Professionals Successfully Push Mac Pro to Absurd Limits With 558-Day Video Timeline in Final Cut Pro

Discussion in 'Mac Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 21, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]
    After waiting for several years for Apple to release a new professional tower, the company finally released the new Mac Pro last year. With dual-GPUs and an innovative cooling system, the diminutive machine has impressed professional users.

    FCP.co decided to test out Final Cut Pro X and their well-equipped 8-core Mac Pro to absurd limits. The site put 1600 connected clips into the GUI, and actually got the Mac Pro to play 50 'layers' of 4K video for a few seconds before it began dropping frames. It also made a 500,000 pixel wide project, useful perhaps for making (extremely wide) digital signage projects. Finally, the site successfully made a 558-day video time line -- roughly a year and a half.
    FCP.co notes that most of the limitations occur with the hardware, not artificial limitations with Final Cut Pro X itself.

    Article Link: Professionals Successfully Push Mac Pro to Absurd Limits With 558-Day Video Timeline in Final Cut Pro
     
  2. macrumors 603

    Michaelgtrusa

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Location:
    Everywhere And Nowhere
  3. macrumors 6502a

    chirpie

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    #3
    I hereby ban all instances of the phrase "iMovie Pro" or "iMovie on Steroids."
     
  4. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2013
    Location:
    0 Infinite Loop
    #4
    I'm really excited to see the nMP over the next year or two with Broadwell to see how much the power/performace balance plays out before I dive in, was thinking of a hackintosh til then as I don't even have a 4k camera yet. The newer pcie-3 based flash coming out this year and faster ram by next year should push this even more into new territory.

    ----------

    I heard the same thing from a good friend who is still using FCP 7 since he's heavily invested but after I took the plunge when 10.1 was released, showing him the benefits, his ears are perking up.
     
  5. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    #5
    Not bad!

    That's pretty good! All that power for the low price of at $7,000!
     
  6. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    #6
    The MacPro does't drive stock price iToys drive stock price and Google has taken the innovation mind-share in that domain.
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    #7
    What do stock prices have to do with it? Apple makes their billions by selling devices and computers, not by trading stock. Google makes their billions by selling ads. And it turns out Apple makes more billions than Google. So if you want money to be the deciding factor in who is more “innovative” then Apple wins anyways.

    But seriously, money is the worst metric for determining innovation. They’re not related at all.
     
  8. macrumors 65816

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #8
    If paying $7000 for this kind of power is an issue for you then you definitely don't need that much power.
     
  9. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #9
    Using industry current parts from other companies (intel) to build a relatively fast computer is innovation? Its not like Apple invented super fast parts that no one else has.
    I guess its 'innovation' that they were able to cram those parts in a small cylander. But a year from now are you still gonna be oohhing and aahing over that black cylander?
    Probably not. You wont even think or care about how it looks.
     
  10. macrumors 65816

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #10
    Did you think that Apple was going to build a machine with technology that didn't previously exist? Did you expect that it would have something other than an Intel CPU, or that it would have proprietary video cards?

    What you described is exactly what innovation is for a company like Apple; to take existing technologies and integrate them in a creative way.

    I don't know what your criteria are for being able to say that Apple innovated with the MP. Maybe you could enlighten us and tell us what would constitute an innovative MP for you.
     
  11. macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    #11
    Money is the best metric of innovation as true innovation generates money.
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2003
    Location:
    Atlanta
    #12
    Its a relatively fast, but not the fastest computer available right now. What do YOU mean by innovation then. What exactly is so amazing about this machine?
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    Parasprite

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    #13
    I have a feeling that you don't know what that word means.
     
  14. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2010
    #14
    you couldn't be more wrong. Bugatti is perfect example. They have built the Veyron just to proof the engineering excellence. Not to make money! In fact, that project lost money but the result is pure delight. If you think that metric for innovation is money then I don't think we will continue this discussion in a constructive manner as you are blatantly ignorant to what innovation is.
    Btw, the inventor of a wheel didn't make money, yet the innovation is still used!
    For crying out loud, does everything has to be about money for you to even move a finger?
     
  15. macrumors 65816

    Nunyabinez

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Location:
    Provo, UT
    #15
    I already stated what I thought was innovation. In the case of the new MP it's a third of the size of the previous MP with incredible power. It utilizes a novel approach to cooling with the single solid heat sink and one fan. It introduces a new philosophy in workstations; make a very powerful base machine that has the ability to be expanded externally via Thunderbolt 2.

    To me that is quite innovative. The fact that there are machines that are faster by no means indicates that they are more innovative. In fact that's what most people around here complain about with things like the MBP. That Apple is simply upgrading to a faster processor and that is not "innovation."
     
  16. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2013
    Location:
    Uphill from Downtown
    #16
    Other way around bud. Its you who is confused. Look up a dictionary and come back. Or not. Doesn't really matter.
     
  17. macrumors 68000

    Parasprite

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    #17
    Considering the hardware responsible for these numbers are designed and produced by companies that aren't Apple, I would think not.

    That is unless you are talking about Final Cut Pro and not the hardware, in which case never mind.
     
  18. Blu Reel, Mar 21, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2014

    macrumors member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2011
    Location:
    Southern California
    #18
    Ok I can't resist...

    Taking the hardware tangent to the extreme, comparing how Apple is creating a new computer using "existing" technology to how HP, Dell, and the rest of PC industry are using "existing" technology to create a new computer, I would have to award Apple with the title of being innovative since the rest of the PC industry appears to be shrinking as opposed to growing, losing money (downsizing) as opposed to making money, rehashing the same old system and the same old way of doing things as opposed to...what's the word...innovating?

    Ok I admit, this is a total troll post, but like I said in my title, I just couldn't resist :)

    I've left gaping holes in my argument and logic...anyone?
     
  19. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    #19
    I don't need that much power. I build machines more powerful for less though. Not as fancy of a case, but you get the idea.
     
  20. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    #20
    You should list what hardware you are talking about. Some very tech blog (ars technica I believe...?) said that for the price, you can't do better, performance wise, (not even talking about the design). That ain't my expertise, but I bet you can't build a Mac Pro clone for much less, if any less.
     
  21. macrumors 6502a

    melendezest

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    #21
    OK, people saying the Mac Pro is not innovative need to shut up. It is. Period. It is unique in the market, nothing else is or has been, like it.

    Whether or not you like the Mac Pro, or feel that Apple should have gone in a different direction, is another story.

    This thing is powerful as hell, and while I'd rather had an updated "old" Mac Pro (both design and price-wise), I can see that Apple's target market would be happy. I am not in it, so it sucks to be me (kinda). :p
     
  22. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    #22
    E5-1650 - $550
    2 Firepro D500 - $490 a piece ($980)
    12 GB DDR3 1866 ECC - $180
    Motherboard - $160
    PSU - $90
    256 GB SSD - $140

    = $2,100~

    Apple Mac Pro cost - $2,999

    I don't even pay the prices mentioned above, anyone with Google does. I pay even less, probably $1,900. So $1,000 off. I didn't include a case or any 'innovation' though. :D

    ----------

    "It is. Period.."

    That's not how you make a point. If fitting already existing components into a smaller case is innovative to you then Apple has a fan for life and doesn't have to do much.

    The retina displays are innovative. Touch ID as well. Motion co-processor. They are plenty innovative, but shrinking a tower is not new. They shrunk the iMac a while back if you heard. They shrink things all the time.
     
  23. macrumors 68040

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    #23
    This is the problematic part. A PCIe SSD costs a lot more than a regular one. So your computer would be around 2300$.

    And 2 Firepro D500 - $490 a piece ($980) is also wrong. First of all, there's no D500 for sale. It's closest cousin is W7000 which costs 800 each, so if you go with that, you get 600$ more, and there, you reached the price of Mac Pro.

    ----------

    And they are all innovation.
     
  24. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2014
    #24
    If thats the case then every company can claim innovation.
     
  25. linuxcooldude, Mar 21, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2014

    macrumors 68000

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2010
    #25
    Cough..cough..Thunderbolt 2...Cough. A workstation using a single cooling fan about as quiet as a Mac Mini at 1/4 the size of conventual workstations. I'm sure Thunderbolt 2 will come out eventually for PC's.
     

Share This Page