Review: Edwin the Duck Plays Music, Lights Up and Interacts With Kids for $100

Discussion in 'iOS Blog Discussion' started by MacRumors, Jan 8, 2016.

  1. MacRumors
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Edwin the Duck is an iPhone-connected rubber duckie that was first introduced to the world in 2014 via Kickstarter. The Kickstarter campaign failed to get enough interest and didn't reach its funding goal, but Edwin's creators, who had a vision of a better rubber duckie, didn't give up. Edwin was shown off at CES in January of 2015, made it into production, and began shipping later in 2015.

    Edwin caught a lucky break in December of 2015, winding up in the Apple Online Store, a sign of Apple's approval. Edwin is also now sold in other major retail locations, like Best Buy, where he's been getting some positive reviews from parents and kids alike.

    [​IMG]

    When we at MacRumors saw Edwin the Duck on Apple's site, we scoffed at the prospect of a $100 rubber duckie, which led to an invitation to try Edwin for ourselves to see whether or not it's worth shelling out $100 for an iPhone-connected duck.

    [​IMG]

    As something of a toy enthusiast, I gladly accepted the challenge. I'll say up front that I have no children to gauge a child's response to Edwin, but even as an adult, I was charmed by Edwin's design and impressed with his range of features. Edwin is cute, but he isn't perfect - there are some definite shortcomings, which I'll cover in my review.


    Click here to read more...

    Article Link: Review: Edwin the Duck Plays Music, Lights Up and Interacts With Kids for $100
     
  2. decimortis
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    decimortis

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2007
    Location:
    Toronto
    #2
    I stopped at the part where it suggested I hand my iOS device over to a 2-year-old playing in the bath.
     
  3. smizzle
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    smizzle

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2010
    Location:
    Pittsburgh, PA
    #3
    For a second I got excited to buy this for my daughter and then I saw the price tag. :(
     
  4. iOSFangirl6001
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    iOSFangirl6001

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    #4
    Same here... Guessing this is a ploy to force/trick people into replacing their iPhone or other Apple device either out of pocket or via phone insurance lol
     
  5. ArtOfWarfare
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    ArtOfWarfare

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    #5
    I don't have kids of my own, but I do have an 18 month old niece that I see every few weeks. Pretty sure the content would be plenty for her.

    I think you should play with a few more $100 toys for 2 year olds before you consider Edwin to be lacking in the content department - Edwin seems to have a lot more bang for your buck than most other toys aimed at 2 year olds.

    I definitely wouldn't give a 2 year old any iOS device while in a bath, but it seems like a fine idea to give them any of my old iOS devices (a 4S, a 3GS) that don't get touched anymore when they want to play with Edwin outside of the bath.
     
  6. jclo
    Expand Collapse
    Editor

    jclo

    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2012
    Location:
    California
    #6
    The iPhone doesn't need to go into the bathtub. The bath time song can be played while the iPhone is on the counter or something -- a child just wouldn't see the animations.
     
  7. Hastings101
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    Hastings101

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2010
    Location:
    K
    #7
    That was the most intricate review of a bath toy I have ever seen
     
  8. roland.g
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    roland.g

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2005
    Location:
    One mile up and soaring
    #8
    I can put music on for my kids and interact with them. And while I don't 'light up' I think I'll save my $100.
     
  9. Mactendo
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2012
    #9
    Oh, boy...
     
  10. IllmasterMath
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    Joined:
    May 16, 2012
  11. milo
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2003
    #11
    Gee, I can't imagine why.
     
  12. waloshin
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68030

    waloshin

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2008
  13. Dominicanyor
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    Dominicanyor

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2012
    Location:
    Florida
  14. iOSFangirl6001
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    iOSFangirl6001

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2015
    #14
    Thanks that makes more sense and seems far more practical. Definitely would want to keep an iOS device as far from water as possible ( at least till we actually get a waterproof/water resistant model )
     
  15. coolfactor
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2002
    Location:
    Vancouver, BC CANADA
    #15
    No kidding. How many phones are going to end up in the bath water when the parent isn't looking? :oops:
     
  16. NickD73
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors member

    NickD73

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2013
    Location:
    Arizona
    #16
    This is what happens when Johnny Ive AND Tim Cook put their heads together. Apple stock back to $130 next week.
     
  17. macduke
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 603

    macduke

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2007
    Location:
    Central U.S.
    #17
    As a fairly new parent with a toddler and another on the way, I can see why this failed on Kickstarter. It's not even completely about money—it just seems rather pointless. My mom loves wasting money and even she wouldn't buy this for her grandbaby.
     
  18. mikefla
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    #18
    For $100 yeah it better play with the kids!

    -Mike
     
  19. Pakaku
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    Pakaku

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    #19
    April 1st is still a few months away...

    No ****ing wonder this thing failed on kickstarter. Why did anyone think the world needed a "smart duck"? There needs to be a serious re-evaluation on what is worth considering "smartening" these days.
    --- Post Merged, Jan 8, 2016 ---
    I think we've figured out why the iPhone 7 will have no 3.5mm port: Because it makes the phone water-proof enough to be compatible with Edwin.
     
  20. japanime
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 65816

    japanime

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Location:
    Japan
    #20
    Despite all the hype, this $100 toy isn't all it's quacked up to be. :D
     
  21. myrtlebee
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68000

    myrtlebee

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    #21
    Somebody put way too much effort into this article.
     
  22. thefourthpope
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 6502a

    thefourthpope

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2007
    Location:
    DelMarVa
    #22
    Needs more likes
     
  23. keysofanxiety
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors 68040

    keysofanxiety

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2011
    #23
    Reading the phrase 'rubber duckie' multiple times in a serious review really made me smile. This was a very charming article.
     
  24. moxxham
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    moxxham

    Joined:
    Mar 8, 2015
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    #24
    Stay tuned for the waterproof iPhone 7 ;P
     
  25. applepuree
    Expand Collapse
    macrumors regular

    applepuree

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2014
    #25
    Another connected device i can live without!

    :quack:
     

Share This Page