Obama Administration Vetoes Partial Ban on Apple Products

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by MacRumors, Aug 3, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    The Obama administration has vetoed a partial ban on the import and sale of some Apple products which was granted back in June in response to a ruling made by the USITC (United States International Trade Commission). The ban, which applied to AT&T models of the iPhone 4 and iPhone 3GS, and the 3G models of the iPad and the iPad 2, was granted after the USITC found that the aforementioned products infringed on a Samsung patent, specifically Patent No. 7,706,348, titled "Apparatus and method for encoding/decoding transport format combination indicator in CDMA mobile communication system."

    Today, in a letter to Irving A. Williamson, the Chairman of the USITC, the United States Trade Representative Michael B. G. Froman declared the following:
    The letter further went on to note that the Obama administration was "committed to promoting innovation and economic progress, including through providing adequate and effective protection and enforcement of intellectual property rights".

    The Verge has noted that this is the first time since 1987 that the President of the United States has interfered with a decision from the ITC. This comes after the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) recently criticised this sort of use of sales bans (rather than monetary compensation) as a means of executing patent infringement - as it in effect harms rival products and companies and does not promote a competitive trading environment. CNet had previously cited experts who believed it was unlikely for the administration to step in on this case.

    Just last week, Verizon attorney Randal Milch published an open letter calling for presidential intervention in this case to veto the ban. The ban would have otherwise gone into effect on August 5th, 2013.

    Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the comment thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All MacRumors forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

    Article Link: Obama Administration Vetoes Partial Ban on Apple Products
     
  2. Cubeeless, Aug 3, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 4, 2013

    macrumors regular

    Cubeeless

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2012
  3. macrumors G5

    Consultant

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    #3
    Finally, the President clarifies that FRAND patents can't be used recklessly in the United States.
     
  4. macrumors 604

    bushido

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2008
    Location:
    Germany
    #4
    well this should make it clear that the current patent system in the US is pathetic right? time to change it, apparently its important enough for obama if he bothers to veto the ban .. :rolleyes:

    #lobbyists
     
  5. macrumors regular

    Sardonick007

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    #5
    Prez needs to stay out of these types of things. There's already enough bureaucracy in place. He needs to run the country, not business.
     
  6. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2007
    #6
    Excellent news!
    Apple said it will pay the same amount of licensing that Samsung is charging everybody else. So, there is no justification for Samsung to ask for more money.

    FRAND licenses should be used as FRAND!
     
  7. macrumors 65816

    notabadname

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Location:
    Cincinnati
    #7
    Politics and pro or con Apple oportunities abound. Why do I think this thread may break the 500 post mark rather quickly? :rolleyes:
     
  8. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2010
    #8
  9. macrumors 68000

    Earendil

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2003
    Location:
    Washington
    #9
    While I understand what you mean, the economics of the United States IS business. Unless of course you want the United States to get involved in another war, or start making love.

    That said, this is exactly the sort of thing the President should be getting involved with. Sometimes you need a large group of people to temper a single ruler, and sometimes you need one man to cut through the bureaucratic crap and do what's right. That's both the Pro and the Con to our form of government.

    Besides, that's what the government does, invoke policy to protect/promote/keep safe the individual, companies, and allies of the united states, at least when their having a good day. This happens to fall into protecting both the individual consumer that hopes to purchase one of the United States top products, and protecting a US company from overzealous punishment. Allowing this to go forward would punish groups that weren't directly involved. They should fine Apple and call it a day.
     
  10. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    #10
    he just wants to see blackberry die already lol.
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    Reason077

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2007
    #11
    Mister Obama, please use your presidential powers to veto iOS 7 while there's still time!
     
  12. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2003
    Location:
    Costa Mesa
    #12
    Where ya at MegaManX with Obama won't veto this...lol.
     
  13. macrumors 65816

    taptic

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2012
    Location:
    California
    #13
    Wha....???
     
  14. Guest

    Sky Blue

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    #14
    Obama Administration Vetoes iOS 7 icons on Apple Products
     
  15. macrumors 6502

    bb426

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Location:
    California
    #15
    Who cares what Obama's done and what he hasn't done.

    It's the first time since '87 that a president has done something about the crappy system we have that stifles innovation.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2009
    #16
    It is incorrect to believe less government is better.

    We need more bureaucracy and regulation, not less.

    It is government that generates all wealth.

    Without big government, we would have Somalia.

    Right now we need far more government bureaucrats in the Patent office so that they can do a better job of researching patent applications.

    The ITC ruling is a good example of the failure in the "less government" ideology.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Eduardo1971

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2006
    Location:
    Lost Angeles, Ca. usa
    #17
    Very good decision by the president!

    This is a good example of government intervention that is necessary within the business community. Imagine the ramifications if the original ruling were to stand.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    j4zb4

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2011
    #18
    I feel it shouldn't have come so far in the first place...
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2010
  20. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2012
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    #20
    Good move by the US president. I applaud this decision.
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2008
    #21
    Samsung is Scum

    The administration finally did the right thing. Also, Samsung underhanded moves and slavish copying of Apple needs to stop!
     
  22. macrumors 68040

    Koodauw

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Location:
    Madison
  23. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2004
    #23
    What slam?
     
  24. macrumors 65816

    Swift

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2003
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #24
    The president didn't do a thing. The administration did it. According to the law.
     
  25. thekev, Aug 3, 2013
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 3, 2013

    macrumors 603

    thekev

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    #25
    He didn't technically clarify that. Read through it and include the footnotes.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page