Radioactive Material Found in Bagdad

Discussion in 'Wasteland' started by NavyIntel007, Apr 10, 2003.

  1. macrumors 65816

    NavyIntel007

    Joined:
    Nov 24, 2002
    Location:
    Tampa, FL
    #1
  2. Moderator emeritus

    Rower_CPU

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2001
    Location:
    San Diego, CA
    #2
    Sounds like an abandoned facility from failed previous attempts.

     
  3. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2002
    Location:
    Europe
    #3
    Re: Radioactive Material Found in Bagdad

    Nah I'll beat him to it! :p

    There is no evidence as yet that this was used for weapons. Did he have nukes in the past but got rid of them when told to? If so then maybe these are left over form then.
     
  4. macrumors 68000

    lmalave

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Location:
    Chinatown NYC
    #4
    Re: Radioactive Material Found in Bagdad

     
  5. macrumors 68000

    lmalave

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Location:
    Chinatown NYC
  6. macrumors 68000

    lmalave

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Location:
    Chinatown NYC
  7. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #7
    Re: Radioactive Material Found in Bagdad

    No, I won't flame you for the source.

    Instead, I'll point out that Iraq had a peaceful nuclear power programme and were aided in the 70's and 80's under the "atoms for peace" ideas in the UN. Their main help came from France, who also helped the Israelis with their nuclear weapons programme.
     
  8. Moderator emeritus

    Mr. Anderson

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2001
    Location:
    VA
    #8
    But on a more serious note...

    "It's amazing," Chief Warrant Officer Darrin Flick, the battalion's nuclear, biological and chemical warfare specialist told the newspaper. "I went to the off-site storage buildings, and the rad detector went off the charts. Then I opened the steel door, and there were all these drums, many, many drums, of highly radioactive material."

    Why didn't Blix find this?

    D
     
  9. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #9
    Maybe because we only gave him a few months?

    Nuclear material does not equal nuclear weapons.

    Highly radioactive material is almost never suitable for weapons use.
     
  10. macrumors 68000

    mcrain

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Location:
    Illinois
    #10
    Last time I checked, x-ray machines were radioactive.

    You can't assume that radioactive means bad. On the other hand, if there are barrels of weapons grade plutonium or enough stuff to make "dirty bombs," then you can start making those types of assumptions.
     
  11. macrumors 68020

    sparkleytone

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2001
    Location:
    Greensboro, NC
    #11
    last time i checked, iraq had 12 years to come clean. a few months indeed. funny how it took us 23 days or so. as far as imalave's little fox news crap goes, talk all the crap you want, but don't try to pin slavery on the republican party, which you seem to be oh so subtly suggesting.
     
  12. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #12
    Weapons grade plutonium is something Iraq cannot have unless it got it from outside, and that is highly unlikely. Also, you don't store plutonium in barrels; hell, you can't make enough of the stuff to fill barrels.

    The dirty bomb thing is different. Radiology machines have Cs-137, enough irridescent blue powder to contaminate a small town. Having barrels of Cs-137 in storage for radiological equipment does not mean you're going to use it for dirty bombs.

    As a matter of fact, it's impossible to prove that any nuclear material is intended for terrorist use. Radioactive chemicals have many more peaceful uses than they do military ones, and saying that since Iraq has nuclear material means they were planning a terrorist dirty bomb attack is BS.
     
  13. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #13
    No, I think he's probably blaming the South for that one. You gonna argue with that?

    "Took us 23 days?" for what? To find out that Iraq has no WMD? To find out that they posed no threat to ANYONE??
     
  14. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #14
    One more thing re: Fox "News"

    They and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs are the only ones printing this report.

    Remember when the Jerusalem Post's embedded reporter came up with that gem of a "100 acre chem factory" story that later turned out to be false? Remember the only national media organisation to pick up on that one? Yup. Fox "News."

    Fox jumps the gun again. Of course they never get egg on their face, because the "nothing found" stories aren't noticed nearly so much as the "SOMETHING FOUND" stories do.
     
  15. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #15
    Well, guess we should just stop looking.
    Pseudo you better at defending saddams regime than Bahgdad Bob was.


    I was just at the barber and foxnews was just frantically jumping on another story in which a platoon of marines had found a possible mobile bio weapons lab or launcher. Very early reports. Thats all I got due to the buzzing in my ear.
     
  16. macrumors 68000

    lmalave

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Location:
    Chinatown NYC
    #16
    No. Not blaming the South per se. Just conservatives in general - whatever party that might be at the time (Federalists, Whigs, Democrats, Republicans, whatever) on the major issues of the day.

    Face it, folks, liberals are usually vindicated by history. Let me ask you a question. Is society more liberal now than it was 100 years ago? 200 years ago? 500 years ago? 2000 years ago?

    Like Martin Luther King wrote from a Selma, Alabama jail cell:
    "The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice."

    Oh, and here's the most inflammatory picture I could find. Enjoy. ;) :p
     
  17. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #17
    I'm pretty sure the idea of "mobie weapons lab" was ruled out as being beyond the realm of practicality a few months back, except by the US administration, who ordered graphics drawn up of what a mobile lab "might" look like if we found such a thing.

    Then these pieces of fiction were displayed for the UN to look upon, and they did not heed the wise warnings of the government hack 3D artists...

    BTW, aren't "buzzing in my ear" and FOX NEWS synonymous? :D
     
  18. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #18
    I've been called a traitor and a Saddam lover more in the past month more times than I can count.

    It's a stupid, shallow tactic used by stupid, shallow people who can't argue facts and must resort to personal insults. ***** cowards and mental midgets.
     
  19. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #19
    Pseudo! resorting to personal insults like that is really a stupid and shallow tactic that makes you look not only stupid, but shallow.
     
  20. macrumors 68040

    pseudobrit

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2002
    Location:
    Jobs' Spare Liver Jar
    #20
    Did I aim it at anyone? Was it personal?

    (your comment on the other hand, was aimed at me personally. Gotcha.)
     
  21. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    #21
    Arn,

    You need to trash this thread in the Wasteland if you want to be fair.

    And you also need to stop censoring my posts. Be open and free. I have not insulted anyone personally.

    Stop censorship now.
     
  22. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2003
    Location:
    Chicagoland
    #22

    Yeah I thought you'd use that excuse. you're a genius.

    Your insult was aimed at many people that you didnt have the courage to name.

    My comment was clearly aimed at you personally. But jeez it was just a bahgdad bob joke.
     
  23. macrumors 68000

    lmalave

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2002
    Location:
    Chinatown NYC
    #23
    You gotta use smiley faces, dude. See, I posted inflammatory stuff, and even labeled it as such. But I always use my infosupersmiley. C'mon, dude, it's the year 2003. Shouldn't you have learned this back in 1996 at the very latest?
     
  24. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
  25. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2002
    #25
    Imalave, it's interesting that your last "controversial" Fox News image had a Strom Thurmond reference in it. And you also state Liberals are vindicated in history. Yeah. History will certainly vindicate Robert Byrd, liberal democrat AND EX KLAN MEMEBER. It's good to be in the KKK. Let history vindicate that one.

    So it seems that overgeneralizations and blind loyalty to the platform are penchants for left-leaners too? Why is it that everybody has this "I'm right, your wrong, shut-up" attitude. Why can't other people's opinions be accepted in spite of ones own?

    Don't forget LIBERAL sex witchhunts - can anybody say Bob Packwood? Both sides of the aisle suck.

    I'd also like to know just how everybody can be so darn certain that WMD will or will not be found? Whether it's Fox or CNN pumping your brains full, how in the hell can anybody say with total certainty that something will or will not happen on this matter? Gimme a break.
     

Share This Page