Petition?

Discussion in 'iPod' started by maxjg, Sep 6, 2007.

  1. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #1
    Hi guys.
    I haven't been an Apple guy for too long(2yrs, appx), so my knowledge is limited on this one. Has Apple ever really responded to petitions? If so, I think we really need to make one for a HDD-based iPod Touch. Yes, I realize this may be a marketing scheme by Apple, but still, our voices need to be heard!

    Max
     
  2. Moderator emeritus

    sushi

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Location:
    キャンプスワ&#
    #2
    Suggest you write a nice polite letter to Apple requesting this.

    And you can give feedback on the Apple web site.
     
  3. macrumors 65816

    OrangeCuse44

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    #3
    you have to understand that Apple is a huge corporation. they have hundreds of employees working in their R&D department alone. On top of marketing specialists. What they rolled out yesterday was for a reason. A reason that will do the best for the COMPANY, not its customers. That's how big corporations work. Yes, Apple seems to care more about what its customers want, but everything they COULD have done was debated and tossed around for 2 years. And they are already working on what's coming in 2 more years. This is what we get, no matter how many people want an HDD based Touch.
     
  4. macrumors Penryn

    rdowns

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2003
    #4
    Get with the program Max. It will come. Apple just needs to sell a shiteload of flash based ones and then re-sell higher capacity ones to them in a year or so. SUck it up, buy the flash version and start saving again. :p
     
  5. macrumors Core

    Jaffa Cake

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    The City of Culture, Englandshire
    #5
    Unfortunately, online petitions generally aren't worth the paper they're written on. ;)
     
  6. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #6
    See original post:
     
  7. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    #7
    I can understand why you guys want more capacity for the touch. But you need to realize there is no marketing for this at all, it is truly based on what is possible. Hard Drives take an incredible amount of battery to work. The current Classic at 80 GB has batter of 30 hours for Audio and 5 for Video. Now look at the the Touch, it has 22 hours for Audio and 5 for Video. The touch probably uses a smaller or the same battery as the Classic 80 Gb. For what you want to be possible the iPod will be the size of the classic + all the stuff that makes the touch screen possible + a huge battery. This would be at least the size of a 4th Generation iPod, and that might only be for battery of 15 for Audio, and 1 for Video. To get good performance the thing would have to be huge, maybe even 3rd Generation iPod size to make it worth it. It's not going to happen.
     
  8. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2007
    #8
    the touch is fine. doesnt need more space.
     
  9. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #9
    I dunno, as I'm not a battery expert, but I'd guess that Apple put a smaller battery in the iPod touch then they did the classic because of size. I would imagine that if they put the classic's battery in the touch, it'd get probably at least 20 hours of battery life with music. I(and many other people I have talked to), would much rather have a slightly thicker iPod touch with an HDD then a nerfed 8mm.
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    OrangeCuse44

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2006
    Location:
    Long Island, NY
    #10
    Everytime you think something else could have been done, please re-read this. And yes, I did just quote myself.
     
  11. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #11
    Petitions only (if ever) work concerning governments.

    Apple knows what it wants to sell and putting a disk drive into another iPod is unlikely to happen. If it weren't for the expense of huge capacities, the full-sized iPod would have flash memory. In two years, there might not be a 1.8 inch disk drive in use at Apple.
     
  12. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Location:
    LaSalle, ON
    #12
    I wouldn't be surprised if in two years there wasn't a 2.5" drive in use in Apple laptops!
     
  13. thread starter macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2006
    #13
    Yeah, but if Apple, as a corporation, finds that they may make a whole lot more money from a HDD based touch then a flash based one, it's not unreasonable to think that they might release one.
     
  14. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2002
    Location:
    Gone but not forgotten.
    #14
    Yes. There are already flash memory kits with PATA and SATA interfaces to fit into those slots. Of course, paying $600 for something that normally would cost you $125 is a bit much but they're available.
     
  15. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2006
    Location:
    LaSalle, ON
    #15
    $600 now, $300 next year, and $125 in 2 years time.. :)
     

Share This Page