Roku CEO Calls Apple TV a 'Money Loser', Says Product is 'Essentially' an Accessory for iPad

Discussion in 'MacRumors.com News Discussion' started by MacRumors, Mar 28, 2014.

  1. macrumors bot

    MacRumors

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2001
    #1
    [​IMG]


    Speaking at the inaugural Code/Media event held by technology website Re/code (via CNET), Roku CEO and founder Anthony Wood called the Apple TV "a money loser" for Apple, likening the product to an accessory for the iPad and questioning why Apple would want to sell more units of the device. Wood's remarks come as Apple is said to be preparing a new version of the Apple TV that will integrate with Comcast's network to enable a streaming TV service for users.
    [​IMG]
    Wood also commented on Amazon's upcoming set-top box debuting next month, as well as overall competition in the set-top media box market:
    The CEO also went on to tell the crowd that sales of the Roku doubled after Apple dropped the price of the Apple TV from $249 to $99 two years ago. Wood's comments are notable given that the Apple TV reportedly generated $1 billion last year, which was revealed by Apple CEO Tim Cook during the company's 2014 shareholder's meeting.

    Roku refreshed its set-top box line with three new models joining its flagship Roku 3 last September, and also introduced a $50 HDMI streaming-stick to compete directly with Google's Chromecast and the Apple TV. Despite the Apple TV's growing popularity, however, a report last August from Parks Associates indicated that the Roku has proven to be more popular than Apple's set top box, as 14% of U.S. broadband households were said to be using streaming media boxes.

    Apple is expected to launch a new Apple TV sometime in the near future, with some rumors pointed to a refined set-top box that may include gaming and cable box-like capabilities in addition to the aforementioned streaming TV integration.

    A report from The Information
    also added details to the forthcoming device, claiming that it will feature a dramatically overhauled interface, which will blend TV listings with apps and video from the web, with Apple asking iOS game developers to make their titles compatible with its new product so that users can play games on their TV using iOS devices as controllers.

    Article Link: Roku CEO Calls Apple TV a 'Money Loser', Says Product is 'Essentially' an Accessory for iPad
     
  2. macrumors 603

    Michaelgtrusa

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2008
    Location:
    Everywhere And Nowhere
    #2
    Not so fast mate.
     
  3. macrumors 601

    Icaras

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Location:
    California, United States
    #3
    It's Michael Dell all over again :rolleyes:
     
  4. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2004
    Location:
    UK
    #4
    An accessory for the iPad? About the only time I use the iPad ( or iPhone ) with the ATV, is when the remote goes missing....
     
  5. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2011
    Location:
    Livingston, Scotland
    #5
    I bought an Apple TV for my parents, and they love it. £99 for the device then £5.99 on Netflix a month for a good selection of TV programmes and movies is a pretty good deal to me. I have only ever used AirPlay once with my iPad.

    Remember how 64bit phones were a marketing gimmick...?
     
  6. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2011
    #6
    apple tv was there for years. i didn't even know roku existed. if it was so great, we should have heard about it, no?
     
  7. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Location:
    Beaumont, CA
    #7
    If their product truly is the best and most popular, why give free publicity to the competition?
     
  8. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2014
    #8
    Seeing as I've had my Apple TV (3) for about 2 years now and I've only ever connected it to my iPad for Spotify, I don't know how Roku base their arguments.

    Both are excellent platforms but clearly ATV complements an Apple eco-system if that's what you have so all this talk is pretty petite company spoke's person banter.
     
  9. macrumors 65816

    irnchriz

    Joined:
    May 2, 2005
    Location:
    Scotland
    #9
    I have 3 Apple TV's and 0 Roku boxes. I also have an ever growing library of TV shows and Movies in my iTunes. All that matched with Airplay from my MacBooks and iOS devices makes the Apple TV invaluable.

    Even looking rationally at the comment itself, "Apple TV is essentially an accessory for the iPad. They lose money, which is unusual for Apple,"

    A) I seriously doubt Apple lose any money on the Apple TV costs.
    B) An accessory for iPad? Works with iPhones too and aren't their like 500 million of them out there? along with tens of millions of iPads. Nice market to cater for.

    This all sounds like the final ramblings of a company about to go out of business when Amazon launch their set top box.
     
  10. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2013
    #10
    I'm going to make myself really unpopular here and say that if you're not using the apple tv for airplay then there are probably plenty of cheaper, more functional alternatives.

    (bear in mind in the UK they cost around $165, not $99, therefore the case is better for the apple tv in US)
     
  11. macrumors newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2014
    #11
    Roku is currently a better platform IMO, but their CEO is clearly anticipating ATV gaming, which will blow Roku out of the water.
     
  12. MonkeySee...., Mar 28, 2014
    Last edited: Mar 28, 2014

    macrumors 68040

    MonkeySee....

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #12
    Oh good! I enjoy it when someone comes out and criticizes a product when its not yet found its feet.

    I look forward to this guys opinion when the AppStore comes to AppleTV.
     
  13. macrumors 68000

    Parasprite

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    #13
    The word "Roku" is on the front page, and now we are comparing and talking about them when we weren't before.
     
  14. macrumors 65816

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    #14
    Apple TV was great when it had a harddrive to be honest. Now its just a media extender on steoroids .. my "tivo" (Or UK equivalent) can do what Apple TV does. It does Airplay (ok, my amp does), Netflix, all other channels relevant. But with my "tivo" I don't need another PC running iTunes with my library .. I "could" copy the stuff if needed or stream if required .. So for that sort of price (£99 here in the UK) you get other devices with a better value.
     
  15. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2012
    #15
    Insecure much?
    I have no idea about his product - I believe it's not available in my country.
    Yet I use my Apple TVs every single day, and purchase a bunch of content through them. That's why they make them, Roku CEO.

    Also I don't have an iPad. So not sure how his comment makes any sense.
     
  16. macrumors G3

    roadbloc

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2009
    Location:
    UK
    #16
    Accessory for an iPad? Maybe. I see it as more of an accessory for the iTunes Store.
     
  17. macrumors 65816

    Tankmaze

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    #17
    Any headlines that attack Apple only gain attention, but not credibility.
    This guy has no credibility at all. probably with this headline could help him sell 3 units of roku.
     
  18. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2009
    Location:
    Beaumont, CA
    #18

    I was asking why Roku chooses to name and disparage Apple TV if they believe that their products are the best. You don't hear Apple naming the Galaxy S4 or S5 in its ads.
     
  19. macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2010
    Location:
    Hawaii
    #19
    I've heard of these little roku devices. The mates over at slickdeals love these things when they can pick one up one for cheap

    I wish them the best of luck
     
  20. macrumors 603

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    #20
    He meant AirPlay video streaming / screen mirroring, as Apple doesn't offer other AirPlay receivers with HDMI output.

    Of course, what he stated is only half of the truth as the ATV can be used with iPhones / (newer) MB's too for streaming, not only iPads - and, of course, as a self-standing Internet video streamer too without any kind of local iDevices / MB's as a controller / video / mirrored screen source.

    ----------

    Depends on whether you've purchased stuff in the iTunes Store. If you have and don't want to store those movies locally, then, the ATV is decent. If you don't (and don't want to use AirPlay), then, there are indeed cheaper / better alternatives, particularly if you're a subscriber of other video streaming services.
     
  21. macrumors 65816

    Lone Deranger

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2006
    #21
    Roku who? :confused:

    Seriously... I've never heard of them.
     
  22. macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2012
    #22
    Pretty great on an iMac with mavericks in a dual screen setup too
     
  23. Guest

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2010
    #23
    He's just foreshadowing what is bound to happen.

    When Amazon and Apple release their new TVs this year, Roku is gonna hurt.
     
  24. macrumors member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2014
    #24
    One more interesting point from my angle.

    While the ATV may be an accessory for iOS devices, the CEO of Roku should note quite how many people have iOS devices.....millions.

    Plus have you tried to type a password on a Roku device?! What a PITFA!

    I do own a Roku device through a Now TV box from Sky. It costs just £10 and allows me to stream BBC iPlayer along with ITV, C4 and others in the UK.

    But, having said all that, I can do exactly the same with my iOS ATV set-up and type in searches much quicker.

    They have their pro's and con's but ultimately I think the ATV is a far more powerful product.
     
  25. macrumors 68000

    Parasprite

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    #25
    Straw ma...Mac vs P... eh I give up already.
     

Share This Page