QuarkXPress 7 Coming Soon?

Discussion in 'MacRumors News Discussion (archive)' started by MacRumors, May 12, 2006.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]

    According to Macworld.co.uk, Quark is gathering the press for an official launch event for QuarkXPress 7 at the Congress Centre in London on June 2. As the site notes, this is the strongest evidence yet that Quark is readying to ship version 7 of their over-due flagship desktop publishing application.

    Quark has seen greatly increased competitive pressure from Adobe's InDesign in recent years. A recent Macworld.co.uk poll shows that consumers are split in general between the competing platforms.
     
  2. macrumors 65816

    morespce54

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Location:
    Around the World
    #2
    It's darn about time !!! ;)
     
  3. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2002
    Location:
    CheeseLand
    #3
    The question is though...Will it have a universal binary?
     
  4. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #4
    Someone around here is attending that event after getting emails from Quark yesterday. Of course, the free food was the main attraction... but I expect some very interesting conversations to take place.


    Yes.
     
  5. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Location:
    Pasadena, Ca
    #5
    If you work in Pre-press this is not a welcomed thing.:(
     
  6. Editor emeritus

    longofest

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Location:
    Falls Church, VA
    #6
    QuarkXPress 7 is indeed UB. See their website. It is in beta now, but should ship as UB. If it doesn't actually ship as UB, then it will be an update soon afterwards (kind of like Digital Performer 5 by MOTU in the music realm).
     
  7. macrumors 6502a

    snkTab

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2004
    Location:
    Cincinnati, OH
    #7
    According to Macworld.co.uk, Quark gathing the press for an official launch event for QuarkXPress 7 is the strongest evidence yet that Quark is readying to ship version 7.

    Now that's a logical assumption.
     
  8. macrumors 6502a

    dizastor

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2001
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    #8
    Too bad it's too late...

    This sucker better really innovate to get anyone to consider it. All of the companies I've freelanced at over the last 2 years are either in the process of phasing out or already have phased out Quark completely.

    I dread having to open a file in Quark these days.

    Luckily my company recently purchased the wonderful Q2ID4 quark import plugin for InDesign. It works flawlessly 90% of the time.
     
  9. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2003
    Location:
    New York Citeeeeeeyyyy!
    #9
    Quark said since the beginning that version 7 would be UB. They already got burned out enough when they took too long to release an OS X version and lost a ton of market share to InDesign.
     
  10. Editor emeritus

    longofest

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Location:
    Falls Church, VA
    #10
    Hey, you never can tell with Quark... they like to keep pushing crap back and pulling "Next Tuesdays" on us
     
  11. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #11
    There are two things I want to know: how much is it (or our site license) going to cost? And when is v7.1 due out? ;)

    When 6.0 was released, there were useful discounts for the upgrade for about a month or so but anyone who uses Quark day-in, day-out knows that they don't have a great track record on x.0 releases.

    So... buy it straight away to save pennies but don't install it until the early adopters can show you their battle-scars.

    Oh, and by the way. Yeah, we know Quark suxxorz and InDesign roolz...
     
  12. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Location:
    Pasadena, Ca
    #12
    If you're talking about Indesign CS1 then maybe yeah, but 2.o PSHHHHH, Theyre both on the same level really.
     
  13. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2006
    Location:
    Quebec
    #13
    I just hope this new version won'T ba as buggy as 6.5...
     
  14. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #14
    Having used InDesign for a few freelance projects recently, I would respectfully disagree. InDesign offers a level of control over so many aspects of typography and layout that Quark 6 can only dream of dreaming of.

    However, Quark has some nice features that are not replicated in the current release of InDesign.


    My take:

    InDesign — creatively-inspiring but a bit cumbersome and palette-heavy.
    Quark — clunky but extremely fast in the hands of someone who knows what they're doing.
     
  15. Administrator

    Doctor Q

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Location:
    Kepler-452b
    #15
    That makes sense. One (inDesign) is relatively new (in the geologic sense), full of features but not refined over as much time. The other (QuarkXPress) is more of a legacy product, fine-tuned over the eons but more set in its ways.
     
  16. macrumors 68000

    FoxyKaye

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Location:
    San Francisco, Terre d'Ange, Bas Lag, Gallifrey
    #16
    Quark 6 really burned our magazine's production department, so much so everyone kept using 4.01 under Classic. I won't even mention Quark 5, which we thankfully avoided using.

    I wonder if 7 will ship with a letter of apology as well?

    I'd add to Dr. Q's assessment of Quark vs. InDesign by saying that when I first started using InDesign, it felt "cluttered."
     
  17. macrumors 6502

    lazyboy922

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2003
    Location:
    Las Vegas, NV
    #17
    Whoopty doo. This software is so late, I don't know if anyone would bother even using it. Most people have converted to indesign by now, unless they have been using Quark since the beginning. Indesign just goes so well with illustrator and photoshop, I think it would be silly to go back to Quark now. They really hurt themselves by taking so long to upgrade their software. It will be interesting to see how it pans out.
     
  18. Moderator emeritus

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2004
    #18
    That's the perception but not the reality. Most estimates still put Quark at around 60% market-share. There is also some distortion in these figures due to InDesign being bundled with the Creative Suite.

    The fat lady is still running through her scales...
     
  19. macrumors 6502a

    Starflyer

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2003
    #19
    Quark Is Dead.
     
  20. Editor emeritus

    longofest

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Location:
    Falls Church, VA
    #20
    If dead == still alive, then perhaps yes.
     
  21. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2003
    Location:
    atlanta
    #21
    i've used Quark on & off for years, but i've never LIKED the program. it's always seemed clunky, it's needlessly slow to get some things done and the quickkeys always seemed cryptic. maybe that was b/c i'm so used to adobe's quickkeys, but nonetheless it's still a little bassackwards.
     
  22. macrumors newbie

    Armaggideon

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2004
    Location:
    Shumen, Bulgaria
    #22
    I've gone through three beta releases of QXP 7 during the past few months and the third, which I'm using now is the best so far :) And yes, it is UB. I haven't had the chance to test it on an Intel Mac yet though.

    Version 7 is miles ahead of 6.5, it supports Unicode, Open Type and other handy improvements, too many to mention here. I really dread using 6.5 and below, since I work with plenty of languages and it's hell trying to cheat the bugger to display any different script acurately. Not to mention the rendering, which kind of reminds me of Windows:D Unfortunately, many client source files are Quark, so I have to play along.

    I throw party every time I get to work in InDesign. Sadly, some of the designers of the original files haven't bothered to upgrade their fifteen-year-old habits but such is life;)
     
  23. Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #23
    If Quark only made PhotoShop. I'll be buying Quark 7 purely out of spite against Adobe - this means I go back to my Quark roots again after switching to InDesign.
     
  24. macrumors regular

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2003
    Location:
    IL
    #24
    youre right! I hate Quark. We recently switched to InDesign and we are not looking back. Down with Quark!
     
  25. Guest

    iGary

    Joined:
    May 26, 2004
    Location:
    Randy's House
    #25
    I've never heard one pre-pree person bitch abotu Quark.....ever.

    I've heard plenty of bitching about InDesign.

    I think Blue's comments regarding the two suites is dead on.
     

Share This Page