PentiumIV vrs CoreDuo2

Discussion in 'Mac Basics and Help' started by hdsalinas, Sep 8, 2006.

  1. hdsalinas macrumors 6502

    hdsalinas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Location:
    San Pedro Sula, Honduras
    #1
    Hi,

    My current PC is a PentiumIV 2.4GHz Northwood. I am getting a 20" iMac (or maybe a 24") for christmas, so how does my current chip compare to the new Core2duo 2.16Ghz in the imac.

    Somehow going from 2.4 to 2.16 does not look like an upgrade although I know is newer technology. So is the Pentium 4 family dead? is it that there is not going to be a Pentium V or are the current core duos it?
     
  2. dukebound85 macrumors P6

    dukebound85

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2005
    Location:
    5045 feet above sea level
    #2

    well lets say it quite a bit faster
    i dont know the benchmarks but remember this is dual core = dual cpu at 2.16ghx. However it isnt as simple as saying a dualcore cpu is 2* 2.16 in this case

    yea the new thing is now multicore rather than single core and just upping the ghz
     
  3. balamw Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    #3
    My 1.8 GHz Core Duo iMac is significantly faster than my 2.8 GHz P4. Partly because of HyperThreading which essentially presents the 2.8 as two 1.4 Ghz virtual processors.

    Yes, P4 is dead dead deadski. The P4 was a mistake, Intel soon realized that it only became efficient at very high clock speeds and that when you got there it used a lot of power, so they went back to the Pentium III core to develop their Pentium M processors for laptops from which the Core processors are derived.

    EDIT: Check out Anandtech or THG to see how much faster the Core processors are compared to pretty much everything that has come before:
    e.g. http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2795
    B
     
  4. scott523 macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2006
    Location:
    St Charles, MO
    #4
    I got a 3.2GHz P4 w/ HT desktop and it's still in good condition for a couple more years but in terms of new computers coming out, P4 is history now that Core 2 Duo is dual-core.
     
  5. carlos700 macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2004
    Location:
    Omaha NE
    #5
    The Core 2 microarchitecture is far more advanced than Netburst architecture. I would take a 2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo over any Pentium 4 anyday.
     
  6. Mac Rules macrumors 6502

    Mac Rules

    Joined:
    Jul 15, 2006
    Location:
    Switzerland
    #6
    I've got a Pentium 4 3.2GHz HT PC, and I thought it wasn't too sluggish, but when I played with the new Core 2 system that my mate had put together, I was just blown away with performance.

    Cheers
     
  7. balamw Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    #7
    It's clear why. Do the math. 3.2 GHz w/HT = 2x ~1.6GHz. Core 2 Duo at 2.0 GHz would be at least 20% faster, but is in fact more than that.

    B
     
  8. Rocksaurus macrumors 6502a

    Rocksaurus

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2003
    Location:
    California
    #8
    Okay, let's just clear this up right now. HT has nothing to do with it. There are plenty of Intel Pentium 4's without HT that are over 2.4 GHz. Processors have something called a "pipeline" that data goes through. The Pentium 4 Northwood has a pipeline that puts the data through 21 stages before it is finally processed. The Pentium 4 Prescott has a pipeline that is 31 stages. A shorter pipeline gets things done faster. The Core 2 Duo has a 14 stage pipeline. It's more efficient. Factor in that it's dual core, uses shared L2 cache between the cores etc. etc. and you've got a processor that while clocked at *only* 2.16 GHz is significantly faster than your 2.4 Northwood.
     
  9. Shadow macrumors 68000

    Shadow

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2006
    Location:
    Keele, United Kingdom
    #9
    I have run tests on my PC and MacBook. The MacBook is significantly faster. (Specs are below). The P4 got just over 1Gflop (about 1.3/1.4) and the Core Duo got around 2. Can't remember he rest of the results, but the Core Duo was way faster.
     
  10. generik macrumors 601

    generik

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Location:
    Minitrue
    #10
    Pentium IVs are completely dead. Even a Conroe at 1.86Ghz (slowest Conroe) beats out the fastest P4 EE chip there ever was, take what you will from that :rolleyes:
     
  11. balamw Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    #11
    I was trying to keep it simple. What you say is true, but HT does have something to do with it since it is enabled on 90% of the P4 systems I've ever run accross and thus doesn't help matters at all. The return to a shorter PIII like pipeline is one of the key features of the Pentium M and its decendants, most recently Core 2 Duo...

    One thing I didn't mention is that if you follow the links I gave, the Core Duos smoke even the power hungry dual core Pentium D systems clocked at > 3 GHz. :p

    B
     
  12. hdsalinas thread starter macrumors 6502

    hdsalinas

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2006
    Location:
    San Pedro Sula, Honduras
    #12
    Well, Someone once told me to consider these core duo chips as twice as fast -For example the 2.0Ghz is equal to 4.0Ghz since "it had two cores". I would not go as far.

    Thanks for all of your informative replays. I went over to intel's website and they have a neat feature where you can compare different chips.

    So this means that intel has discontinued its processor naming scheme? Are we somewhere between P4s and P5s?

    I guess this proves that the Ghz war really not that important.
     
  13. balamw Moderator

    balamw

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2005
    Location:
    New England
    #13
    Yes. The Pentium name is dead, a victim of the poor choices of the PIV era. Recall that the Pentium was an alternative to the 80586 name.

    They don't want to have to explain that their new chips have a bit more in common with Pentium IIIs than a PIV.

    Like AMD they're also trying to move away from GHz as the main speed indicator, hence the T2600 E6600 etc. monikers.

    B
     
  14. dmw007 macrumors G4

    dmw007

    Joined:
    May 26, 2005
    Location:
    Working for MI-6
    #14
    Any Core Duo or Core 2 Duo based system is going to be much faster than your Pentium 4 based computer hdsalinas. :)
     

Share This Page