pseudobrit is banned?

Discussion in 'Politics, Religion, Social Issues' started by IJ Reilly, Jun 7, 2005.

  1. IJ Reilly macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
  2. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #2
    oy ve! i guess it was the aclu thread.

    damn. i hope it's temporary.

    from another thread, i saw that ~Shard~ and Lacero were, as well, but i've no idea in which thread their trangressions took place.
     
  3. IJ Reilly thread starter macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #3
    You could look up their recent posts, just as I did with pseudo. All I came up with on him is the ACLU thread, in which it seemed several posters were misbehaving, but not outrageously, and nobody else was banned.

    Would the mods care to explain this situation?
     
  4. CanadaRAM macrumors G5

    CanadaRAM

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2004
    Location:
    On the Left Coast - Victoria BC Canada
    #5
    Lemme take a shot in the dark:

    The forum FAQs say that banning (other than outright spamming or trolling) is preceded by PM from the mods. If we assume that was the case, then the circumstances of that conversation would presumably have supported whatever action was taken. And I would not expect the mods to make public that private conversation, so...

    Banning happens, my experience thus far is that the mods are neither unreasonable or draconian.
     
  5. IJ Reilly thread starter macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #6
    We haven't had a banning in this forum since the rules were changed to prevent newbies from posting here (which was an open invitation to outside trolling and routinely abused). I can't recall the last time a regular was booted and most of those who were practically begged for it.

    I've supported the mods in their decisions most of the time, but on its face at least this seems to be an unusual action. So I'm asking.

    FWIW, Lacero is banned but ~Shard~ is not.
     
  6. WinterMute Moderator emeritus

    WinterMute

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Location:
    London, England
    #7
    It's often a cumulative effect, and whilst I'm not going to comment on an individual case, it's fair to say pseudobrit wasn't banned specifically for that thread alone.

    Regulars who get banned usually have history, but you won't get any details from the mods.

    I'm replying here specifically to IJ Reilly's query.

    Pseudobrit will be back soon enough.
     
  7. Abstract macrumors Penryn

    Abstract

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2002
    Location:
    Location Location Location
    #8
    So do you send a PM to the member first as a warning, and then ban him if he doesn't listen to that warning?

    No warning would be harsh.

    And I liked Lacero and Pseudobrit
     
  8. Diatribe macrumors 601

    Diatribe

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2004
    Location:
    Back in the motherland
    #9
    Why would Shard have been banned? :confused:
     
  9. edesignuk Moderator emeritus

    edesignuk

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2002
    Location:
    London, England
    #10
    As WinterMute said, reasons for bans or "time outs" are between the moderating team and those involved.

    No one is banned for no reason, or without warning. Those members that have been mentioned will be back.
     
  10. Zaid macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2003
    Location:
    London
    #11
    Maybe we should throw them a "Welcome Back" thread :) Sort of like when a mate comes of out jail :)
     
  11. Thomas Veil macrumors 68020

    Thomas Veil

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Location:
    Reality
    #12
    Should we give them $20 and a new suit?
     
  12. mactastic macrumors 68040

    mactastic

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2003
    Location:
    Colly-fornia
    #13
    Cantor: The Mods have spoken.

    Response: All hail the Mods.

    Cantor: Go in peace my children.
     
  13. zimv20 macrumors 601

    zimv20

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2002
    Location:
    toronto
    #14
    good to know, thanks.
     
  14. IJ Reilly thread starter macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #15
    Amen.

    The last time the mods called a "time out" on a poster, which was quite a while ago, some mention was made -- not necessarily of the specific cause or causes, but at least of the fact that the member would be allowed to come back after a prescribed period of time.

    I think that would be a good policy to continue, especially considering that this board is frequented by a relatively small number of regulars, so it is unnerving to see one slam-dunked for no apparent reason.

    BTW, as nearly as I can tell ~Shard~ was never banned. Somebody else said he was, but he wasn't when I checked.
     
  15. mac-er macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    #16
    I read that too fast, and I thought it said s*ut.

    LOL
     
  16. Mudbug Administrator emeritus

    Mudbug

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2002
    Location:
    North Central Colorado
    #17
    generally speaking long-time members will be given a "timeout" as opposed to a permanent ban. That is, unless the line has been crossed by a mile.

    We do discuss things before they happen with long-term folk. n00bs just get blasted ;)
     
  17. WinterMute Moderator emeritus

    WinterMute

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2003
    Location:
    London, England
    #18
    He may well have been for a day or two, we can ban a member for any length of time, but usually a day or so, a week or a permanent ban is instituted.

    As edesignuk said, no one get banned for no reason or without warning.

    [edit]

    Coo, a regular mod-fest going on in here.... Who else fancies a holiday from MR?? :D
     
  18. jelloshotsrule macrumors G3

    jelloshotsrule

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2002
    Location:
    serendipity
    #19
    i'm long overdue i'd say
     
  19. IJ Reilly thread starter macrumors P6

    IJ Reilly

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Location:
    Palookaville
    #20
    Just for the record, I didn't say it was for no reason, just no apparent reason. It's good to know that board veterans won't get their heads handed to them merely for having a bad day.

    I've scouted out some of the many Mactel threads that sprouted up this week, and some of them got pretty hot. Made the Politics boards seem downright calm by comparison. In one of the few I elected to participate in, I was sideswiped pretty good for making what I thought was an entirely noncontroversial observation. I'm sure this week presented quite a challenge to the moderators.

    So let me be clear: I think the mods do a really good job of keeping order in this inherently disorderly place. Sometimes the policies could be a bit clearer, is all.
     
  20. mischief macrumors 68030

    mischief

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2001
    Location:
    Santa Cruz Ca
    #21
    I'll second that last and add the following:

    If us veterans got our asses handed to us any time we took someone off at the shoulders I'd have dissappeared LONG ago. Granted, I've cooled off considerably in the last couple of years (I even reported myself the last time I just couldn't help myself).

    However, I think the Mods express some latitude for us old timers simply because such outbursts are rarely routine and are often used in a last resort when either another veteran is being verbally pummelled or when the Troll Bazooka has to come out of it's case.... :cool: ;) :D

    As in:

    " I really did try to reason with him but then he started picking on IJ's Momma... So I did a Sam Kinisson on him."
     
  21. QCassidy352 macrumors G3

    QCassidy352

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2003
    Location:
    Bay Area
    #22
    this just made me smile. :)

    By the way, when did mudbug become a "God"? Didn't he used to be an "editor" or something? I thought Arn was the only "God"... or what have I missed lately? :confused:
     
  22. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #23
    Wow, this is interesting, I have allways thought the Mods leaned to their politics, and biases........Im still wondering why iam carring this red dot around :confused: Im sure it was political or said something antiMac. :rolleyes:
     
  23. skunk macrumors G4

    skunk

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2002
    Location:
    Republic of Ukistan
    #24
    What red dot?
    :confused:
     
  24. Dont Hurt Me macrumors 603

    Dont Hurt Me

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2002
    Location:
    Yahooville S.C.
    #25
    You dont see my Red Dot? yours is Green so i guess you can go :D but i must stop? :cool:
     

Share This Page