Polls are moving back in Bush's direction

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by Thomas Veil, Oct 17, 2004.

  1. Thomas Veil macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    Reality
    #1
    I give up. I just don't know what to say anymore.

    With just two weeks left to go, and in spite of Kerry winning all three debates, the latest CNN/Gallup poll shows Bush widening the lead, 52% to 44%, over Kerry among likely voters.

    This follows a Newsweek poll a day or two earlier which reached a similar conclusion.

    I don't get it. Does Bush have to physically come to your house, rob you blind and shoot your children not to get elected?

    If this doesn't change quickly, you might want to think about following through on that threat to move to Canada.
     
  2. meta-ghost macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #2
    relax. the truth is nothing of the sort. cnn/gallup are shills for the gop. if you look at the internals of the poll, it's legitimacy falls apart pretty quickly.

    this is who they say will be voting on election day.

    Republicans = 296 (38%)
    Independents = 211 (27%)
    Democrats = 278 (35%)

    now tell me that we are going to see 3% more registered republicans voting. no way.

    1) goopers have never in history had such an advantage in registered numbers.
    2) democrats have registered millions.

    it's crap pure and simple. big media doesn't want a change in the fcc and they're doing all they can to work with the rethug team. it's about creating an aura of invincibility.

    in 2000, the gallup model over-sample rethugs by 3% and under-sample dems by 4%. a 7% mistake.

    this election won't be anywhere near as close as most are saying. especially electorally
     
  3. LethalWolfe macrumors G3

    LethalWolfe

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2002
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #3
    Just because people think candidate X presented himself better during a debate doesn't neccisarily<sp?> mean people think candidate X will do a better job in the White House.

    The "who won the debate" poll is, IMO, pointless and only good for PR for the winning side.


    Lethal
     
  4. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #4
    I guess that's why they seem to have ignored candidate Z, he would have make them both look like jokes.

    Ralphie has done more for the average citizen than both candidate X & Y together.

    Of course that doesn't make him a leader, but just somebody that's done a lot.

    ---

    Would have been interesting to see him on stage though, nobody could be worse that Ross Perot on stage, besides Bush. ;)
     
  5. LeeTom macrumors 68000

    LeeTom

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    #5
    Yeah, these polls are pointless. Kerry will win with 9% of the electoral vote, and all the news agencies will call it a big surprise, yada-yada.
    We know who will win.

    Lee Tom
     
  6. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #6
    at this late date, i think these "swings" we're seeing are more variances due to who's polled and what questions are asked than true opinion movement.

    fwiw, this zogby poll has the margin at 2.

     
  7. meta-ghost macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #7
    4 years of incompetence AND looking like an idiot who doesn't know the issues can usually be overcome when:
    1) you own the media
    2) you own congress
    3) you own scotus

    but not this year.
     
  8. meta-ghost macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #8
    zogby is one of the better pollsters. check this approach out:

    The very creative John Zogby, in a print-only article in this week's New Yorker reveals why he was so sure the 2000 election would be incredibly close --- by polling America's true reality, the imaginary land of Oz. And... *this same polling technique currently forecasts a 10% Kerry landslide for 2004! Here is what Zogby told Larissa MacFarquhar, the author of the article:

    "I asked one question the Saturday before the election in 2000. I called my call center in Utica and said, 'Put this in the poll:"You live in the land of Oz, and the candidates are the Tin Man, who's all brains and no heart, and the Scarecrow, who's all heart and no brains. Who would you vote for?"' The next day, I called Utica and said, 'Whaddaya got?' They said, 'Well we've got Gore---, 'I said, 'I don't care about Gore. What's Oz? 'It was 46.2 for the Tin Man and 46.2 for the Scarecrow. It was right there that I knew I wasn't going to know what was going to happen. But I asked this question again two weeks ago and the Tin Man led by 10 points.

    Apparently Zogby has been polling Oz on this race ever since, and as recently as April of 2004 the Tin Man and the Scarecrow were running dead even. But now it's a blow-out! (actually Zogby's poll is two weeks old, which suggests that in Oz the debates took place during September...).
     
  9. LeeTom macrumors 68000

    LeeTom

    Joined:
    May 31, 2004
    #9
    That's fascinating about the Zogby Oz thing... and, I might point out, is in line with my prediction! :)

    Lee Tom
     
  10. Thomas Veil thread starter macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    Reality
    #10
    Well, I feel a little better about things.

    But it also seems to me at, as election day nears, the few remaining undecided voters usually seem to gravitate towards the status quo rather than the challenger. I hope I'm wrong.
     
  11. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #11
    According to what I've been reading, an incumbent president's most important poll number is being at 50% or better; anything less is an advantage for a challenger. This supposedly is a more accurate predictor of victory than who is ahead at any given point. Since the advent of modern polling, very few incumbents have won when they polled under 50% -- which is where George W. is at today. Also, according to the pollsters, very few incumbents have done better in the election than their poll numbers predicted. George Bush the Elder is one of the few, but by less than one percent. All of the others have underperformed their poll numbers.
     
  12. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #12
    After seeing the front page of USA Today where it said dubya was ahead by 8 points, some of the facts made in this thread help re-assure the crook only has 15 more days left :)
     
  13. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #13
    well, there is the lame duck period.

    any guesses on what bush'll do during that time, should kerry win? i.e. would bush do something rash to intentionally **** the kerry presidency?
     
  14. meta-ghost macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #14
    there isn't much he can do now, his hands are tied. he can't invade iran/syria because the old guard conservative power structure realizes iraq has been a disaster in every respect. nor would he have support from an international community in any way.

    domestically, thank the lord we have the filibuster.
     
  15. Roger1 macrumors 65816

    Roger1

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2002
    Location:
    Michigan
  16. yg17 macrumors G5

    yg17

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2004
    Location:
    St. Louis, MO
    #16
    d'oh! forgot about that

    thats what worries me the most...all this time he's had to be careful with his decisions because he's up for re-election. But during the lame duck period or if god forbid shrub gets re-elected, he can do just about whatever the hell he wants becuase he doesnt have to worry about re-election
     
  17. wwworry macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2002
    #17
    I was out canvasing the other day and I noticed that a lot of people who were "infrequent voters" were going to be sure to vote in this election. It's something that most of my lazy friends and I were all out canvasing and most of us poor slobs had given money to the dems for this election whereas before we had never even considered it. I know there are a lot of people out there who are not considered "likely" voters who will be voting this time around.

    I don't know if it will make a difference but at least we tried. The polls don't matter. We matter.
     
  18. Thomas Veil thread starter macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    Reality
    #18
    Dammit, you beat me to it! :p
     
  19. Blue Velvet Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #19
    Perhaps this may make some Republican voters complacent and not bother voting... after all, if it's in the bag...
     
  20. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #20
    Forget those polls, i have not had anyone call me or ask me how iam going to vote and if i recall i saw hundreds of thousands of people demonstrating against Bush and that was everywhere. Bush has pissed off many folks for a plethera of reasons...............i expect a large turnout and a large turnout doesnt bode well for Bush. Whats the weather forcast 2 weeks from now? ;)
     
  21. meta-ghost macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Location:
    San Francisco
    #21
    democrats will swim thru shark infested waters to vote this year.
     
  22. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #22
    I would have to agree with you meta-ghost. i almost would and i aint even a democrat. :D
     
  23. Sun Baked macrumors G5

    Sun Baked

    Joined:
    May 19, 2002
    #23
    Isn't that a reality TV show?
     
  24. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #24
    Weather junky to the rescue. My patented Approx-u-Weather forecast for November 2 for major cities across the country:

    Boston: partly cloudy, breezy, 35/40
    Cleveland: overcast, 35/45, chance of rain
    Chicago: overcast, breezy, 42/45, chance of rain
    Dallas: partly cloudy, 60/65
    Denver: overcast, 20/30, light snow
    Des Moines: cloudy, 45/48, rain
    Detroit: partly cloudy, 35/40
    Los Angeles: clear, 40/55
    New York City: overcast, 35/40
    Miami: partly cloudy, breezy, 75/78
    Phoenix: clear, 45/60
    Pittsburgh: overcast, 30/45, chance of light rain
    Seattle: overcast, 38/45, rain
    St. Louis: overcast, 45/52, chance of light rain
    Washington DC: partly cloudy, 32/38​

    No sharks in the models yet, but I'll keep an eye out.
     
  25. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #25
    Could be a Republican day with all those clouds.....I find it interesting that Putin Dictator ..i mean President of russia is backing Bush. I wonder how many Americans will vote Bush because a Russian dictator darn it i did it again i mean president of russia tells us to.
     

Share This Page