i certainly dont think it is naive to think that ibm or apple would (together or separtely) acquire moto's semiconductor department. moto is hurting their stock is dropping, andthey have numerous times discussed openly the posibility of selling or simply abandoning their semiconductor department. if things over at moto get bad enough apple will have to do something, in fact i believe it is somewhat naive to think apple would just sit by idlely while the maker of their (nearly) only chip used in their computers goes under.
as far as discussion on the naming scheme of the processors, some of you need a serious logic injection. you seem to be just making stuff up. you guys are seeing patterns in the naming that doesnt exist and seem to be looking right past the very simple 74xx=g4 85xx=g5 scheme.
but talk of the next generation pro chip coming from ibm is far more interesting. for one, we would finally have a competant partner for apple pro models. also it would be very likley that apple would get rid of the Gx naming scheme finally.
as far as discussion on the naming scheme of the processors, some of you need a serious logic injection. you seem to be just making stuff up. you guys are seeing patterns in the naming that doesnt exist and seem to be looking right past the very simple 74xx=g4 85xx=g5 scheme.
but talk of the next generation pro chip coming from ibm is far more interesting. for one, we would finally have a competant partner for apple pro models. also it would be very likley that apple would get rid of the Gx naming scheme finally.