Protest against bousozoku's closing of iBook thread.

Discussion in 'Site and Forum Feedback' started by SpaceMagic, Jul 11, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SpaceMagic macrumors 68000

    SpaceMagic

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Location:
    Cardiff, Wales
    #1
    Just because you are a moderator, doesn't mean I can't disagree with you... so here goes:

    Definition of a forum: A place, meeting, or medium where ideas and views on a particular issue can be exchanged.

    On the contrary, sir, without "conversations" then how can one "discuss" ideas and views on a particular issue. Now, the iBook next tuesday thread was hardly what I call spam. Even directly before you closed the thread there was legitimate debate over what specs the iBooks could be, what options people thought Apple would take and other relevant material. The way I saw it, that thread was pretty complete and had a lot of people talking about the next iBook revision.

    However, as that most useful thread has now been closed, the MacRumors forums will be inundated with relative newbies asking the same questions which have disappeared along with the iBooks next tuesday thread. Not only this, but the thread holds value for the members who posted on it, as it has been active for more than 2 months, which to me means pretty healthy discussion.

    So bousozoku, if you wish to keep the thread closed then it is up to you. But the powers which be above you, namely Arn, be warned... with such control and censorship, which *some* of the moderators exercise, one can only expect users to turn away from MR and its community.
     
  2. Savage Henry macrumors 65816

    Savage Henry

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2004
    Location:
    in a one horse, two house, three pub town.
    #2
    Newbies can use the Search facility provided by the forum in the top bar.
     
  3. SpaceMagic thread starter macrumors 68000

    SpaceMagic

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Location:
    Cardiff, Wales
    #3
    And how many regulars do you know who do this enough... let alone newbies?

    Plus that's not the point, the point being made is that moderators can relatively easily shut down threads. They're just ordinary people like you and me and ok, yes, they've been entrusted with mod powers so they're relatively safe, but still not infallible.
     
  4. mad jew Moderator emeritus

    mad jew

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2004
    Location:
    Adelaide, Australia
    #4
    Not sure you'll have all that much luck going public with this. Maybe just PMing the Mods would be a better route.
     
  5. Josh macrumors 68000

    Josh

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Location:
    State College, PA
    #5
    Forums aren't places for conversation?

    By what other name would you prefer to call an exchange of words?

    Aside from that, if the forums are to be seen as ultra-informative, non-conversational exchanges of useful Mac-related info, where do things like this come in to play: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?p=1575784#post1575784 ?

    Seems like "conversation" to me. Not trying to be picky..but seems a bit odd for one to close a thread deemed as "conversation" while openly taking part in an even more conversational one.

    $0.02
     
  6. grapes911 Moderator emeritus

    grapes911

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Location:
    Citizens Bank Park
    #6
    I know some people with over 500 posts who don't search. :rolleyes:

    It didn't work in this thread, what makes you think will work here?

    Personally, I agree with the mods.
     
  7. SpaceMagic thread starter macrumors 68000

    SpaceMagic

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Location:
    Cardiff, Wales
    #7
    I searched. Just look where the post is... this is exactly what i'm talking about. Thanks for just illustrating the power of the mods. Speak up against and then thats it... waste land.

    Another illustration of my point. People can talk about hot dogs, but not about ibooks.
     
  8. timmyb macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2005
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    #8
    Couldn't agree more with you SpaceMagic, I was gutted when I saw it had been locked. The fact that it got to 1100+ posts show how useful people found it. If you didn't like it, you didn't have to post on it.
     
  9. ham_man macrumors 68020

    ham_man

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    #9
    There is a diference between a conversation and a discussion. bousozoku was right to close the thread...
     
  10. applerocks macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    #10
    I am just a newbie and I would go to that thread a lot and look for information. There were posts speculating on when they would come out, possible options they'd have, etc. Even the second to last post notes how the last time there was a wait this long, a major design revision happened. That thread stopped me from creating new threads, partly because it was usually near the top. Many members joined just to post there. A lot of newbies.

    Although at times there were pointless posts, a lot of info is in there. I do think that it should be open, but that is what the Mod decided I guess.

    applerocks
     
  11. grapes911 Moderator emeritus

    grapes911

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2003
    Location:
    Citizens Bank Park
    #11
    People have been speculating for a long time. Almost none of that info has been reliable. Use the Buyer's Guide to find out about rumors and updates concerning the iBook.
     
  12. SpaceMagic thread starter macrumors 68000

    SpaceMagic

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Location:
    Cardiff, Wales
    #12
    I'd like to see the day when a discussion doesn't involve conversation.

    And, even if you are insinuating that conversation is worthless banter, then read the iBooks next tuesday thread and see that, as Applerocks says, there is useful information right up until the end.
     
  13. WinterMute Moderator emeritus

    WinterMute

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Location:
    London, England
    #13
    If you disagree with a Mods decision, PM the Mod and ask the question, if you don't like the reply, PM Arn, who owns the site.

    If Arn agrees with you he can instruct the Mods as to what course of action to take, if he agrees with the Mods, then the decision stands.

    It's been my experience as a member that Arn supports his Mods and the Mods do a fine job, (speaking as a member, not a Mod). As a Mod it's sometimes difficult to manage the large number of diverse threads that appear on these boards, and our decisions are not always popular ones.

    That said, I'd have closed the thread out at much the same point bousozoku did, had I seen where it was headed, it was starting to take a lot of time to moderate.
     
  14. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #14
    If your this upset over the thread being closed why not just open a new thread. :rolleyes: Don't cry over spilled milk just pour another glass. :cool:
     
  15. CanadaRAM macrumors G5

    CanadaRAM

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Location:
    On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
    #15
    The post you reference is in Community Discussion, which is (surprise) the correct forum for non-Mac-related conversation.
    The rules are different in Community,
     
  16. applerocks macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2005
    #16
    But the Buyer's Guide has said to wait for a very long time. All I was saying was we were finding out about potential events for where they may be announced, no matter how unreliable. Most people who posted there were curious since there are no rumors concerning iBooks. The last one was on 6/20 and that was a Page 2 rumor. Before that, the only main post with anything to do with iBooks in the title was the battery recall a month before. Not trying to start anything, but I do think the thread was useful for a handful (if not more) people.
     
  17. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #17
    Usually when a thread gets over 1000 posts the conversation gets out of hand, how many comments can one make about an iBook that have probably already been said.
     
  18. mac 2005 macrumors 6502a

    mac 2005

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #18
    Somewhat off-topic but related....

    With respect to contacting mods via PM, what is the best way to do so? Can you just select one at random or are mods assigned certain areas that are listed somewhere?
     
  19. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #19
    Find whatever one you see online and PM them, its that simple. :)
     
  20. Josh macrumors 68000

    Josh

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2004
    Location:
    State College, PA
    #20
    Conversation about iBooks, regardless of context of the conversation, is still about iBooks.

    And since iBooks = Macs, and discussion about iBooks therefore = discussion about Macs, the thread, regardless of how "conversationa," was still on topic and therefore within the rules).

    One person didn't see the use of a thread and closed it for their own judgement, which seemingly is not congruent with the thoughts of others.

    I run a forum myself, and understand sometimes threads need to be closed. But I would never close one just because I personally thought it was useless.

    Personally, I didn't care about that thread so I'm not worried about being closed. I just think the notion that "forums are not a place for conversation" is ridiculous. That's really the only point I'm debating.

    Conversation can be off-topic, or on-topic, but an expressive exchange of thoughts is conversation nonetheless.
     
  21. Applespider macrumors G4

    Applespider

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Location:
    looking through rose-tinted spectacles...
    #21
    I don't have the time to read through the iBook thread and judge on the discussion/conversation issue but there is a difference between them.

    A discussion involves several people all commenting on a topic. Some threads which start with conversations can degenerate into conversations where the majority of posts are between 2 individuals arguing over a single point which aren't particularly relevant to anyone else. These points should be taken to a private message/email arena since they're not contributing anything to the thread.

    There have been a few of these lately even on the Community where threads have become chatty comments between just 2 people.
     
  22. MacNut macrumors Core

    MacNut

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2002
    Location:
    CT
    #22
    If the conversation is on topic tho I don't see a problem with it. When threads are taken way off topic then it becomes an issue.
     
  23. mac 2005 macrumors 6502a

    mac 2005

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2005
    Location:
    Chicago
    #23
    Strikes me as a valid point. I'm not usually one for "splitting hairs," but I think that you've articulated a reasonable distinction.

    I do wonder, though: If a forum is "closed" and you revive the topic with another thread, is that OK under MR rules? Obviously, iBooks are going to be a topic of conversation/discussion as long as they're in the lineup -- so it seems reasonable that members might have comments, concerns, requests for help, etc.

    The fact that this particular post was past the 1,000 mark strikes me as -- Whoa! How much fortitude do you need as a reader -- let alone a mod who has other duties -- to plow through it for the nugget of information you want?
     
  24. eva01 macrumors 601

    eva01

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Location:
    Gah! Plymouth
    #24
    the absolute worst thing to do is bring something like this out to the public
     
  25. Don't panic macrumors 603

    Don't panic

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2004
    Location:
    having a drink at Milliways
    #25
    i quickly browsed through that ibook thread and though not particularly exciting to me, it didn't seem any worse than the majority of others thread, and more on topic then most, especially those of a certain lenght.
    maybe there was a particular stretch of posts that irked the mod, but I didn't see them.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page