October 23, 1999: Mac OS 9 Released

Discussion in 'MacBytes.com News Discussion' started by MacBytes, Oct 23, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2003
  2. macrumors 603

    Warbrain

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2004
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
  3. macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #3
    Do you really mean that?

    I must admit, I was pretty new to Macs back then, but seeing Mac OS 8.5 evolve into Mac OS 9 was not very impressive IMHO.
    Back then Mac OS X Server 1.0 (Rhapsody) was looking pretty cool, but Mac OS 9 was more of the same. Same bad memory management, no SMP support (apart from some plug-ins for apps like Photoshop) etc.
    Apple was in need of a completely new OS, and was getting it in the form of Mac OS X. No 10.0 yet... no Aqua yet... more importantly: no Carbon yet.

    But it came... oh boy.. did it come!!! :cool: :p
     
  4. macrumors G3

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2002
    #4
    It was still better than Windows though. ;)
     
  5. macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #5
    Ooh yes.
    That it be, that it be....

    Windows ME. Anyone remember that ghastly OS?
     
  6. macrumors 6502

    impierced

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2002
    #6
    Though Rhapsody was hardly a new OS. :)

    NextStep (68k) -> OpenStep (Intel) -> Rhapsody (PPC) ... Mac OS X
     
  7. macrumors Core

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2004
    #7
    I started with OS 7.5. I just remember it was pretty crap. 8.5 wasn't much better. 9 was nice. I didn't migrate to OS X until 10.2 and I hated it for about 4 months:eek:
     
  8. macrumors 604

    MacsRgr8

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2002
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    #8
    True. Rhapsody is not the real new part (except for a "platinum theme", making it look like Mac OS 9).....
    But Carbon did make it a bit new. It made it "accessible" for developers. Only with carbonisation was it possible for the developers to make some "enhancements" to their software to make it run natively on new Mac OS X 10.x.
    In the Rhapsody environment the developers had to re-write their apps from scratch to make it run natively.
    Carbon made Mac OS X big. It delivered (amongst others) Office v X and many of Adobe's apps. Without these giants, Mac OS X wouldn't have made it.
    So, Mac OS X 10.x is a bit new, and you're right: Rhapsody wasn't really :eek:
     
  9. macrumors 68020

    mainstreetmark

    Joined:
    May 7, 2003
    Location:
    Saint Augustine, FL
    #9
    I always felt that OS9 was just an appetizer for OSX. Apple didn't want an OS9, but they had to have SOMETHING out there. They chucked in a few useless features, and suddenly it was a "major revision".

    Nothing close to the massive update between system 6, and system 7, when OS# really came of age.

    (OS#? I guess I'm using that to mean "not OS X")
     

Share This Page