PBG4's need more than a processor bump

Discussion in 'General Mac Discussion' started by imspace2, Jan 26, 2002.

  1. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2001
    Messages:
    68
    Location:
    Aurora, CO
    #1
    Don't flame me for this guys but is'nt it a little crappy that the new iMac greatly outperforms the TiBook, anyway and whats with the dog-**** video card in that thing (PBG4)when will we see 32 or 64 with a good vid processor whats with ATI?
     
  2. macrumors 601

    AlphaTech

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2001
    Messages:
    4,556
    Location:
    Natick, MA
    #2
    Re: PBG4's need more than a processor bump

    Have you used one of the new TiBooks??? I have a 500MHz rev A model (using it right now) and it is great. The only time that it has ANY video problems is with Quake 3. Unreal Tournament runs very smooth , which I like better anyway.

    I would like to have the mobile Radeon in my TiBook, but that is not a large enough issue. When I am ready to replace this TiBook in two years, who knows what will be in the new ones.
     
  3. macrumors 68030

    irmongoose

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2001
    Messages:
    2,877
    Location:
    Sometimes Tokyo, sometimes California
    #3
    ATI Radeon is better than geforce2 right?



    irmongoose
     
  4. macrumors 68040

    MacAztec

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Messages:
    3,022
    Location:
    San Luis Obispo, CA
    #4
    Yes mognose. An ATI Radeon 8500 is about a G4Force 3
     
  5. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Messages:
    48
    #5
    so besides speed, which is better imac g4 or powerbook g4? I got the 667 model about 3 months ago or a month before the combo drive, i have a bad memory on dates and stuff but i was pissed about the combo drive i wanted it on the pbg4 before it came out since ibook had it, but with other stuff, which is better? and when do you think that ibook will take over the curent powerbooks
     
  6. macrumors 6502a

    chmorley

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2002
    Messages:
    602
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    #6
    Which is better?

    I don't know what would make anyone think the 500 and 600 MHz G3's in the iBook would be faster than the 550 and 667 MHz G4's--especially running OS X. It's just not so. The TiBook is a G4. The iBook is a G3. The bus on the TiBook is significantly faster. The screen on the TiBook is larger. I don't think there's any question which is better. The iBook might be a better value, though. It's a great entry-level portable.

    I also bought the 667 about 3 months ago and was p*ssed when I found out the combo drives were released--it was also what I wanted. I figure it's worth the $300 to upgrade, though.

    If you're interested, check out the FAQ.

    http://www.info.apple.com/usen/powerbook/upgrade_faq.html

    CJM
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2002
    Messages:
    48
    #7
    sweet, my burner broke a long time ago, looks like ill have to wait longer for the digital cma than i though, oh well
     

Share This Page