBS provide multiple graphics or come up with a brand new universal look?

Will Jim Nance keep his position as THE Man?

It's all really interesting and I'm wondering how it will all shake out. I hope it's a good thing, but it's hard to mess with perfection. I think CBS has done a bang up job with the Tourney and would hate to see it get ruined in a broadcaster's pissing match.
 

H00513R

macrumors 6502a
Mar 12, 2010
687
68
Indiana
I was going to forsake the NCAA Tournament if they went to 96 teams. This is at least passable. But if they think this is going to "fix" things they'll be disappointed. All this is just a another addition to their money pot.
 

Tilpots

macrumors 601
Original poster
Apr 19, 2006
4,195
71
Carolina Beach, NC
does that mean we could see a potential 16 over 1 upset? one of them mid majors could get lucky

It'll happen one day, but probably not because of this arrangement. The good mid-majors usually get higher than 16 seeds. The 16th seed is usually a small conference champion that didn't finish first in the league.

I was going to forsake the NCAA Tournament if they went to 96 teams. This is at least passable. But if they think this is going to "fix" things they'll be disappointed. All this is just a another addition to their money pot.

What are you suggesting needs to be "fixed?" The tournament, aside from minor seeding issues, is about the most perfect tournament ever created, imho.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.