Parallels Desktop 10 with OS X Yosemite and iCloud Drive Support Launches for Existing Customers

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Aug 19, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Parallels today announced the launch of Parallels Desktop 10 for Mac, the latest version of the company's software for running alternate operating systems like Windows in virtual environments on the Mac. The new version is available today as an upgrade for existing customers, and it will launch on August 26 for new customers.

    Parallels Desktop 10 offers a bevy of new features and enhancements, including OS X Yosemite support, iCloud Drive and iPhoto Library support and battery life and performance speed optimizations. The main new features of Desktop 10 include:
    Upgrade pricing for users of Parallels Desktop 8 or 9 is $49.99, while standard retail pricing is set at $79.99 for regular users and $39.99 for students. Parallels Desktop 10 customers also receive a free three-month subscription to Parallels Access that allows Windows and Mac users to use their machines from their iPads.

    Article Link: Parallels Desktop 10 with OS X Yosemite and iCloud Drive Support Launches for Existing Customers
     
  2. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2011
    #2
    Wow, I literally just purchased Parallels Desktop 9 slightly over a month ago. This sucks. :(
     
  3. macrumors 68000

    RoastingPig

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2012
    Location:
    SoCal
    #3
    I wonder how good the gaming performance is? I remember gaming in parralels 7 was horrid
     
  4. macrumors 68000

    1080p

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2010
    Location:
    Planet Earth
    #4
    Yosemite was announced in June. Every time there is a new version of OSX, Parallells comes out with a new version of it's software.
     
  5. macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2007
    #5
    So, while Apple has started giving me free upgrades every year, Parallels is going down the path of forcing me into what amounts to an annual subscription. On three different machines. I don't need "new features" from my virtualization software. I just need you to support what I've already paid for.

    Jack wads.
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    PocketSand11

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Location:
    ~/
    #6
    Why, does Parallels Desktop 9 have bugs that they aren't fixing or things that need updating? I'm currently using VMWare Fusion 5 for Windows and VirtualBox for FreeBSD, by the way. Fusion 5 is one version behind but doesn't seem to have any issues other than maybe being slower than Parallels.
     
  7. macrumors regular

    JonneyGee

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2011
    Location:
    Nashville, TN
    #7
    $79.99 new/$49.99 upgrade for what is essentially a one-year rental, as another upgrade will be required next year. What a ripoff.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    PocketSand11

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Location:
    ~/
    #8
    Why are these updates required?
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    #9
    Annoying certainly, but if you think of Apple as a hardware company and Parallels as a software company...
     
  10. macrumors member

    RedWeasel

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2010
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #10
    Apple sells hardware. The software is a give-away you get with the hardware.

    So what? Just stay on Parallels 9 on Mavericks, where is the problem? This is what you've paid for and it's still working fine.
     
  11. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    #11
    If you want to upgrade to the latest version of OS X.
     
  12. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2011
    #12
  13. macrumors newbie

    abugbitme

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2010
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    #13
    Done with Parallels...

    I'm not paying for any more of their "upgrades". Had I known that it was going to cost me 100 to 200 bucks a year for their software on my machines I never would have bought it to start with.

    Back to Bootcamp for the very few things i need to do in Windows, or maybe I'll buy and older PC for next to nothing.
     
  14. macrumors member

    VeryVito

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2008
    #14
    Agreed. Parallels was a great utility when it appeared years ago, but now it feels more like a long con.

    After Parallels 9 was rendered useless to me for months following an OS X update, I swore off the annual donation to its cause and switched back to VMWare Fusion. No regrets so far. (A show-stopping bug that went acknowledged but unfixed resulted in guest OS X hosts' refusing to show anything other than a blank screen for months).

    I tried to keep loving it (I've been a used since its introduction), but I can test IE (what else would you use it for?) on VirtualBox, CrossOver, VMWare and other solutions with a lot less headache these days.
     
  15. macrumors G4

    Small White Car

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2006
    Location:
    Washington DC
    #15
    Every time we talk about Adobe Creative Cloud and Microsoft Office 360 there's a great wailing cry from the masses: We don't want subscriptions! Let us buy what we want, when we want it!

    Yeah. What a bunch of BS that is.

    'Cause here's that and guess what? Still a bitch-fest.
     
  16. macrumors 6502a

    CrazyForApple

    Joined:
    Dec 31, 2012
    Location:
    Buffalo, NY
  17. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2013
    #17
    And yet, VMware Fusion manages to keep right on running with each new version of OS X. That software is not 'required' to be upgraded.
     
  18. macrumors 6502a

    PocketSand11

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Location:
    ~/
    #18
    As far as I know, the old ones are compatible with the newer versions of OS X. At least that's how it was with Mavericks. The system requirements for Desktop 9 state "OS X 10.9 Mavericks or later, OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion or later, OS X Lion 10.7.4 or later, or Mac OS X Snow Leopard v10.6.8 or later."
     
  19. macrumors 601

    brand

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2006
    Location:
    127.0.0.1
    #19
    The way Parallels and Fusion keep leap froging each other I would fully expect Fusion the be announce very quickly as in days or weeks.

    Can you not use VirtualBox for the limited needs it would appear that you have? Not as polished as Parallels or Fusion but for free it is hard to beat.
     
  20. macrumors G4

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    #20
    Me too.

    What about OpenCL support ?
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    shareef777

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    #21
    Software companies release something called patches and bug fixes, not upgrade requirements to keep their software working.

    ----------

    WTF you talking about. Parallels is also selling a subscription and purposely ignoring to advertise it as such. Someone that purchased the software just a MONTH ago is SOL if they upgrade to Yosemite.

    ----------

    They're not, it'll be 6 months+ before they update ver9 to work on Yosemite. People don't buy their software to use half the year.
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    #22
    last year they released an update for parallels 8 to support mavericks. (just didn't announce it very loudly)

    i'm sure they'll do the same for 9 this year.
     
  23. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2010
    #23
    Interesting that their default configurations have changed a bit. For instance, all VMs now seem to be assigned at least 2 CPUs by default, whereas they previously recommended only assigning one unless you were using a specific highly multithreaded application.

    In addition, if you use the gaming, testing, or CAD/design configuration, it defaults to assigning ALL your RAM and CPUs to the VM. I assume they're more confident in their ability to automatically balance resources between the host and guest systems if they're setting a default like this…
     
  24. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2013
  25. Quu
    macrumors 68000

    Quu

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2007
    #25
    These product launch videos with this cutesy music are seriously tired.
     

Share This Page